Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,846 posts)
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 08:55 PM Feb 2013

Revenue must be part of any budget deal: Senator Reid

Source: Reuters

Revenue must be part of any budget deal: Senator Reid

WASHINGTON | Sun Feb 3, 2013 5:34pm EST

(Reuters) - The top Senate Democrat said on Sunday tax revenue must be part of any deal to replace looming automatic spending cuts, despite Republican warnings that they will not buckle over this issue after conceding on tax rises for the rich a month ago.

In separate remarks, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta also took aim at the $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts, known as the sequester, which bite on March 1 unless Congress takes action, and warned they would harm U.S. security.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the American people backed his party in the argument over tax increases and spending cuts, singling out tax breaks for oil companies and corporate jets as examples of loopholes he would close.

"The American people are on our side. The American people don't believe in these austere things. We believe that the rich should contribute," he told ABC News program "This Week With George Stephanopoulos."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/03/us-usa-fiscal-reid-idUSBRE9120CB20130203
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revenue must be part of any budget deal: Senator Reid (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2013 OP
I'm having a hard time taking him seriously at this point. amerikat Feb 2013 #1
Shit. We're doomed. Atman Feb 2013 #2
If Harry says it we can trust it. Autumn Feb 2013 #3
Harry? Harry? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2013 #4
Oh just shut up, Harry. Third Doctor Feb 2013 #5

amerikat

(4,909 posts)
1. I'm having a hard time taking him seriously at this point.
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 09:06 PM
Feb 2013

Don't think he will get any of what he wants after giving in on the filibuster.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
2. Shit. We're doomed.
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 09:07 PM
Feb 2013

Harry said it...so you can be sure he's already making deals to give up on any new revenues in exchange for more tax cuts for the rich.

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
5. Oh just shut up, Harry.
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 10:39 PM
Feb 2013

You lost your last bit of credibility a week ago and now you are posturing for the cameras again?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Revenue must be part of a...