HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Bishop (R-UT) amends Sand...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:45 PM

Bishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion

Source: Salt Lake Tribune

Bishop amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion

By Thomas Burr | The Salt Lake Tribune |
First Published 25 minutes ago • Updated 1 minute ago

Washington • Rep. Rob Bishop pushed through language in an emergency spending bill for Hurricane Sandy relief that precludes the government from buying any more property, a move environmentalists say could undermine access to national park sites.

Bishop’s amendment, which passed the House late Tuesday on a near party-line vote of 223-198, is aimed at ensuring the National Park Service doesn’t try to add land to its inventory instead of using funds to repair Sandy-damaged parks.

-snip-

Bishop said he understands that the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island and several other parks were hard hit by the storm last October but that the original bill was vague enough to allow the Interior Department to do more than repair storm-ravaged facilities.

Craig Obey, a senior vice president of the National Parks Conservation Association, says Bishop’s change in the legislation could hamper the government’s ability to add new trailheads or parking lots where previous access points were destroyed.

-snip-


Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55641556-78/access-add-bill-bishop.html.csp

6 replies, 970 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Bishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion (Original post)
Eugene Jan 2013 OP
davidpdx Jan 2013 #1
LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #2
davidpdx Jan 2013 #3
LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #4
politicat Jan 2013 #5
davidpdx Jan 2013 #6

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:19 AM

1. Shithead

It's too bad he comes from a state that likely won't ever need disaster relief. It would be nice to throw it back in his face later down the road.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:40 AM

2. Remove interstate access to the state?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 05:35 AM

3. The problem with that is there are 3 or 4 major interstate roads that run through the state

Including one that runs east to west. Instead let's just revoke all their federal funding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 09:18 AM

4. If we don't want to remove access to interstate roads for them

won't the federal funding do the same thing? They are unlikely or able to continue maintain those roads.

Most of any ideas we might have likely would have serious flaws anyhow and are just hopes that won't fly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 02:55 PM

5. Fires. Every summer, which endanger the neighbors (Colorado)

Let's just remember come summer, okay?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to politicat (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 03:44 AM

6. Ah, good point

Touche!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread