Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:21 PM
macwriter (27 posts)
Take Away Congress Pay and Perks If Debt Ceiling Isn't Raised
Default on Congress If They Default on the Rest of Us
http://www.lawyerpolitician.com/ceiling Now that the GOP has gone from promising total financial default by not raising the debt ceiling to “partial” default by picking and choosing what checks are written, they may have forgotten that the President’s Treasury Department gets to decide what bills get paid and which ones are put on ice. And since we are technically in default right now, there is not a moment to lose to suggest to the President and Secretary Geitner which bills we can start to ignore. Hint: Let’s begin with the more than $30,000,000 PER DAY it takes just to keep the doors of Capitol Hill open and in session. <snip> They go on to list 5 other ridiculous approprations that enrich no one else but Congress. They end with this advice: So Mr. President and Mr. Treasury Secretary, the ball is your court. As you continue to write checks to meet our obligations, make sure that our seniors and service members get their checks. Pay the people who trusted that we meet our financial obligations, but put Congress at the bottom of your list. If we’re going to default on anyone, default on them, because they certainly seem to be determined to default on the rest of us.
|
7 replies, 749 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| macwriter | Jan 2013 | OP | |
| msongs | Jan 2013 | #1 | |
| Kablooie | Jan 2013 | #2 | |
| bdublu | Jan 2013 | #3 | |
| Kablooie | Jan 2013 | #4 | |
| Arneoker | Jan 2013 | #5 | |
| ancianita | Jan 2013 | #6 | |
| Filibuster Harry | Jan 2013 | #7 |
Response to macwriter (Original post)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:12 AM
msongs (30,822 posts)
1. take back their recent raise AND cancel their medical/retirement nt
Response to macwriter (Original post)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:17 AM
Kablooie (8,942 posts)
2. And they should put on hold any money going to Republican House districts.
|
If a House member votes to stop payments, the first thing to cut should be any pork payments going to their districts.
Let their constituents learn what their representatives are doing to them. |
Response to Kablooie (Reply #2)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:36 AM
bdublu (6 posts)
3. cuz the left
|
Had NOTHING to do with the problems we're facing right now, right? Come out of the cave once in a while. BOTH sides are the problem.
|
Response to bdublu (Reply #3)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:51 AM
Kablooie (8,942 posts)
4. Uh oh. I must be trip, trap, tripping over your bridge.
Response to macwriter (Original post)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 05:35 AM
Arneoker (70 posts)
5. Take away their pay? You mean what to many of them is just an allowance?
|
Nahh! Put their private fortunes, and if possible, their future incomes, at stake!
|
Response to macwriter (Original post)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 07:38 AM
ancianita (1,053 posts)
6. Who actually prints the paychecks of all of Congress? Do you know?
|
And who could authorize those checks be stopped? Maybe it's the Office of Personnel Management, but I doubt the public knows who to even pressure to authorize a stopping of congress' paychecks.
|
Response to macwriter (Original post)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:43 AM
Filibuster Harry (583 posts)
7. Why would you continue to pay those members of congress who vote no on the debt ceiling?
|
I mean if they don't want the debt ceiling to increase to pay those debts that have already been racked up
then why should their pay continue?? Doesn't make sense to me. By the way can a spending cut discussion begin with cutting the "senate hair care revolving fund". They get enough perks. Take this away and demand that they work 5 days a week -- or maybe we should have part time congressmen. I am sure there are those unemployed who would love to work 2 days a week in congress -- i would. |

