HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Many Senate Democrats Rem...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 02:41 PM

Many Senate Democrats Remain Noncommittal On Hagel Nomination … For Now

Denying decorated war hero and foreign policy luminary Chuck Hagel the Pentagon’s top job will be a daunting task for his opponents.

But Republicans are spoiling for a fight against President Obama over the nomination of the former GOP senator for secretary of defense. If their early hostility matures into a broad party line, Hagel’s prospects for confirmation could hinge on the Democrats who have so far declined to endorse the heterodox Nebraskan for the key cabinet post.

It’s exceedingly rare for the Senate to reject a presidential nominee to a cabinet position. The last candidate that happened to was President George H.W. Bush’s 1989 nominee for the Pentagon, John Tower — although, a critical difference there was that the opposite party controlled the Senate. It’s somewhat less rare — though still uncommon — for a president to withdraw a cabinet nominee and is usually due to a scandal. The most recent two were Obama’s nominee for HHS secretary in 2009, Tom Daschle, and before that George W. Bush’s nominee for Department of Homeland Security, Bernard Kerik, in 2004.

No scandal is weighing down Hagel. The opposition to him arises from a mix of motivations: strong disagreement with his dissent against the prevailing D.C. consensus on how best to approach foreign policy toward Israel and Iran, lingering resentments from former GOP colleagues over his aloof independence, and a resistance to giving Obama full credit for nominating a Republican. There are also some muted Democratic misgivings about his anti-gay slur from 1998 about the ambassadorial nominee James Hormel, for which he recently apologized.

-snip-

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/many-democrats-noncommittal-on-hagel-for-secdef.php?ref=fpnewsfeed

6 replies, 683 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Many Senate Democrats Remain Noncommittal On Hagel Nomination … For Now (Original post)
DonViejo Jan 2013 OP
MADem Jan 2013 #1
Mass Jan 2013 #2
democrattotheend Jan 2013 #4
davidpdx Jan 2013 #6
zbdent Jan 2013 #3
bemildred Jan 2013 #5

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 02:47 PM

1. Barney Frank has forgiven him the "anti-gay" business from fourteen years ago.

Barney says if the GOP jerkwads are crying about him, he'll likely be a good candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 02:48 PM

2. Warren was non committal too.

Not negative, just reserving judgement.

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/01/elizabeth_warren_discusses_chu.html

In relation to President Barack Obama's contentious nomination of former U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Nebraska, to the secretary of defense position, the junior Bay State senator said she is reserving judgment until she can learn more in the Senate confirmation hearings.

"I'm looking forward to hearing more from Senator Hagel," Warren said. "That's what the Senate hearings will be about."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #2)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 03:51 PM

4. I do want to hear his explanation for the "Jewish lobby" comment

That comment bothered me a lot. It's not because I disagree with the substance of what he was saying about certain factions of the pro-Israel lobby being overly influential and not representative of all Jews or all supporters of Israel - I don't. But the term "Jewish lobby" really bothered me, because it is not only inaccurate but it perpetuates the worst stereotypes about Jews controlling the government that have been used to drum up resentment and support for persecution of Jews for centuries, and as a United States Senator he should know better.

I am inclined to support his nomination for other reasons but I would like to hear him explain what he meant and apologize for that comment, which was at best really insensitive and at worst indicates that he believes Jews (not the pro-Israel lobby) are too influential.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to democrattotheend (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 08:53 AM

6. I'm not trying to put words in Hagels mouth and I have no idea what his intent was

But I wonder if it was a slip of the tongue when he said that and he clearly meant Israeli lobby.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 03:11 PM

3. Vote "present"

and let the Repugs rip their own a new one, because he was nominated by Obama ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 08:31 AM

5. As long as you don't say anything, nobody can attack what you said.

In theory anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread