HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Progressive Tax Policies ...

Wed Jan 2, 2013, 10:01 PM

Progressive Tax Policies Needed!!

Quoting J.J. Goldberg at forward.com:  
  
Eisenhower inherited a top marginal income tax rate of 92% from his predecessor Harry Truman when he entered the White House in 1953. He quickly lowered it to 91%, where it stayed until Lyndon Johnson lowered it again to 77% in 1964 and then 70% in 1965.  
  
During his eight years in the White House, Eisenhower managed to reduce the federal deficit by 75% — down to a quarter of the size he inherited — while building the Interstate Highway System and launching America’s space program. GDP growth averaged 3% per year. Unemployment averaged just under 5.5%.  
  
Reagan, entering office in 1981, inherited Johnson’s 70% top marginal income tax rate and immediately lowered it to 50%, then to 38.5% and finally to 28%. His theory was that high taxes stifle economic growth, while lowering taxes unleashes growth and creates jobs. It was a great national experiment, and the result was conclusive: It didn’t work. Growth averaged 3.4% per year during Reagan’s presidency, hardly better than Eisenhower’s, while unemployment averaged a shocking 7.43%, far worse than Eisenhower’s and hardly better than the much-maligned Obama record.   
  
So the next time you listen to a presidential debate, remember that nobody up there is taking the Democratic side. The debate we’re having today is between a robust Reaganism and a faint, timid echo of Eisenhower Republicanism. In fact, when you get down to it, the Democrats can’t even bring themselves to take Eisenhower’s side with any conviction. We’re all touting variations on a flimflam theory that’s been tried and proven a colossal failure.

--------

How To Cut Spending: End Corporate Welfare!!!     
    
As Rex Nutting of Marketwatch noted in his 12/18/2012 article "Why isn’t Obama demanding corporate welfare cuts?", "$2.6 trillion could be saved It’s possible to achieve all the budget savings we need for the next 10 years simply by cutting the fat out of discretionary spending programs and tax expenditures without raising tax rates on the wealthy or cutting the safety net at all."     
     
Oil and gas companies, which are raking in record profits, certainly don't need $4 billion a year in subsidies, and even the oil company CEOs admit they don't need it!     
     
Why are cuts to Social Security and Medicare even being discussed while literally billions in corporate welfare are constantly spilling out of the Treasury? 
    
White House petition to End Corporate Welfare: http://wh.gov/Qa6f
~

1 replies, 443 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Progressive Tax Policies Needed!! (Original post)
commenter8 Jan 2013 OP
reteachinwi Jan 2013 #1

Response to commenter8 (Original post)

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 12:05 AM

1. The recently passed deal does the opposite of your suggestion.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread