HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Weakened Filibuster Refor...

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:13 AM

Weakened Filibuster Reform Plan Unveiled In Congress By John McCain, Carl Levin

The proposal by Levin and Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), doesn't propose a new rule requiring a talking filibuster, but a document they distributed explaining their proposal said the leaders of the two parties would require it.

"If a senator wants to block legislation, he or she should go to the floor of the Senate, and be there for that objection," said McCain.

"You must talk," said Levin, adding that no new rule is needed because the talking requirement has never actually been dropped. It's only been waived by senators as a courtesy, McCain and Levin said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/weakened-filibuster-reform-mccain_n_2377516.html


This plan will not fix anything.

18 replies, 1632 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 18 replies Author Time Post
Reply Weakened Filibuster Reform Plan Unveiled In Congress By John McCain, Carl Levin (Original post)
UCmeNdc Dec 2012 OP
newfie11 Dec 2012 #1
Cosmocat Dec 2012 #2
newfie11 Dec 2012 #3
sabbat hunter Dec 2012 #4
LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #9
catbyte Dec 2012 #5
Champion Jack Dec 2012 #6
budkin Dec 2012 #7
xxxsdesdexxx Dec 2012 #8
LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #10
cyberswede Dec 2012 #17
Teamster Jeff Dec 2012 #11
markpkessinger Dec 2012 #12
davidpdx Dec 2012 #13
davidpdx Dec 2012 #14
lunatica Dec 2012 #18
Revolutionary Girl Dec 2012 #15
SouthernDonkey Dec 2012 #16

Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:22 AM

1. This is bull shit

As usual

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to newfie11 (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:25 AM

2. A small apetizer for the big fiscal cliff compromise

that Reid/McConnell will cook up.

The only saving grace might be the insane clown posse in the House.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmocat (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:31 AM

3. I'm not holding my breath nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to newfie11 (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:33 AM

4. an actual talking filibuster

may actually help reduce the amount of filibusters. It will be hard to find someone who wants to stand on the floor of the senate and talk for 24 hours or more to do a filibuster.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabbat hunter (Reply #4)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:24 PM

9. Would be fine if they enforce it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 08:11 AM

5. Come on, Carl. Please don't do this!

He will hear from me in several different mediums.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 08:42 AM

6. What a surprise....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 05:17 PM

7. You know the Dems have the upper hand when they give everything away

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:19 PM

8. We need the Udall/Merkely "Talking Filibuster" not the McCain/Levin nonsense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xxxsdesdexxx (Reply #8)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:24 PM

10. I agree.

It has time limits for each step.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xxxsdesdexxx (Reply #8)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 08:18 AM

17. Yes - and there's a petition supported by the sponsoring senators

...including senator-elect Elizabeth Warren.

http://www.reformthefilibuster.com/

Here's a summary of the proposal:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/Rules%20Reform%20One-Pager.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:28 PM

11. Rightwingers and Centrists (Rightwingers) don't solve problems

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Dec 29, 2012, 11:09 PM

12. A letter (e-mail) I just sent to Senator Schumer

Last edited Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:46 PM - Edit history (1)

December 29, 2012



Senator Charles E. Schumer
322 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Schumer:

Having just read the details of the proposed filibuster "reform" bill> introduced by you and Senator McCain (and some others), as a New Yorker and as a Democrat, I am absolutely outraged to see ANY Democrat's name (let alone my own Senator's) on such a watered-down, meaningless bill.

For the past four years, despite Democrats having won the White House and having retained a majority in the Senate, a minority party has been able to block bill after bill and nominee after nominee. Democracy has been turned on its ear as the will of the people, as expressed by the majority of their votes, has been subjugated to and overturned by a radical, extreme political party, merely by means of invoking a badly administered parliamentary maneuver. This is not what the nation's founders envisioned, nor is it what virtually every American has learned since he or she was a child about the way a representative democracy is supposed to work. This thwarting of democratic will is the primary problem that needs to be addressed at this juncture.

The bill you have proposed merely adds a few additional burdens to those wishing to filibuster legislation or executive and judicial branch nominees. But the actual ability to filibuster is the thing that needs to be seriously curtailed in the interest of enabling the electorate to express its will while at the same time having a reasonable expectation that such electoral will would be honored.

Any meaningful filibuster reform MUST include ALL of the following if it is to be considered to be at all serious:

(1) Eliminate the ability to filibuster the motion to proceed;

(2) Require that those wishing to block legislation or nominations take the floor and actually filibuster—i.e., mandating “talking filibusters”;

(3) Assert that 41 Senators must affirmatively vote to continue debate rather than forcing 60 Senators to vote to end debate; and,

(4) Streamline the confirmation process for all nominees by eliminating the currently required 30 hours of post cloture debate on a nominee to zero or at a minimum no more than 2 hours.

In short, Senator Schumer, if you want my continued support at the ballot box, and if the party as a whole expects me to remain a loyal Democrat, then you should withdraw this ill-considered, meaningless bill post haste, and get to work on a REAL filibuster reform bill that will actually address the problems with the filibuster as it currently stands, rather than merely trying to paper over certain parts of it and enabling senators to claim to their constituents that they actually _did_ something about filibuster reform. Neither you nor any other Democrat was elected to create legislation in response to a real problem that amounts to nothing more than some cosmetic changes intended to create the impression among voters that something meaningful was done.

Senator Schumer, I respectfully urge you to ditch this legislation and to promptly get back to doing what you were elected to do: that is, to come up with REAL solutions to the real problems we face. What NO voter in this country wants from its elected senators is a senator that signs onto half-measures that do nothing but provide senators with political cover while failing to address the root of the problem.

Sincerely,
Mark P. Kessinger
New York, New York



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to markpkessinger (Reply #12)

Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:14 PM

13. Please let us know if you get a reply

Hopefully it's not one of those damn form letters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:15 PM

14. Feinstein has pretty much signed on

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #14)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:49 AM

18. Yeah. She loves to 'look' like she's doing something

I despise her. She has the same luck John McCain has of looking good no matter how fucking low she goes. It's because her career really took off when Mayor George Moscone was murdered. She succeeded him without the benefit of being elected. And she keeps getting re-elected because no one ever challenges her from the Democratic Party.

I really do despise her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 02:09 AM

15. I don't trust anything that has McCain's stamp of approval.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Revolutionary Girl (Reply #15)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 04:19 AM

16. +1 And welcome to DU!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread