Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:31 PM Dec 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (busterbrown) on Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:10 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) busterbrown Dec 2012 OP
No I don't believe we should ALL support her but ebbie15644 Dec 2012 #1
Moot Point Isn't It? Indykatie Dec 2012 #2
I'm proud of the fact that as a member of the Democratic party, no one politicaljunkie41910 Dec 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author busterbrown Dec 2012 #4
Er. He never nominated her so... Maximumnegro Dec 2012 #5
Yes, that's exactly what we're supposed to do because demwing Dec 2012 #6

ebbie15644

(1,214 posts)
1. No I don't believe we should ALL support her but
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:36 PM
Dec 2012

she deserved a fair hearing and not made up attack by the Republicans. We are not upset that people might disagree with this choice but by the lies that were told for purely political reasons and not on her qualifications or lack of them.

Indykatie

(3,695 posts)
2. Moot Point Isn't It?
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:49 PM
Dec 2012

I trust PBO to make sound appointments so I would support her if her nomination had moved forward. Secretary Clinton spoke highly of her as a potential nominee also so I had no problems with her. My problem is with her being forced out by republicans who obviously have a preference to see Kerry in the role either because they genuinely support him or because they see the potential to win the MA seat if he gets the SoS position.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
3. I'm proud of the fact that as a member of the Democratic party, no one
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 08:54 PM
Dec 2012

dictates what I can and cannot think.

I have read here, this evening statements from people who have said that they wouldn't vote for because of the stock she owns. The only reason that people know what stock she owns is because of her the information that she disclosed on her federal disclosure forms which she as a member of the Executive Branch is required to disclose. She also happens to be married to a Canadian. The stock in question could belong to her husband for all they know, but since on this particular disclosure form you have to provide data that you and your spouse own.

And what if it is her own. As a Black woman, she isn't supposed to own anything? I think the reason the information was leaked was to do just what it did; raise the envy of green eye'd snakes.

Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #3)

Maximumnegro

(1,134 posts)
5. Er. He never nominated her so...
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 09:03 PM
Dec 2012

Dems need to quit worrying. Does anyone really think Obama did not consider Rice a longshot? Repubs have been playing this game for years. I don't believe for a second that Rice was expected to make it. Does anyone not know this president yet after all this time? Come on.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
6. Yes, that's exactly what we're supposed to do because
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 09:08 PM
Dec 2012

Dems always support candidates for superficial reasons.

No wait, I'm talking about Republicans. My bad.

What were you talking about?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...