Sat Dec 1, 2012, 12:46 PM
DonViejo (6,037 posts)
Pelosi Threatens To Force A Vote On Bush Tax Cuts For Middle Class
Last edited Sat Dec 1, 2012, 12:48 PM - Edit history (1)
By Aviva Shen posted from ThinkProgress Economy on Dec 1, 2012 at 8:30 am
With Republicans balking at the prospect of allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for the top 2 percent of Americans, Democrats are losing patience. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) said Friday that the House GOP will not hold a vote on a middle-class tax bill that excludes the top income brackets, even though the Senate has already approved one. In response, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced Friday that Democrats plan to bring the legislation to a floor vote next week no matter what. The Democrats plan to use a discharge petition, which can force a bill to the floor if it has been stuck in committee for 30 legislative days. In a new statement, Pelosi dared her Republican colleagues to reject the plan to extend tax cuts for 98 percent of the country:
The clock is ticking, the year is ending, it’s really important, with tax legislation, for it to happen now. We’re calling upon the Republican leadership in the House to bring this legislation to the floor next week. We believe that not doing that would be holding middle-income tax cuts hostage to tax cuts for the rich. Tax cuts for the rich which do not create jobs, just increase the deficit, heaping mountains of debt onto future generations.
In order to make a discharge petition work, Pelosi needs 20 Republicans to sign on to the measure. Several Republican legislators, notably Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK), have called for Republicans to accept President Obama’s deal on middle-class tax cuts.
We must learn to live together as brothers (and sisters) or perish together as fools.-- Dr Martin Luther King
6 replies, 699 views
Pelosi Threatens To Force A Vote On Bush Tax Cuts For Middle Class (Original post)
|Walk away||Dec 2012||#3|
|Pab Sungenis||Dec 2012||#4|
Response to krawhitham (Reply #1)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 12:54 PM
Walk away (5,081 posts)
3. If she can't but everyone who won't sign will be GUILTY of taking that extra money....
...out of our paychecks starting the first of the year. Let there be no mistake who cares about the middle class. Democrats can use that naughty list for years past this Christmas.
<a href=".html" target="_blank"><img src="" border="0" alt=" photo snow4_zps0a55aa63.jpg"/></a>
Response to krawhitham (Reply #1)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 12:58 PM
Andy823 (5,286 posts)
5. I don't know
However she can force all the republicans to go on record with their vote, and if the vote against it, then they will have to face the people back home when they take off for Christmas break. It won't go over very well for those republicans that will be returning next year if they vote against helping 98% of the people in this country simply because the "richest" people in the the country won't get a tax break, something they don't really need in the first place, and something that has been hurting the deficit since Bush gave them the two tax breaks.
The old BS about the "job creators" is not going to work since we went through the worst recession in history while the 2% got those huge tax breaks, and we still haven't seen all those "jobs" they were supposed to be creating!
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 12:53 PM
Lionessa (3,894 posts)
2. Good on Nancy, however, at this point
I really don't understand all this rangling. Just do nothing. Let them all expire, then in January do a middle class tax cut and dare repubs to vote against it. This is just a waste of energy doing it this way.
We can't be the champions of the poor and meek if we alert or harrass regarding that which might be associated with the poor and meek in this country, like spellos or typos or gammaros or foul language.