Fri Nov 23, 2012, 06:56 PM
DonViejo (6,085 posts)
The GOP’s Conspicuous Silence About Entitlement Cuts
BRIAN BEUTLER NOVEMBER 23, 2012, 3:33 PM 3913
Republicans are coming to terms with the fact that they will have to cede real, higher tax revenues to President Obama if they want to avoid the full expiration of the Bush tax cuts.
But while Democrats have been explicit about what they want from the GOP — a higher top income tax rate on high earners — Republicans have been vague about what they want in return.
When asked, Republicans insist that Democrats will have to accept “structural reforms” to support programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security if Republicans are to relent on taxes. But neither Democratic nor Republican aides can publicly say what would pass the GOP’s “structural reform” test.
“What do you think they mean by structural changes?” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi asked rhetorically at a Capitol press conference last week. “Do they mean reducing benefits to our — to America’s great middle class? What do we mean? I mean, let’s define our terms. What do they mean by structural changes? … Is that a euphemism for I am going to cut your benefit if you are a middle‑aged senior? Is that what structural change means? No, I don’t support that.”
We must learn to live together as brothers (and sisters) or perish together as fools.-- Dr Martin Luther King
4 replies, 1026 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
The GOP’s Conspicuous Silence About Entitlement Cuts (Original post)
Response to msongs (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 23, 2012, 07:34 PM
ProudProgressiveNow (3,258 posts)
4. +1000 nt
In order for this struggle to have meaning, the oppressed must not, in seeking to regain their humanity, become in turn oppressors of the oppressors, but rather restorers of the humanity of both.