HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Lindsey Graham Is Dangero...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 06:34 PM

 

Lindsey Graham Is Dangerous

I've been watching this right wing lunatic on the sunday talk shows for years and have known that this guy is a dangerous person to be allowed to even open his mouth when it comes to international affairs, he's one of those real tough guys when he's sitting behind a microphone but as the President proved earlier this week, he isn't scared of this asshat, his lies, or his nasty, despicable rhetoric.

What did Lindsey have to say when Booosh ignored the warnings about Bin Laden attacking Americans on our own soil, which eventually led to the 9/11 attacks on the WTC???? And when Booosh started a 7 year war with a country that had very little, if nothing, to do with the 9/11 attacks based on incorrect/false intelligence relating to Iraq's possession of WMD's?????

The hypocrisy and blatant racism of the Republican party is exactly why they lost the Presidency and could only keep the House by gerrymandering the voting districts. But instead of learning the obvious lessons of this election they are actually doubling down and Lindsey Graham is the face of the ignorant far right fools in America and he's the typical hypocrite the baggers love soooo much. They are obviously VERY desperate to go after President Obama and attempting to create a phony scandal out of a tragedy is all he's got. He like much of the rest of the GOP only look more insane each and every day. It's obvious the election has driven all of them off the deep end.

7 replies, 1387 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Lindsey Graham Is Dangerous (Original post)
johnlennon_shallrise Nov 2012 OP
Zorro Nov 2012 #1
Tutonic Nov 2012 #2
David__77 Nov 2012 #4
The Wizard Nov 2012 #5
Carolina Nov 2012 #6
David__77 Nov 2012 #7
EmeraldCityGrl Nov 2012 #3

Response to johnlennon_shallrise (Original post)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:48 PM

1. Larry Flynt needs to invest some money to publicly out this douchebag

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:56 PM

2. how would that address the fact that he is a dangerous man politically?

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tutonic (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:14 PM

4. Because it would neutralize him politically, that's why.

And it's perfectly valid to do so. It's funny, because he is quite obviously a homosexual, and I say that as a gay man. There is no doubt about it. I have no idea whether he is sexually active. Either way, it would be relatively simple to get the people of South Carolina (enough of them) to get sufficiently creeped out about him such that his political goose would be cooked. It's not even that he is homosexual, but that he is ashamed of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David__77 (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:39 PM

5. His constituents

for the most part know his sexual proclivities and only vote for him because he doesn't like the coloreds either. In South Carolina you can get elected just for having an R after your name, even if your name is Goering or Stalin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David__77 (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 10:00 PM

6. we know

In fact, one of his opponents once called him "light in the loafers" Lindsey.

Somehow, those who vote for him don't care despite their vociferous homophobia otherwise. Neutralization ain't happening any time soon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carolina (Reply #6)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 10:05 PM

7. I'm sure it can be managed.

The problem with the Democrats is that they don't know how to politically annihilate their opponents. I believe that most of the right-wingers in South Carolina think he is a "bachelor" that may have been confused at some point. But what if Graham was really predatory with his male staff members like Tom Foley? What then? I think they would quickly drop him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorro (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:57 PM

3. I'm sorry to say I have reached the point I agree with you.

Fight fire with fire. He's a hypocrite and a coward for not having the courage as a public servant
to be an example. Something only someone in public service has the unique ability to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread