HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Obama pollster: Gallup, p...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sat Nov 17, 2012, 09:13 AM

Obama pollster: Gallup, public polling needs a retooling

President Obama’s lead pollster, Joel Benenson, took issue with the wild variations in the Gallup polling data – and the various public surveys that were widely off the mark – in a post-election interview with POLITICO.

Benenson, whose forecasting model was critical to the campaign, went through the major issues with the public polls that showed wild variations throughout the final weeks of a remarkably stable race.



http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/11/obama-pollster-gallup-public-polling-needs-a-retooling-149807.html

2 replies, 631 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Obama pollster: Gallup, public polling needs a retooling (Original post)
UCmeNdc Nov 2012 OP
frazzled Nov 2012 #1
Midwestern Democrat Nov 2012 #2

Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:05 AM

1. I don't think Gallup's polling lapses were entirely the function of error

I think some of these outfits intentionally skew their "likely voter" models to create the impression that a candidate is doing better than he really is, in order to create enthusiasm and momentum and inevitability and all that stuff (and then in the last few days, try to bring it more in line with realities, to save their reputations). I think it was done on a ridiculous scale this season.

I also think they are of the mind these days that it no longer matters how they get ranked for accuracy after all is said and done. (Just as the Romney campaign overtly stated they didn't care about the fact checkers). Their purpose is now to create an impression, not to accurately reflect the facts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:24 AM

2. Well, Gallup certainly has a lot of explaining to do. How could they seriously project that whites

would make up a larger percentage of the electorate in 2012 than in 2004 (78% vs 77% - the actual 2012 share was 72%)? Personally, I don't think I'll ever take a Gallup poll seriously again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread