Sun Nov 11, 2012, 02:06 AM
Justice (4,607 posts)
Why are republican donors so surprised that Romney didn't tell them the truth?
After all, they knew Romney was a "good" liar - he about Obama's positions and statements. The donors must have thought hey, if Romney can lie about Obama, what makes me think he is telling me the truth about anything?
3 replies, 896 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Why are republican donors so surprised that Romney didn't tell them the truth? (Original post)
Response to Downwinder (Reply #1)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 02:49 AM
shanen (235 posts)
2. Also the other way around
Romney says whatever he thinks the other side wants to hear. Truth and lies have no meaning in Romney's universe. His only concern is whether his utterances will get him the results he prefers. If he could only fake sincerity as well as Reagan, then he might have amounted to something in the real world (where there are entities besides money and objectives besides getting more money).
Let me clarify that I think Reagan was only sincere as a method actor. If Reagan had been a first rate actor, then he would actually have been less plausible in his role as president. As a simpleminded but competent enough method actor, I think Reagan was quite sincere in believing whatever he saw on his teleprompter.
Romney is much more in Nixon's mold. He is smart enough to know the truth. He just doesn't care. (To be contrasted with Dubya, who never knew and never cared.)
Response to Justice (Original post)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 08:29 AM
Squinch (9,549 posts)
3. Seriously, how did these guys get to be "titans of industry?" They're too dumb to look at numbers
and they get their information from Fox News and Karl Rove?
At no point, ever, was the electoral vote for this election close. It just wasn't.
The only way a thinking person could think Romney was going to win was if they knew about a fix.