I wonder

I wonder how long its going to take the Republicans to realize that in 2016 that the Democratic Candidate

will not have a father that is born in Africa and who was Muslim

middle name won't be Hussein

When they go back and re look at the demographics and factor that in, plus while we are likely to have another great African American candidate soon, its pretty certain that, unfortunately IMO, we won't have any running in 2016.

Now Gentleidiots of the Republican Party,

If your demographics are not good in 2012

and they are going in the wrong direction in 2016

and that this President running with this particular red meat flags will not be in force and the economy will continue to recover

Just how much worse did your demographic projections work

and

just exactly what the hell are you going to run on besides abortion?

8 replies, 524 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
I wonder (Original post)	grantcart	Nov 2012	OP
We should start a rumor	Filibuster Harry	Nov 2012	#1
Aw, that's just mean	thecrow	Nov 2012	#2
You can bet though...	PoliticalBiker	Nov 2012	#3
lol well I don't know. I am kind known as a timid fellow around these parts.	grantcart	Nov 2012	#4
Interesting thought. From 1993-2001 the Republicans fixated on the Democratic President's genitalia	madinmaryland	Nov 2012	#5
Hopefully her Mammary glands !!!	grantcart	Nov 2012	#6
Martin O'Malley speaks spanish?	madinmaryland	Nov 2012	#7
LOL.....Kick and rec!!	cliffordu	Nov 2012	#8

Response to grantcart (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:08 PM

Filibuster Harry (583 posts)

1. We should start a rumor

Last edited Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:09 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

that the president will change the rules in order to run for a third term just like Bloomberg.

How do you think they will respond to that?

Reply to this post

Response to Filibuster Harry (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:20 PM

thecrow (4,383 posts)

2. Aw, that's just mean

like flying model airplanes painted blue, with the U.N. logos painted on the tail around a teabagger's house.

Reply to this post

Response to grantcart (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:26 PM

PoliticalBiker (328 posts)

3. You can bet though...

Abortion will come up.
And so will LGBT issues.
And so will religious issues
And so will race.

Not that ANY of them will have anything to do with how the country is run. The republicrats have nothing to talk positive about so the same old wedge issues will arise. They always do... every election cycle. It is up to US to squash their arguments before they get started.

Are you up for it?

Reply to this post

Response to PoliticalBiker (Reply #3)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:03 PM

grantcart (38,759 posts)

4. lol well I don't know. I am kind known as a timid fellow around these parts.

I'll try and screw up my gumption dagnabit.

Reply to this post

Response to grantcart (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:25 PM

madinmaryland (52,948 posts)

5. Interesting thought. From 1993-2001 the Republicans fixated on the Democratic President's genitalia

and from 2009-2017, the Republicans fixated over the color of the Democratic President's skin (I was going to say genitalia).

What will be the Republicans be fixating over the Democratic President's ???? from 2017-2025???