Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,758 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:01 PM May 2016

Sanders campaign declines KY recount so taxpayers can foot bill for recanvass.

What's the difference?

As NPR's Asma Khalid noted on air — a recanvass will "entail checking all of the voting machines and absentee ballots in all each of the state's counties to verify the accuracy of the vote totals."

In other words, individual ballots will not be checked. A recount would have re-checked how people voted on actual ballots.


Hillary Clinton leads Sanders by less than 2,000 votes following the May 17 primary.

You mean they won't check actual ballots?

Nope.

Why would Sanders not request a recount then?

Because his campaign would have to pay for it. The state pays for the recanvass.

Politically, it gives Sanders the opportunity to continue to call into question the results; allow some of his supporters to continue to allege that Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, who is close to the Clintons, put her finger on the scale; raise money — and do all of it at no cost.

Not to mention — all of this is over probably one delegate. The AP allocated 27 pledged delegates apiece for Clinton and Sanders with one outstanding. Clinton currently leads by 271 pledged delegates and 766 overall.



http://www.npr.org/2016/05/24/479346781/why-sanders-requested-a-recanvass-and-not-a-recount-in-kentucky

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders campaign declines KY recount so taxpayers can foot bill for recanvass. (Original Post) RandySF May 2016 OP
Why would Sanders not request a recount then? DJ13 May 2016 #1
I think it is because he is virtually broke WhiteTara May 2016 #3
SWING AND A MISS nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #5
How do you count black box voting? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #2
Theres nothing wrong with black box voting machines DJ13 May 2016 #4
Hillary does best where voting machines flunk hacking tests. AtomicKitten May 2016 #7
I'd be interested in cross checking this article against BS campaign fundraising msanthrope May 2016 #6

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
1. Why would Sanders not request a recount then?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:20 PM
May 2016

Because Kentucky used black box no paper trail voting machines in many counties, so theres no way to recount those votes.

WhiteTara

(29,703 posts)
3. I think it is because he is virtually broke
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

and a recount would take money from his campaign ads (Jeff and Tad would have sad over that too)

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
5. SWING AND A MISS
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:35 PM
May 2016

no you cannot physically do a recount in voting boxes that do not have a physical record. This is a well known issue among election accountability activists.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
4. Theres nothing wrong with black box voting machines
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:29 PM
May 2016

As long as Hillary is the one who wins with them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders campaign declines...