Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post) Post removed May 2016 OP
Just more ammo for the GE if Hillary makes it unfortunately NWCorona May 2016 #1
Prediction: Hillarians will attack the messenger TheSarcastinator May 2016 #2
I'm so glad DU is here to give Republican hatchet jobs more press. Recursion May 2016 #3
told you so TheSarcastinator May 2016 #4
I bow to you Recursion May 2016 #7
Sorry. I am a Bernie supporter, but this Republican is not someone we need to be promoting-- tblue37 May 2016 #16
Did you also predict that the Sandriods have propagated so much hate on DU, that Hillary supporters: anotherproletariat May 2016 #22
all I see there is that he was a U.S. attorney, a football player... grasswire May 2016 #6
Republican candidate for Senate. For fucks sake Recursion May 2016 #9
No, they can read. They've lost the ability to think critically. TwilightZone May 2016 #21
FACT isn't non-partisan. It's very right-wing. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #11
Wait, are you telling me, that just because they SAY they're "non-partisan" MH1 May 2016 #18
NOT "nonpartisan--but a CONSERVATIVE "watchdog" group, and he is a RW Republican. nt tblue37 May 2016 #19
Yup. Its been pretty gross around here. timlot May 2016 #20
You might not want to put too much stock in this: FACT is actually a right-wing group. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #5
Bingo! But Bernie-ites are so desperate that they will grasp at anything. tonyt53 May 2016 #8
I am, in fact, a Sanders supporter. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #10
Some of us here don't follow a narrative or have an agenda 24-7. Rex May 2016 #14
I report, you decide. grasswire May 2016 #13
FACT is a conservative watchdog group run by a Republican politician. Arkansas Granny May 2016 #12
and? grasswire May 2016 #15
Bogus RW scandal is worth review? I'll wait until there is any BootinUp May 2016 #23
The guy who runs FACT thinks that all judges should have a "biblical view of justice". TwilightZone May 2016 #17

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
2. Prediction: Hillarians will attack the messenger
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:33 PM
May 2016

Get ready to hear all about how the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust is a communist/GOP/misogynist organization that hates freedum.

Alternate Hillarian response: why do you love Trump?

That should cover it.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
4. told you so
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:35 PM
May 2016

My psychic powers are supreme.

You missed the second half, though. You should really edit your post so that it ends with an accusation of pro-Trump sympathies on the part of the poster.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. I bow to you
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:36 PM
May 2016

You predicted a liberal Democrat (I'm a Sanders voter, btw) would get irritated when a piece by a Republican piece of shit is posted on a Democratic website.

Your intuition is truly amazing

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
16. Sorry. I am a Bernie supporter, but this Republican is not someone we need to be promoting--
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016

or trusting. I don't think it is an accident that most of the politicians he slams in the OP excerpt are Democrats.

Matthew G. Whitaker . . . is a lawyer and Republican politician. Whitaker is Executive Director of The Foundation for Accountability & Civic Trust (FACT), a conservative, nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting accountability, ethics, and transparency in government <emphasis added>.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Whitaker


This group and Judicial Watch are not impartial critics; on the contrary, they are intensely partisan right wing organizations. I hate to see anti-Democratic material from them uncritically quoted here on DU.
 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
22. Did you also predict that the Sandriods have propagated so much hate on DU, that Hillary supporters:
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:44 PM
May 2016

1. No longer believe anything you say, do, or post

2. Would never change allegiances

3. Are loving watching the slow, painful death of the Sanders campaign

AND

4. Have a new motivation in seeing and working for the relegation to irrelevance of both Sanders and his ideals.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
6. all I see there is that he was a U.S. attorney, a football player...
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:36 PM
May 2016

...a sometime politico, and heads up a nonpartisan watchdog group.

Whatevah.

TwilightZone

(25,428 posts)
21. No, they can read. They've lost the ability to think critically.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:43 PM
May 2016

They've also lost the ability to view things in context, like the context of the guy who runs FACT being a right-wing loon.

MH1

(17,573 posts)
18. Wait, are you telling me, that just because they SAY they're "non-partisan"
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016

that doesn't always mean they really ARE "non-partisan"?

Well, I never! I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya ....

 

timlot

(456 posts)
20. Yup. Its been pretty gross around here.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:43 PM
May 2016

Its over for Bernie. But, his cause could live on through Hillary if the put as much energy into getting her to adopt his policy as appose to tearing down our eventual nominee.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,587 posts)
5. You might not want to put too much stock in this: FACT is actually a right-wing group.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:35 PM
May 2016

More here:

As we and others have noted, the Judicial Crisis Network, the primary outside group backing the Senate GOP’s blockade of President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, is funded almost entirely by a dark-money group connected to a single family of conservative donors.

On Friday, Open Secrets uncovered that the same dark-money network funding JCN is behind another group that is working to oppose Merrick Garland’s nomination: the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT).

Open Secrets reports that FACT, which styles itself as a right-wing alternative to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), receives all of its funding through Donor’s Trust, a donor-advised fund that acts as a “pass-through vessel” for conservative funders, making the source of contributions all but impossible to trace. But Open Secrets found evidence linking FACT to the Corkery family, who are behind a number of conservative groups including JCN. JCN and FACT share a treasurer, Neil Corkery, and FACT has the same front address as a number of Corkery-linked groups.

The executive director of FACT and the sole paid employee listed on its most recent tax filing is Matt Whitaker, a former U.S. Attorney from Iowa who we here at Right Wing Watch remember from his unsuccessful run for his home state’s Republican Senate nomination in 2014 (it ultimately went to now-Sen. Joni Ernst). When asked at a debate what criteria he would use to determine whether to support or attempt to block President Obama’s federal judicial nominees, Whitaker said that he would ask if nominees are “people of faith” and “have a biblical view of justice.”


- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/leader-anti-garland-group-once-demanded-judges-have-biblical-view-justice#sthash.DWZ07Kwh.dpuf

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
13. I report, you decide.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:39 PM
May 2016

This is the kind of attack that HRC is going to face ad nauseum from this day forward.

I have no trouble considering the veracity of what the right has to say about her. Are the charges true? Are they not?

Everyone here has the brainpower to evaluate for themselves.

But Hillaryans better stop hiding their heads in the sand and toughen up.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
15. and?
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:40 PM
May 2016

Please review the charges they have made, and tell us why they are true or not true.

This is just the beginning of the onslaught.

BootinUp

(47,078 posts)
23. Bogus RW scandal is worth review? I'll wait until there is any
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:44 PM
May 2016

indication it is being taken seriously.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Post removed