Sound familiar?

[catnhatnh]

A Yale educated lawyer, married to a Yale educated lawyer, represented by more than adequate legal counsel is cleared because while she made false statements, perhaps she was naive when giving testimony...



Hillary Clinton gradually came under scrutiny for allegedly having played a central role in XXXXX and making false statements about her role in it. In 20XX, XXXXX Counsel XXXXXXXX issued his final report on XXXXXXX. He sought no charges against her, saying that while some of Clinton's statements were factually false, there was insufficient evidence that these statements were either knowingly false or that she understood that her statements led to the firings.


Watkins memo also said "we both know that there would be hell to pay" if "we failed to take swift and decisive action in conformity with the First Lady's wishes."[39] This memo contradicted the First Lady's previous statements in the GAO investigation, that she had played no role in the firings and had not consulted with Thomason beforehand

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_travel_office_controversy

More of the same to come...

[SheilaT]

1. And to think, the person who made factually false statements is an attorney.

And has held various high offices.

I think that someone with so passing an acquaintance with the truth simply isn't fit for any sort of high office.

WHAT??? She's running for President?? Oh, my dear sweet lord. There's no hope.