2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPSA: Pay No Attention to Articles Claiming Clinton Leads in Oregon!
Public Service Announcement:
New Articles Claiming Clinton Leads
in Oregon Are Lies
Greetings, my friends! This is just a quick Math Vs. Media Public Service announcement please pay no attention to the flood of news that is claiming that Clinton leads in the Oregon polls. All of them are based off of the same crappy survey a crappy survey of a mere 304 likely voters, 2 of which said they werent voting, knocking that down to 302 people.
The survey does not even state that these 302 are democrats (the only group that can vote in the Oregon democratic primaries) and, because theyre listing the surveyed people as likely voters, not registered voters, one can only assume that the company, DHM Research, which conducted this survey, either
a.) Knows that some of them arent registered
or
b.) Doesnt know whether they are registered or not.
Furthermore, the survey does not reveal its methodology Ive searched their website and cant even find information about whether it was a landline, cellphone, or internet survey! (In their FAQ, they state that they use internet surveys & cell-phone surveys).
At the very least, even if we assume that the 302 people are registered democratic voters and that it wast an internet survey, were looking at about a 9-10% margin of error (±7% for the sample size and ±2-3% for using cell-phones), which is more than the survey says Clinton leads by. Therefore, the survey could potentially mean the opposite of what it says it means. I have called DHM Research repeatedly to inquire further but they have not picked up.
more: https://johnlaurits.com/2016/05/11/psa-pay-no-attention-to-articles-claiming-clinton-leads-in-oregon/
MADem
(135,425 posts)Ooops.
This link has the same number polled--nine hundred and one: http://q13fox.com/2016/05/10/new-polls-shows-likely-voters-favoring-clinton-over-sanders-in-oregon-week-before-democratic-primary/
I think that blogger you are citing needs GLASSES....or a more recent poll.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)I have doubts about the poll too, but the post has been completely refuted
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But this article is an absolute joke. Goodman worthy.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Likely voters are typically those who have voted in the recent past. Which means not only are they registered, but they actually currently vote. The place LV might be weak is in determining how/whether to count those who have not voted in past elections only because they were not yet of age, and how that relates to the fact that younger voters skew heavily toward Bernie.