HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Storm aftermath not likel...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Oct 30, 2012, 11:10 AM

Storm aftermath not likely to delay election

For all you bed-wetters and hand-wringers . . .




By NBC's Pete Williams, 10-30-12, posted on NBCNews.com

The answer is, yes, it could undoubtedly be delayed. But it almost certainly won't be.

The Constitution gives Congress the authority to establish the day for presidential elections, and since 1845, a federal law has set the date as "the Tuesday after the first Monday in November." Congress could change the date, just as it could change any federal statute. But it would have to act quickly.

And of course, it's the states, not the federal government, that run elections in America. Many states in areas not affected by Sandy's wrath would be likely to oppose a delay and its attendant costs. They could choose to go ahead with their elections for all but president and have a separate election for president later. But such a move would undoubtedly suppress the turnout.

Past disasters, including weather emergencies, have forced postponement of state and local elections. New York state suspended its primary election in 2001 -- on September 11th, the day of the suicide hijack attacks. But few states have a regular procedure for doing it. Florida, with its long experience in dealing with hurricanes, is one of the few with specific procedures in place, allowing the governor to suspend or delay elections.

John Fortier, a nationally respected expert on presidential elections, points out additional problems, writing on a blog sponsored by the Moritz School of Law at Ohio State University.

"If voting were disrupted and postponed in one state," Fortier says, "then we will likely know the results in all the other states before voting can resume in the affected state. If the affected state or states are determinative of the electoral college outcome, the pressure and focus on that one state would be enormous."

Among other questions, he says, are what to do with votes already cast.

Finally, consider the fact that never before the U.S. history has a presidential election been postponed or canceled, not even during the Civil War.



http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/30/14804199-storm-aftermath-not-likely-to-delay-election?lite

2 replies, 548 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Storm aftermath not likely to delay election (Original post)
fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 OP
Sunlei Oct 2012 #1
LisaL Oct 2012 #2

Response to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Tue Oct 30, 2012, 11:15 AM

1. The Vote will be fine. Plenty of emergency gens. and close neighbor districts with full power

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sunlei (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 30, 2012, 11:16 AM

2. Considering on election day you are supposed to vote in your disctrict, what good are

neighboring districts with power going to do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread