2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSandernista rebels are so rebellious and so radical they're going to stay home and pout
A friend of mine just said this to me and I had to repeat it here.
Talk about summarizing this whole thing succinctly.
BTW, the person who said this is like me, a Bernie voter. But I guess, like me, a different type of Bernie voter than many we find here at this political message board.
(of course staying home and pouting, and voting 3rd party, are the same thing because we have TWO choices in November, sorry to break the bad news)
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I'm sure it will be funny to everybody that hears it.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)and adults who have been around a while, we know what fascism will do to this country if certain folks pout and dont vote.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I am not pouting. I am behaving like an adult. As an adult I refuse to be manipulated or guilted into voting for Hillary the neocon who is participating in the corporate corruption that has infected our democracy and has turned out political system into a laughing stock.
I also have to say, you may want to work on your diplomacy. I will never vote for her. However, there are most likely some Bernie supporters who will. You're not going to win them over by speaking as you are, and acting like a bully. It's very ugly.
It depends on what your goals are. If you're oh-so concerned about "what fascism will do to this country" (your words) you may want to try softening up the insults.
Eko
(7,245 posts)I tell you that Clinton is in no way a neocon, a neoliberal sure but not a neocon. As far as corporate corruption that has infected our democracy I would tell you that you have a very poor grasp on the history of politics and money in our country. Diplomacy? " I will never vote for her." Your words, how is that diplomatic? Everyone here wants to lessen the influence money has on our country, its not like you are the only one. You just expect it to happen overnight when it has been going on for 240 years and if it doesn't happen you will take your vote and go home. Doesn't sound very adult-like.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Will at least the fridge finally get cleaned out? LOL
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I realize you are concerned about this, but the real problem is not the relatively small number of people who will deliberately not vote out of anger because Bernie lost.
The bigger problem, and where you should be aiming your fire if you want to change it, are the people who have been so turned off by politics that they just don't give a shit. They don't post on DU or go to rallies.
They're not pissed at Clinton or the Democrats specifically except as member of en entire political system that they see as useless and meaningless. They see the gridlock and the inaction of both parties as equally corrupt and irrelevant to their lives. It's the Apathy and Cynicism Party.
Bernie helped to counter that, by offering a pro-active agenda, and honest assessment of the situation, which got many people involved....Now it's up to Clinton and the Democrats to give them a reason to stay involved.
But there is also that larger subset of people who didn't pay attention to Sanders, don't care whether its the GOP or Democrats and will either not get engaged or may get sucked into voting for Trump.
I'm serious. If you want to aim your fire somewhere, that's what you should focus on rather than beating up people who are curren;ly mad at Clinton. That larger apathy is also going to make a difference in the ultimate outcome.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)never becomes one.
What he has done, creating all this interest in young people, has never been done before.
Now what do we do with it?
We form local groups and elect locally etc
artislife
(9,497 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Do you even grasp the concept if the word?
I'm not sure that you do.
But, please do repeat what your friend said to everybod that can hear you.
I'm sure it will be well recieved.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Please go shake your fist at all those who are turned off by incremental fascism...seeing how you choked in answering to that.
I won't be voting for Goldman's Sacks, hellfire missles or the same corrupt establishment that wants to fu@k us with TPP.
But you go right agead and beat that drum if you must.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)important
Yes, we all heard you.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)then?
Incremental invasions, bombings of brown-skinned people, undeclared wars are not my bag. Perhaps that's your trade off fir planned parenthood.
Fall in line, vote, bombs away!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Have fun supporting Hilly's bombing of the Persians if she becomes POTUS.
You care about life? Think about that while you sit on your high horse.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)I live in a red state, so for all practical purposes I already had my Presidential election.
The idea that I need to be frightened into voting for candidate and group (Clinton and the Corporate Dems - I.E. "socially liberal and fiscally conservative) is repellent to me. This election (if Clinton is the nominee) is like voting for the nicest hired thug: the guy holding your arms behind your back telling you to give up (No, we can't!) or the guy who really enjoys giving you a beating. Neither is really on my side.
It might go better for the Democratic Party if they made a concentrated effort to "suck" less, or not at all. They don't fight for voting rights. They don't fight for liberal ideas (oh but they want liberals to vote for them though). They mostly don't fight for the rights of African Americans. They're a bit better on women's rights, but they haven't returned to the ERA yet. When they do fight, it's kind of half-hearted and they give up quickly. Doesn't matter if they're in the majority or minority they let the republicans drive the agenda, frame the question, and define the language used.
Just look at "Obamacare". It's basically Bob Dole's fig leaf plan from the 90's that covered the fact that republicans didn't have a healthcare plan for Americans.
Is Clinton really going to defend abortion rights?
Bernie Sanders opposes all abortion restictions. Hillary Clinton's stance is murkier.[
...During a Fox News town hall on Monday night, Clinton and Sanders were asked about their position on late-term abortions. Sanders' stance was easy to discern: He opposes abortion restrictions, full stop. Clinton's answer was murkier. She began her response to moderator Bret Baier with a broad defense of a woman's right to an abortion, mentioning the current Supreme Court case involving Texas' anti-abortion regulations and the continued Republican attacks on Planned Parenthood. But Baier persisted on the matter of late-term abortions, asking, "Just to be clear, there's nowithout any exceptions?"
Ads by ZINC
Clinton replied, "NoI have been on record in favor of a late-pregnancy regulation that would have exceptions for the life and health of the mother."
In the exchange, Clinton seems to support limited bans on late-term abortions after a fetus is viable (about 24 weeks into a pregnancy). Her campaign has said nothing to contradict this. Asked to clarify Clinton's position, a campaign spokesperson responded in an email:
Politicians should not interfere with a woman's personal medical decisions, which should be left to a woman in consultation with her doctor.
She also recognizes that Roe v. Wade provides that restrictions are constitutional later in pregnancy so long as there are clear exceptions for the life and health of the woman.
Clinton has consistently made clear her support for exceptions to any late-term abortion regulations, such as when the life or mental or physical health of the mother is at risk. She would also consider restrictions only after about the 24-week mark, when a fetus is considered viable, in keeping with the Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/hillary-clinton-late-term-abortions
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)the director of PP's daughter is interning with Hillary's campaign BTW
reddread
(6,896 posts)you be?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Personally I think they will vote for Jill. And it's not going to take a single vote away from Hillary, because they never ever planned to vote for her anyway. It will be interesting to see. As for me I am still waiting for June to make a final decision.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,523 posts)I don't know any Bernie supporters who are going to behave like this.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)or the posts about not voting if she wins?
I have, I have seen many like that.
And clearly it is happening all over the place, thus this comment from someone who has experienced these type of supporters elsewhere.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Why don't you go whine at them?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Why do they owe you anything?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)That they're willing to vote on the down-ballot?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)She won't vote for her but I asked her clearly and she supports the down-ballot and WILL vote there.
I just believe they can be convinced to go down-ballot.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Some right here on DU.
Here is why it is absurd.
ALL politicians fit into the category Hillary belongs in, Bernie doesnt but Bernie is ONE person.
By saying you can vote for him but not her you are saying that NOW the ONLY politician they will vote for has to be pure, otherwise they are out.
ARGHH
TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)Not everyone is going to go along with the DNC program and corporate agenda. Why should we unite with a group who have been bashing us and casting us as commie crazies for months on end. Your inevitability politics did this. Now reap the rewards!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Excuse me, seriously.
You see I was a teenager in the 60's, with this attitude we would still be fighting in Vietnam.
TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)and I am not a teenager and this conversation has nothing to do with Vietnam. It's the 2010s and I am a working man who sees my government being bought and sold by the super rich while the rest of us are being told to eat cake. You cannot piss in my face and tell me it's raining. We will not go with the program. Anyone who was against the Vietnam war in the 60s should see what we are about very clearly. Enough going along to get along. We are trying to do this peacefully. If the ballot box has been bought and sold then we will speak with our spending habits. If they still won't listen to us then we will take it in a different direction. We will not be held hostage by your generation.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)The only language these vultures seem to understand is money so when the mass boycotting begins and they see their profit margins narrowing, then perhaps we can start to get somewhere. We have had it with the establishment. We've HAD IT!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)not voting for the Democrat.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)but now it expects us all to go smooch smooch.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Not me, I am in this for everybody, not just myself.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)TY For the piss-poor deflection though.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)He's got to earn his position in the Clinton camp doncha know. He thinks by calling himself a Bernie supporter that it elevates him to a position where he has more credibility in attacking Sanders supporter thereby getting kudos from the Hillary supporters. He's been posting these kind of threads on a regular basis and they get more shrill as time goes by.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)That is the whole basis of democracy.
What we don't need is asinine lectures (like the last three phone calls I received over this week) telling me that if I don't vote Hillary, that I am dooming our country.
To my mind, and from my experience with her, voting for her would be dooming this country. If she changes (R I G H T !) and honestly adopts more liberal positions, becomes anti-war, and goes after criminals in Wall Street, then perhaps she could earn my support.
But for her to say crap like she did about the death of Ghadaffi, and shrugging off her personal responsibility and input into the destruction of Libya, Syria, and the Ukraine, it is ever harder for her to earn my vote.
artislife
(9,497 posts)so this just may be insider information...or it is an effing meme!
smh
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)Bless that Colace.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)fascist is shit?
You see if you are a liberal, then what I am doing is what all liberals are doing.
Anybody who claims to be a liberal CANT defend actions that elect fascists, you do understand that I hope.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)Do you have something special everyone else around here lacks?
And how many straight days of posting this....nonsense...is this for you now?
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and I stand by it. You have no stroke or power to tell anyone what to do, how to vote. You may feel A Ok with voting for more of the same. You may be A OK with voting corporatist sell out. I'm not, and will not do it , no matter how much you whine, no matter how much you moan, weep, or gnash your tooth. I will not vote for a republican , even if offered for sale as a democrat.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)And like I told a friend who I have been friends with for decades when he said he would vote for Trump over Hillary, see ya.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and secretly always have, Hillary.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)you I am willing to be money.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Your beluevability is about as legitimate as a three dollar bill...IMHO.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)CanadaexPat
(496 posts)will thank us. Their alleys have been bombed away.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)issues in this presidential election for the vast majority of the population. But there are some few here who have decided that they are above those issues.
We need to not waste our energy on them. This election, as you point out, is too important.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Right on the head with that one.
"I WILL NEVER..." I believe them.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)acting as if they cant or wont vote for the Democrat.
This is very serious business for me, I tried nicely for months here to talk sense into these people, but they arent hearing it.
So now I guess I have to be blunt.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)that your arrogance and condescension haven't drawn more progressives to Team Hillary...
A regular Dale Carnegie you are...
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)a democrat in name only. and a horse's ass.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But this is kinda ridiculous.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)my friend is wrong?
Lets look at it word by word, I dont think you can.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)That's what I'm talking about. Why do you feel the need to insult me and others? Like I said, even though I happen to occasionally disagree I've never disrespected you or your opinion.
Now to your question as to where I think you and your friend are wrong.
I think it is counter productive to expect or rather demand that people fall in line with their candidate's opponent when the race isnt over. Whether or not you'd like to admit it or not, Bernie isn't out yet. I'd be the first to admit that his path now is extremely narrow after last night but it's not impossible.
Once an official nominee has been selected and it happens to be Hillary. Feel free to go all out on the Bernie or bust crowd.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)for word, but I was sloppy and you may not have read it that way.
sorry
This isnt about whether the race is over yet, it is about those who have already declared they wont vote for Hillary.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)It's very easy to get things construed. My favorite example!
I know you mean the ones who say they won't vote if it's not their candidate. What I'm saying is that people have so much emotion invested in who they are caping for that it's only natural that a portion of supporters would hold this viewpoint. All I ask is for you to tone down the venom until after it becomes clear and apparent and finally sunk it. There's enough time between the elections for you to make your point. Trust me if it was the other way around. Some Hillary supporters would be saying the same thing.
Gotta heal before we can rebuild.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)So many classics between those two and I can't wait for Keanu! My son is begging me to take him lol! It might be the first R rated movie I take him to but I have to preview it first to make sure
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Way to win friends and influence people!
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)with politics.
How in the HELL could what my friend said have ANY god DAMN impact on what YOU an ADULT will do when presented with whether or not to vote against a person who wants women to FUCKING DIE in back alleys?
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Or the brown women and children dying now in Honduras' civil war (gotta deport those kids back to teach their parents a lesson! )
Most importantly she also doesn't care about the millions of Americans who are certainly going to die in the upcoming weather and environmental catastrophes. Or the many millions across the planet who are already starting to die in places like the Sudanese drought (climate change culprit), or in mega storms like Hurricane Sandy which has been documented as having been greatly amplified by climate change, or during severe heat waves which weren't even listed as a threat in 1970 because they didn't even exist. Now they're one of the leading causes of death. Russia's heat wave in 2010 killed 55,000 people.
Some people are seeing a much bigger picture than abortion even - they're voting for a candidate to ensure they'll have a clear conscience in 5 years when the shit hits the fan...
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)think it is worth 5 minutes of your time to vote against that.
Sounds pretty damn selfish to me.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That would elect a peanut butter sandwich if they were the Democratic nominee.
They can vote Jill Stein without any harm to Hillary. But here you are crapping all over anyone who won't vote for Hillary. Its a shitty purity pledge.
Some folks actually have a conscience and believe a vote for Hillary is an explicit endorsement of her and the evil shit that's coming if/when she's elected. You're crapping all over them at this stage only hardens their position and ensures they'll never pull the lever for Hillary.
Hillarys willing to consider constitutional amendments on abortion. Some folks feel strongly about voting against Hillarys position on that and believe their write-in vote is their protest.
The GOP's climate change position dooms the planet as surely as Hillarys incrementalism. Jill Stein is unconditionally pro-choice and pro-environmental action asap as is Bernie. Voting for them (Bernie as a write in) isn't selfish to those voters at all, in fact just the opposite.
Your lack of nuance is a mistake imo.
Good luck with it.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And obviously you don't want to hear anything but a purity pledge.
Hillarys going to have to win people over, not just demand their vote.
Democracy doesn't work that way.
The ball's in her court now. She's got to persuade Bernie voters.
If she loses, its her fault for not persuading them. It's 100% on her.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)inexperienced people.
NO politician has EVER won me over, other than Bernie.
And I worked my ASS off for Obama and others.
Do you understand what that means?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Or they'd get John Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran McCain who is every bit as scary and delusional as Trump.
He went out and earned Hillary supporters' votes.
Sure he didn't get all of them but he damn sure didn't try strong arming them with threats which is what you're doing, this tactic will fail badly with the national mood right now.
Hillary must win Bernie supporters.
byyiminy
(39 posts)That's exactly what you are doing.
Yumin' Yiminy!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Should point out to whoever is looking at this poster, they have posted only once, are new, and are doing it only to me.
I consider that very troubling.
Marr
(20,317 posts)That's what she needs from you now.
Or you can just keep having fun with childish trolling on the intarweb. Either way.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Mostly polls are coming back that Sanders supporters will easily be able to vote for Clinton. They are probably the ones that made it to vote for Sanders in the first place.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)To vote on come November, not just who is the next POTUS.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)It must be nice to not have a set of principles by which to determine your vote.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)some idiot on the internet said something?
No, right?
I hope not.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)HRC isn't going to be able to appease Bernie with a cabinet position.
HRC needs to develop a coalition with solid policy if she is capable.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)you won't vote for Hillary, and therefore the argument is futile and not worth the energy. You have chosen to make yourself a non-factor in the discussions going forward on the presidential election.
It's a big difference.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)When people say they can't or won't vote for HRC, its because of what she has said or done so far.
She has 6 months to earn the votes of those who voted in the Democratic Primary, but struggle with the idea of voting for her.
If she can't build a coalition with people to whom she (and Bill) hasn't offered Federal jobs and millions in foundation money for initiatives, then maybe you're right and its pointless.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)can actually do to them) and Sanders supporters saying they are going to take themselves away and people believing them.
That's a difference in substance.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)I can see why you think there is a difference.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)Well, this didn't take long for TeamHRC to be absolutely explicit.
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/4/25/do-what-you-want-an-open-letter-to-the-bernie-or-bust-movement-on-behalf-of-the-democratic-party#.VyKmDIJZpia.facebook
Squinch
(50,911 posts)If it is any consolation to you, Mildred Peabody said, "We really want your vote, aikoaiko. And we think you are very handsome, and a good dancer." So did Reginald Fishbottom, though your looks seemed less important to him.
aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)It is what it is.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Clintonistas are sore losers and even worse winners.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I plan on voting, just not for your shity trickledown warmongering right wing candidate.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)if he wants to.
If not kill, surely make 2nd class citizens.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Tptb got their candidate, but not my vote.
Take up issue with tptb. My vote is mine.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Big talk about revolution but the first time you dont get your way, you walk?
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)my political enemies. No one can make me.
G_j
(40,366 posts)or your "friend" are Bernie voters. Given that, anything you say rings quite insincere.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)every time one of you newcomers to politics accuses me of not being a Bernie voter.
G_j
(40,366 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)DFab420
(2,466 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)DFab420
(2,466 posts)Pretty sure your posts will explain themselves
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)a so called Bernie supporter that I am not one.
Sad.
But you dont know any better, I guess.
DFab420
(2,466 posts)what you choose to share.
I see a lot of double speak from you.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)what you mean.
yes, all of my posts are about how I support Bernie but will support Hillary if I have to and why you are not a liberal if you dont.
I know, who am I to decide who is and isnt a liberal.
But i did.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Svafa
(594 posts)and neoliberal warhawk, I'll pass. Thankfully those aren't the only choices. Sadly, one of them will likely win regardless.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)and pout.
I will stand up and fight.
Thanks.
840high
(17,196 posts)Bernie
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)A number of Sanders supporters here are truly fine with Clinton.
brewens
(13,538 posts)are true independents for going that way though. Hillary should have done something other than "steal the Bern" when convenient to attract them.
If tRump wins, it is going to be interesting. The GOP leadership has shown they feel like he's a real wildcard. It could really be that he can't be pushed around. Any rotten dealing and he may just go full on "Bullworth" over it. And I really wish I could feel the same about Hillary. I'd love it if she gave a speech more or less saying, "thanks for the money suckers, but there's a new sheriff in town!" Then really went out and tried to do what I hope Bernie could do. There's not much to make us think she has that in her.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)of actual Revolutions...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_revolutions_and_rebellions
Had all been successful with hardcore pouting.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)act out against the citizens.
AMAZING
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)Apparently an irrelevant one at that.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)And I will. Without Bernie there will be no viable choices.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I won't vote for a republican ever. That includes Hillary. DINO
MFM008
(19,803 posts)you stole my insult!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If, on the other hand, you believe that browbeating people will produce the result you're looking for, you're wasting time.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Do you? Honestly? Because derision and childish taunting always work?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)vote now?
WOW
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I will vote, down ballot races are important. I had ZERO intention on voting for Henry Kissinger's favorite candidate before, and am no more inclined now.
However, you seem to think that dancing a jig and grinding people's faces in the mud is going to help your candidate.
Good luck with that.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)I just dont understand why you are on a liberal message board, that is all.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and Wall Street apologists.
Pretend she's a liberal, whatever helps you sleep nights.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)that seems far down your list of concerns.
That and a whole list of social issues I could mention.
Very selfish.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)in other countries HRC will bomb.
Oh, wait, they don't count. They aren't white or "American", so screw them. Maybe they can raise enough money on Kickstarter to pay for her to give them a speech, and THEN they might matter.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)So if i go to the African American section of this or any board I will see you posting constantly about non white problems?
I know you will find ME, what about you?
Nah, I bet no before I even look.
Kickstarter?
What in the hell?
Who are you?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)women and children have died, continue to die, and will die when HRC continues the policies of illegal war?
Also, don't know what you are you are implying. Are you saying that I must go to a special section of this board in order to protest racial injustice, and if I don't it doesn't count?
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)We just may vote for someone else.
Nice Bernie supporter. I still have not seen one post where you support Bernie Sanders. What a fake.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)And I have so few of you that I can read, your posts stand out.
Firstly, because I like Jackie Wilson and his incredible voice.
You have been a very light supporter of Bernie from the beginning. I have seen your posts because you confused me by sounding like a h supporter but always adding the phrase you were a Bernie supporter.
Yet, I have never read one word of actual support of any of his issues...nothing. nada.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)that would mean a real supporter is someone open and evolved enough to see the big picture, when necessary.
You cant, I guess.
artislife
(9,497 posts)So when did being a warmonger become okay?
When did selling Fracking around the world become okay?
When did being a shill for Wall Street become okay?
if this became okay, I say you never really thought they were a problem in the first place.
But whatever, Jackie...whatever.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Excuse me, really, please do.
You see I was a teenager in the 60's, with this attitude we would still be fighting in Vietnam.
artislife
(9,497 posts)TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)and then touch their toes.
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)The ole kiss up and kick down mentality. I remember when this was discussed concerning John Bolton
"a quintessential kiss-up, kick-down sort of guy"
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-04-12-bolton_x.htm
me b zola
(19,053 posts)If exercising my right to vote constitutes "pouting" to you that seems like that is your problem. It certainly isn't a problem to/for me.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)an enemy of their institution by not voting AGAINST the fascists.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)in anger is not welcomed by many of us.
Planned Parenthood does not "target ME as an enemy of their institution". Why would you insinuate something so nasty about one of the best institutions in the US? I understand that PP endorsed Hillary, but Hillary has said that she is open to negotiate with anti-choicers. Bernie OTOH has been quite consistent in that he believes that a women's health care is no one's business but hers--Bernie trusts women and is ride or die for the cause of women's reproductive rights.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)around here but apparently not by many.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Because you want something badly does not give you the right to begin a call out thread and proceed to fill the response page with repeated personal attacks on DUers. You couldn't make your case to a number of responders so you kept attacking posters experience, knowledge and repeatedly referred to some DUers as children/babies.
Like I said, I don't know what your deal is, but you are out of line.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)That was really weird and odious and I would really like for you to explain that to me.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)wont vote for whoever the Dem is, you are targeting them for destruction, maybe I got that backwards
It is YOU targeting THEM
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Toodles.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)That sure is the grown up way to go.
Weird, my candidate is Bernie and they didnt endorse him and I am not telling them to go to hell.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)You continue to assign beliefs and words to me that have nothing to do with me. Meanwhile, you still have not explained that weirdness when you said that Planned Parenthood was "targeting" me. What does that even mean?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)you did and I support him WAY more than you because unlike some I will do what he does if he loses.
Bernie or bust people dont support Bernie.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I'll let you guess what the second thing is.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)do to Roe and women's rights and sit here and say they wont vote for Hillary
not in a million years
merrily
(45,251 posts)I asked you that about a week ago. You provided no link, yet you keep saying or implying I said it. In my book, that makes you quite dishonest.
See also http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=363091
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)You said "which olive branch is Hillary offering us?"
I took that to mean you needed one to vote for her, if not, then fine.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)God help us, please tell me these people were not going to vote in the first place.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I could write in Mickey Mouse and it wouldn't matter.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)I've been a loyal, straight ticket Democratic voter for 25 years. Now my vote will have to be earned instead of taken for granted. You seem to be the one having a temper tantrum. Sorry to break it to you.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)who might be sincere, and if they are, they simply dont understand American politics and what is actually at stake.
Yep, that has to be it, sure some here are GOP plants, but the rest simply dont understand or care.
I mean those who threaten not to vote Democrat, that is.
Oh well.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)You are doing nothing but burning bridges, whenever I read a post like this it reinforces my decision to vote for Jill Stein. Sorry but you do not own my vote, if you want to win my vote then make your case but don't think attacking people like me is going to help you win us over.
You and everyone else who is going on the attack against people who have doubts about Clinton are going to ensure that lots of people will be switching to the Green Party.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Someone who truly wanted to win my vote would not talk down to me like you are. I will be thinking of you when I cast my vote for Jill Stein.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)When I read nastiness coming from people like you however it reinforces my opinion that I should vote for Jill Stein and encourage others to vote for her as well. Thank you for motivating me to get out the vote for Stein.
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #165)
pa28 This message was self-deleted by its author.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)I guess it feels good in a vengeful kind of way to cheer on the "Bernie or Bust" thing, and they want to see the person who beat Bernie lose so that Hillary supporters will feel as bad as they do now. Those are human emotions.
But anyone who is actually going to sit home and let Trump win, I have no idea what they are thinking. What good will that accomplish? It's so obvious that Hillary is so much superior to Trump, compared to Trump the difference between Hillary and Bernie is very small.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)everything in his power to prevent GOP from WH.
Wait, he did, TODAY
and yet some of you still claim to support him...
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)Does the fact that we declare ourselves as democrats mean that we should negate everything we know about a candidate and vote for them out of fear of the alternative? Because, No!
Do we want smart informed voters or do we want them to just accept whatever party hack presented to them and give up evaluating them?
Even though I think She is dreadfully wrong for the Job because of her Blood-thirst for war, I would only vote for her if I lived in a Swing state(Which I don't) . I will vote. I won't stay home.
Maybe she can convince me to vote for her.
It's her job to earn my vote NOT my job to give it to her.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Adults do not talk down, condescend, insult, and demand loyalty of other adults in a democracy.
Yes, they act like this in authoritarian Communist and Fascist regimes, and this speaks volume.
So fine, continue insulting adult voters. Go right ahead and attack us with your arrogant narcissism. Because yes, it is you who are pouting like a small child who can not get their way. Those mean and bad objects out there won't bend to my will. They won't act the way I want them to act. They are acting like they have independent minds and are capable of independent actions even if I don't want them to act this way.
See a therapist, talk to a preacher, ask a partner or friend to listen to you as you run this shit passed them. And listen very carefully to them asking you why you feel the need to act this way, communicate this way, and be as childish as you are.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)FFS
Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Original post)
Th1onein This message was self-deleted by its author.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)yeah, that sound about 'radical' enough to me - a.k.a. sensible.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Please don't say neither since we know from your OP that is not an option.
And yes, I view the choice you are giving us, as that bad.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)likes war for war sake, cheney only for profit so his wars would be limited.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine that applies to a relatively small number of both Sanders and Clinton supporters.