Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts) Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:27 PM Oct 2012

1996 & 2000's Most Accurate Pollster -Obama 50% Robemeandyou 47%

Mitt Romney’s first debate bounce has evaporated and President Obama once again has taken a slim lead in The Washington Times/Zogby Poll released Sunday night

Read more: Obama leads in latest poll as Romney loses bounce - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/21/obama-leads-in-latest-poll-as-romneyloses-bounce/?page=1&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=RSS_Feed#ixzz29zVBhw77
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

1996 & 2000's Most Accurate Pollster -Obama 50% Robemeandyou 47% (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 OP

Maybe the OLD Zogby..... LenaBaby61 Oct 2012 #1

Washington Times???????????? bluescribbler Oct 2012 #2

It isn't even Zogby. FBaggins Oct 2012 #3

My Post Was Tongue In Cheek But He Is Still Involved In The Organization DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #4

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)

1. Maybe the OLD Zogby.....

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:34 PM

Oct 2012

But THIS 2012 Model WITH the Washington Times...

.......

bluescribbler

(2,116 posts)

2. Washington Times????????????

Reply to LenaBaby61 (Reply #1)

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:36 PM

Oct 2012

Isn't that the Moonies' paper???????????

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)

3. It isn't even Zogby.

Reply to LenaBaby61 (Reply #1)

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:44 PM

Oct 2012

IIRC, he sold the name to an international company and they work with both WaTimes and newsmax.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)

4. My Post Was Tongue In Cheek But He Is Still Involved In The Organization

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #3)

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:49 PM

Oct 2012

And he did nail 96 and 00, predicting a substantial win for Clinton in 96 but not the blowout many pollsters predicted, and a narrow win for Gore which practically no pollster predicted.

Reply to this discussion