Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

INdemo

(6,994 posts) Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:11 AM Mar 2016

New York Times Urges Hillary Clinton to Release Her Wall Street Speech Transcripts

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Times Urges Hillary Clinton to Release Her Wall Street Speech Transcripts (Original Post) INdemo Mar 2016 OP

Good luck with that. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #1

Nailed it on the head! seekthetruth Mar 2016 #2

You are correct. Even those that are now part of the establishment INdemo Mar 2016 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Mar 2016 #4

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)

1. Good luck with that.

Reply to INdemo (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:13 AM

Mar 2016

She knows doing so would sink her campaign.

seekthetruth

(504 posts)

2. Nailed it on the head!

Reply to INdemo (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:41 AM

Mar 2016

Hillary, like all other candidates on either side, is a corporate fascist.

Except for Sanders!

INdemo

(6,994 posts)

3. You are correct. Even those that are now part of the establishment

Reply to seekthetruth (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:10 PM

Mar 2016

they we may have thought would always be their own man..a progressive.'

Al Franken for example is now in favor of "Fracking" since some of the sponsors of fracking are contributing to his campaign war chest. He also endorsed Hillary
Al Franken does not understand how our underground water supply works.He made the dumbest statement I've heard
He said "fracking is ok as long it is not close to our water table"

Response to seekthetruth (Reply #2)

INdemo This message was self-deleted by its author.

Reply to this discussion