HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion: 2016 (Forum) » Sanders opens up leads in...

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:07 PM

Sanders opens up leads in Alaska +14%; Maine +15%; Massachusetts +7%; Vermont +76% (WOW - 76%!)

Alaska = Sanders 48%; Clinton 34%

Maine = Sanders 56%; Clinton 41%

Massachusetts = Sanders 49%; Clinton 42%

Vermont = Sanders 86%; Clinton 10%

In addition, there are lots of within the margin-of-error ties and other great signs of progress in Arkansas (wow - Clinton's home state is in play!), Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, with more and more states to be added to the battleground list by the day!

This is exciting!

187 replies, 112526 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 187 replies Author Time Post
Reply Sanders opens up leads in Alaska +14%; Maine +15%; Massachusetts +7%; Vermont +76% (WOW - 76%!) (Original post)
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 OP
MohRokTah Feb 2016 #1
jeff47 Feb 2016 #4
MohRokTah Feb 2016 #10
gcomeau Feb 2016 #16
jeff47 Feb 2016 #25
daleanime Feb 2016 #56
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #57
roguevalley Feb 2016 #66
Divernan Feb 2016 #67
aquart Feb 2016 #145
randys1 Feb 2016 #103
jeff47 Feb 2016 #134
JGug1 Feb 2016 #163
kenfrequed Feb 2016 #18
Logical Feb 2016 #54
jeff47 Feb 2016 #58
Logical Feb 2016 #63
Mnpaul Feb 2016 #142
ebayfool Feb 2016 #20
reformist2 Feb 2016 #38
ebayfool Feb 2016 #52
Sheepshank Feb 2016 #99
ebayfool Feb 2016 #101
George II Feb 2016 #75
frylock Feb 2016 #78
ebayfool Feb 2016 #81
George II Feb 2016 #96
ebayfool Feb 2016 #98
George II Feb 2016 #108
ebayfool Feb 2016 #141
cali Feb 2016 #118
tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #92
Kittycat Feb 2016 #106
Helen Borg Feb 2016 #149
Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #28
wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #122
aquart Feb 2016 #146
KingFlorez Feb 2016 #33
daleanime Feb 2016 #60
reformist2 Feb 2016 #35
JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #43
Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #2
Name removed Feb 2016 #3
jeff47 Feb 2016 #6
kenfrequed Feb 2016 #24
Trajan Feb 2016 #112
Enthusiast Feb 2016 #117
Trajan Feb 2016 #121
Enthusiast Feb 2016 #139
Trajan Feb 2016 #144
Robbins Feb 2016 #29
LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #158
jillan Feb 2016 #12
Kalidurga Feb 2016 #15
Name removed Feb 2016 #22
Kalidurga Feb 2016 #26
cali Feb 2016 #17
geek tragedy Feb 2016 #42
cali Feb 2016 #47
geek tragedy Feb 2016 #49
roguevalley Feb 2016 #68
greymouse Feb 2016 #79
DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #159
jillan Feb 2016 #5
SheilaT Feb 2016 #7
CentralMass Feb 2016 #8
WillyT Feb 2016 #9
brooklynite Feb 2016 #11
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #14
roguevalley Feb 2016 #70
Kittycat Feb 2016 #110
Paulie Feb 2016 #130
Kittycat Feb 2016 #131
Paulie Feb 2016 #132
Kittycat Feb 2016 #133
beac Feb 2016 #156
Oilwellian Feb 2016 #123
neverforget Feb 2016 #136
morningfog Feb 2016 #30
KingFlorez Feb 2016 #31
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #55
mak3cats Feb 2016 #128
LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #160
Mike__M Feb 2016 #13
in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #44
dchill Feb 2016 #157
Tarc Feb 2016 #19
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #40
winter is coming Feb 2016 #53
Lucinda Feb 2016 #64
roguevalley Feb 2016 #72
Lucinda Feb 2016 #84
roguevalley Feb 2016 #91
Lucinda Feb 2016 #94
secondwind Feb 2016 #93
frylock Feb 2016 #83
SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #85
Lucinda Feb 2016 #87
Steven.kelly9850 Feb 2016 #125
Oilwellian Feb 2016 #126
urbuddha Feb 2016 #152
corkhead Feb 2016 #107
Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #21
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #23
Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2016 #181
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #182
Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2016 #185
morningfog Feb 2016 #27
thereismore Feb 2016 #32
Laughing Mirror Feb 2016 #34
PonyUp Feb 2016 #39
Laughing Mirror Feb 2016 #41
book_worm Feb 2016 #36
LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #114
magical thyme Feb 2016 #127
AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #37
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #46
Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #45
SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #48
blue neen Feb 2016 #138
Helen Borg Feb 2016 #50
angrychair Feb 2016 #51
TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #59
LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #115
TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #119
LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #120
merrily Feb 2016 #154
TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #170
SoapBox Feb 2016 #61
DCBob Feb 2016 #62
pkdu Feb 2016 #65
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #69
pkdu Feb 2016 #71
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #77
pkdu Feb 2016 #88
Nyan Feb 2016 #137
pkdu Feb 2016 #147
roguevalley Feb 2016 #74
George II Feb 2016 #73
Vote2016 Feb 2016 #89
mcar Feb 2016 #95
AzDar Feb 2016 #76
Merryland Feb 2016 #80
lumberjack_jeff Feb 2016 #82
blackspade Feb 2016 #86
lz103 Feb 2016 #90
PoliticalMalcontent Feb 2016 #100
lz103 Feb 2016 #104
iwannaknow Feb 2016 #97
trillion Feb 2016 #102
INdemo Feb 2016 #105
SCantiGOP Feb 2016 #109
retrowire Feb 2016 #111
Jack Rabbit Feb 2016 #113
Enthusiast Feb 2016 #116
jonestonesusa Feb 2016 #124
Bohunk68 Feb 2016 #155
Duval Feb 2016 #129
OhZone Feb 2016 #135
Ken Burch Feb 2016 #140
avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #143
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #148
Vote2016 Feb 2016 #166
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #169
BeanMusical Feb 2016 #150
Name removed Feb 2016 #151
Joe Chi Minh Feb 2016 #153
napnap Feb 2016 #161
Orsino Feb 2016 #162
John Poet Feb 2016 #164
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #174
lark Feb 2016 #165
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #186
kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #167
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #168
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #171
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #172
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #173
Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #178
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #179
amborin Feb 2016 #175
Faux pas Feb 2016 #176
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #177
kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #180
Vote2016 Feb 2016 #183
Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #184
SMC22307 Feb 2016 #187

Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:10 PM

4. If you'd like to run with that, then we'll also be talking about Clinton not getting 100% in NY. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #4)


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #10)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:17 PM

16. Why aren't his numbers higher than ****86%***????

 

Either that's snark or you need to see a psychologist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #10)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:19 PM

25. Is Clinton hated in NY?

Again, this is a comparison you do not want to emphasize. 86% is beloved in a political context. And your candidate looks very, very, lacking in her state by comparison.

But please, go ahead and keep going. That way we can start asking questions like "Why do NY voters not like Clinton?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #25)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:02 PM

56. We have our reasons.....

unfortunately quite a few of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #25)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:03 PM

57. On Wall Street, no, she's much loved; elsewhere in NY, she's not nearly as popular.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #57)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:29 PM

66. he's had double digits in Alaska for over a month given the last polling. :D

The largest pool of voters are independents so they aren't tied to a party for loyalty issues

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #57)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:31 PM

67. My lifelong Dem, upper West Side dtr. calls her the carpetbagger..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #57)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:58 AM

145. Really? Never been to New York?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #25)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:34 PM

103. If only you could celebrate Bernie without the attacks of Hillary...

so many of you need to see this


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511267191

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #103)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:28 PM

134. It's nice of you to show up after he deleted his attack post.

That way, you can maximize your superiority to us mere mortals that actually read his post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #4)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:18 PM

163. Bernie Sanders Emerging In Some States

I hate to rain on your parade but Nate Silver is not yet predicting Mass because it hasn't been polled enough but he sure sheds light on other states: Clinton's chances in.....
Nevada: 74%
SC..........: >99%
Georgia.......: 79%
OK..............:81%
Tenn...........: 99%
Texas..........9%
Virginia........8%
Michigan.......5%
NC...................: 98%


I suspect that in the end, Bernie Sanders' major contribution to what most of us here stand for is going to be to push Hillary Clinton to the left.
I have NO idea ow or why those smiley faces are on where 9's were written and I cannot get them off. They were not intended by me. My intention was to report facts, not demonstrate support of opposition to either candidate here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:18 PM

18. You do know how absurd that sounds... right?

I mean seriously... do you honestly imagine any candidate gets 100% in a contested primary at any time?

That sort of hyperbole just makes you look silly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kenfrequed (Reply #18)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:55 PM

54. The post was self deleted,mhow silly was it? Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #54)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:04 PM

58. He was claiming it was awful Sanders wasn't polling at 100%. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #58)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:16 PM

63. You can tell they are getting worried more every day! Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #58)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:42 AM

142. Bernie does poll at 100%

He won 100% of the counties in Vermont.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:18 PM

20. 86%? You sneer at 86%?

Obviously absolutely nuthin' is good enough.

Smh and

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ebayfool (Reply #20)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:29 PM

38. They don't make me angry anymore - they now only induce laughter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #38)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:51 PM

52. And then cowardly delete the posts so others can't see how bad they look!

So I want to just put it here that the posts mocked Sanders for not getting 100% (rather than the 86% he did get!). Twice. Double down, delete, then bow out. Probably running from a time-out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ebayfool (Reply #52)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:29 PM

99. Interesting

is self deleting this OP cowardly too? http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027367805

or do you have a different standard for Bernie supporters?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #99)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:32 PM

101. Dunno, I didn't see what was deleted. This one I did. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ebayfool (Reply #20)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:38 PM

75. So where does Senator Sanders live?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #75)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:45 PM

78. Vermont. Where does Secretary Clinton live?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #75)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:51 PM

81. Vermont. Is there a point you wish to make? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ebayfool (Reply #81)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:16 PM

96. Point? "Vermont +76% (WOW - 76%!)"

That's a surprise?

And before one of you ask where Clinton lives, she lives in New York, where the electorate in the Bronx is bigger than the entire state of Vermont.

Chances are he'll pull in a whopping 100,000 votes state-wide in Vermont.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #96)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:25 PM

98. Yes - Sanders 86%; Clinton 10% = 76% lead

The poster I responded to was the one expressing surprise.

And you sneer at an entire state. Again, no surprise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ebayfool (Reply #98)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:50 PM

108. No, look again. You responded to me.

I'm not sneering at any state, I'm just putting the poll results from Vermont into perspective.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #108)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:35 AM

141. I think we gots a 'chain of custody' reply problem!

Last edited Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:40 AM - Edit history (1)

The poster I responded to initially was the one expressing surprise. MohRokTah (Reply #1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511265952#post1
Who then deleted instead of responding

You asked a question
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511265952#post20

I answered
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511265952#post75

You responded
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511265952#post81

and on ...

So yes, I've looked again.
And yes, I responded to you. As you did to me.

And yes, what you call perspective - I call sneering. You were puckish about an entire state's value.

I'm sure YMMV.

And then I had to go to work, thread interruptus!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #96)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:34 PM

118. Chances are it will be well over twice that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #75)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:09 PM

92. He lives in Vermont were he has either been…

A mayor of the largest city in the state, a congressman or a senator for decades. So to get 86% support means that he must be doing a pretty damn good job for his constituents

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tex-wyo-dem (Reply #92)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:42 PM

106. Sounds like my kind of candidate!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #75)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:37 AM

149. Where did Bill Clinton live?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:21 PM

28. There are two big pieces of news in New York.

Hillary only leads Bernie by 21% and Bernie is stronger against Republicans in New York than Hillary.



Loudonville, NY. Hillary Clinton, who has a better favorability rating than Bernie Sanders among Democrats
but a weaker favorability rating among all voters, leads Sanders 55-34 percent in a head-to-head matchup with
New York Democrats.
On the Republican side, Donald Trump has the support of 34 percent of New York
GOPers, while Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz each have the support of 16 percent and Chris Christie is the only
other Republican in double digits with 11 percent support, according to a new Siena College poll of New York
State registered voters released today.

Clinton leads six leading Republicans by between
17 and 26 points, while Sanders runs up even bigger
leads of between 22 and 33 points.
Almost half of
New Yorkers – including nearly two-thirds of
Democrats – think Clinton will be the next President.
Jobs (42 percent) and keeping America safe
(30 percent) are the top issues.
“Hillary, with a small uptick in her favorability rating
since September, has a solid 21-point lead over
Bernie with Democrats, despite a significant increase
in his favorability rating,” said Siena College pollster
Steven Greenberg. “Sanders has a net 13-point better
favorability rating with all voters than Clinton, while she has a net nine-point better rating among Democrats,”



http://files.ctctcdn.com/9c83fb30501/9e02460e-4bda-4afc-adcd-9330137f842d.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #28)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:58 PM

122. I'm looking forward to Cuomo campaigning for her in NY.

He has his own establishment corruption trouble. He's really not that beloved in NY.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #28)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:03 AM

146. Uh. New York votes blue in the presidential.

The election that counts is the NYC primary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:25 PM

33. Clinton will be accused of fraud if Sanders doesn't make 100%

Wait for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KingFlorez (Reply #33)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:05 PM

60. Make sure you have plenty of food and water....

that should be quite a wait.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:27 PM

35. Thanks for the laughs!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:32 PM

43. Hilarious! Thanks for the laugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:09 PM

2. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, Attorney in Texas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)


Response to Name removed (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:11 PM

6. PPP's last NH poll: Clinton 47, Sanders 44.

You should probably not be counting on their polling quite so much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #6)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:19 PM

24. Bingo!

PPP also had her leading by 8 points in Iowa.

PPP seems absolutely terrible at doing primary race polls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kenfrequed (Reply #24)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:58 PM

112. PPP ...

Is a Clinton operation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trajan (Reply #112)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:29 PM

117. Just as I suspected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enthusiast (Reply #117)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:49 PM

121. I may need to pull that back ...

I know I've searched before and found the connection, but I'm not finding it now ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trajan (Reply #121)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:20 AM

139. It's fun to say it anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enthusiast (Reply #139)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:55 AM

144. Hah ... Not as fun as nailing them for the real bought and paid for polling

I'll find it another time ....have an awesome night

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #6)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:21 PM

29. this alone should disequalife PPP

they had clinton up by 3 and bernie won by 22.they are joke.plus they are being paid by david brock's correct the record.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jeff47 (Reply #6)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:02 AM

158. Maybe their MOE was 25 points

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:13 PM

12. Superdelegates do not count until the convention - sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:16 PM

15. You can keep going with that if you like.

It's not an argument most people are going to buy though after he wins in Nevada and comes close to a tie in South Carolina. Hillary must win that state by at least 20%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kalidurga (Reply #15)


Response to Name removed (Reply #22)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:20 PM

26. Pft we will know after Saturday's poll what percent of a chance Bernie has to win.

And Hillary can't just comfortably win in Nevada she has to win by a very very large margin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:17 PM

17. Hill is UNELECTABLE. She is viewed as the most dishonest candidate in either party

She is the best GOTV tool for repukes imaginable. And sorry, but hilly's superdelegates are unplugged. Young people and independents won't vote for her. Americans are sick of the Clintons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #17)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:32 PM

42. Sorry, but it's complete horseshit that she's more dishonest than Donald effing Trump. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #42)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:36 PM

47. Not according to polls

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #47)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:37 PM

49. oops, misread your post, didn't see the "is seen as "--apologies nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #49)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:32 PM

68. she's 'more honest than f*ing Trump' ... you do know how bad that sounds, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #42)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:47 PM

79. I agree with geek tragedy.

I have nothing good to say about Hillary, but in a dishonesty contest, I am not sure whether she or Trump would come in first.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #42)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:02 AM

159. Since...

...dishonesty is an either or type of thing... I don't think comparing levels will help her much...

Yes... She is dishonest!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:11 PM

5. He's up in Arizona too. They reported it on the local news but I have not found the link - yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:11 PM

7. I'm not sure it makes any sense to still consider

Arkansas a "home state" for Hillary. She didn't grow up there, although she did live there for a number of years and was first lady of the state. But she moved away nearly a quarter century ago, and I'd guess that a lot of voters, especially younger ones, don't feel much of a connection to her and are going to vote the way they would if she'd never lived there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:11 PM

8. Wow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:12 PM

9. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:13 PM

11. "But Clinton leads in 10 of the 12 states that vote on March 1....."

Must have missed that part.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:15 PM

14. Clinton is dropping while Sanders is rising in those states, and Sanders has time to flip many more!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #14)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:34 PM

70. I think that the reason she leads until voting is because of the vast ocean of people who don't have

a landline and live on their cell phones. No one can discount bernie winning it all because those voters aren't polled and they skew to him. Hillary's idea of an outreach to younger voters is to go to AOL.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #70)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:54 PM

110. You've got mail!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kittycat (Reply #110)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:06 PM

130. I just showed my 9yo that

She's like "What? What is that!?!?" I had to explain that's how we connected to the Internet, and we had no video or iPads either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paulie (Reply #130)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:15 PM

131. Lol. I did the same!

Mine turns 9 this weekend. He asked what the weird sound was. I said basically the same. He thought it was funny. I wonder what he would have thought about Apple II's?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kittycat (Reply #131)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:20 PM

132. I powered up my TI-99/4a circa 1983 a couple months ago

Plugged in the Star Trek cartridge and speech synth and she was like "this is so boring!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paulie (Reply #132)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:23 PM

133. +1

Lol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paulie (Reply #132)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:46 AM

156. You might enjoy this:



and this:




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #70)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:05 PM

123. Oh gawd, my 90 yr old parents still have AOL

Never could convince them to use the free browsers available today.

It seems the more people learn about Bernie, the higher his poll numbers go. The momentum is definitely in his favor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Oilwellian (Reply #123)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:39 PM

136. I convinced my 82 year old mother a few years ago to dump AOL.

It took awhile but I did it.

Oh yeah, she's a Bernie supporter!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:21 PM

30. She will not win 10 of the 12.

Of course, you folks were telling us Bernie would not even make it to have his home state vote. THen we were told, he'd win only one state.

Now he is leading in many and national polls within 2.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:23 PM

31. More like ignored

Any poll that shows Sanders trailing is dismissed as being faked or rigged.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:01 PM

55. PPP (a robo-call pollster that has about a 10% pro-Clinton in-house effect) polled only 12 of 14

Super Tuesday states.

PPP skipped Colorado and Minnesota, and the Morning Consult state-by-state survey polling shows Sanders being ahead in both Colorado and Minnesota.

Also, Oklahoma is within the margin of error with Sanders rising and Clinton plummeting.

Polls are never a substitute for votes, but if you were going to make a guess about Super Tuesday based on the polling and the poll trends, the data looks good for Sanders in Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Vermont. Four days later, things look good for Sanders in Kansas (and Nebraska looks like a toss up trending toward Sanders). One day after that (March 6), Sanders looks good in Maine. Two days later, Michigan looks close and trending toward Sanders.

In the next four weeks, you should be prepared for Sanders building on his huge win in New Hampshire with a good chance at wins in Nevada, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Vermont, Kansas, Nebraska, Maine, Michigan, and maybe a few surprises in addition.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:31 PM

128. I can't say for certain, but I thought I read somewhere...

...that some of those 12 states hadn't been polled since last fall sometime. So not a true and current picture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #11)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:08 AM

160. I have been assured by wiser minds that Bernie doesn't have the money to compete

with Hillary. So no worries, this is in the bag for Hill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:15 PM

13. So, I have a question . .

is a firewall portable?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mike__M (Reply #13)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:32 PM

44. Heh...since hers is nonexistent, nope!



She's going to have a rude awakening on Super Tuesday. It's going to be painful.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mike__M (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:52 AM

157. Yes, at least as portable as the goal posts HRC is using.

Her path to the coronation is riddled with post-holes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:18 PM

19. ERHMAGHERD SEVENTY-SIX PERCENT?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Cool stats for one's home turf.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #19)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:30 PM

40. Sanders is winning his home 87% to 10%; Hillary was ahead just 47% to 42% in December in her home!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #40)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:54 PM

53. Well, obviously he's well-known in Vermont, so I'd say that huge swing must

represent a collapse of the "unelectable" meme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #19)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:23 PM

64. FWIW - she has more of the VT superdelegates than he does. 4 to 2 with 3 uncommitted. :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #64)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:36 PM

72. if she tries the super delegate route to circumvent the will of the people she will be very

very sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #72)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:52 PM

84. Our primaries use a delegate system to determine our nominee. The one with the most wins.

It's just that simple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #84)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:05 PM

91. super delegates were designed to end insurgent candidates. I have loathed the system since forever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #91)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:12 PM

94. I pretty much agree. I think we could easily go one person one vote. I'm not sure that the reasons

for all these crazy weighted systems in both the primary and GE are really relevant anymore. I understand the point of trying to balance rural and city issues so some people aren't underserved etc, but there really should be a simpler way to conduct an election.

Until someone gets changes made, we are pretty much stuck with what we have.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #72)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:11 PM

93. I agree.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #64)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:52 PM

83. How many did she have in 2008?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #64)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:52 PM

85. Buying lobbyists super delegates for the nomination, yeah sounds like a Hillary move.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SammyWinstonJack (Reply #85)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:56 PM

87. She isn't buying anyone. That whole attempt at a smear is beyond silly.

The Democratic party is in the process of selecting our nominee. One of them has been raising money for the down ticket races, as they both pledged to do. And as far as people squeeling about her supporting the candidacy of some of those supporting her, thats sort of the point of it all. The whole point is to get Dems elected. Are you new to the party?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #87)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:07 PM

125. Un-democratic

No I am not new but the Democratic party is anything but democratic! ! So she is buying votes, it is perfectly okay with the party, the system is designed to stop people like Bernie Sanders, the head of the party said so. They want more people in the party, they even want them at the convention, but they don't want the establishment candidates to have opposition. This is why the Democratic party has gotten by with being Republican lite.

The question is who is in charge of the party, the Democratic voters or the party leaders. So you are right Hillary Clinton is not doing anything wrong, it's just not democratic! !!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucinda (Reply #87)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:12 PM

126. I've been in the party long enough to know...

Super Delegates have never usurped the majority vote. If they try it this time, there will be a Republican in the White House.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Oilwellian (Reply #126)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:08 AM

152. No truer words were ever spoken.

It's Bernie or Bust !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #19)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:48 PM

107. You're right, it shows that the more people know Bernie, the more they like him.

How's Hillary doing in her home state(s). Which state does she count as "home" anyway?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:18 PM

21. If the Vermont numbers play out, Clinton leaves with NO delegates from that state. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:19 PM

23. Senators from Maine and Mass. have not yet endorsed either

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #23)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:15 PM

181. The Maine senators are Independent and Republican.

They aren't likely to make endorsements for Democratic candidates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zing Zing Zingbah (Reply #181)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:16 PM

182. Senator King votes and caucuses with the Dems

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #182)

Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:43 AM

185. Yes, that is true

but he probably won't say anything about the dem primaries since he is not actually apart of the party. I wouldn't expect it. He might endorse the dem candidate for president once the selection has been made.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:20 PM

27. Great news. Go for the delegate shut out in Vermont! Hope he holds that 86% +.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:24 PM

32. AK, ME care about hunting. I think Bernie's reasonable stance on hunting rifles is helping him there


And it will help him in other rural states.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:25 PM

34. Clinton 10%

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laughing Mirror (Reply #34)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:29 PM

39. Why did you do that?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PonyUp (Reply #39)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:31 PM

41. Why not?

That's what it says in OP. Do you imagine Clinton greeting that news with glee?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:29 PM

36. Where are you getting some of those polls from as being close?

For instance Arkansas, which you are excited about, the most recent poll has Hillary up by 25. That poll was released yesterday.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to book_worm (Reply #36)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:12 PM

114. I can't see Hillary not winning by 75% in Arkansas especially with the women. The women I knew in

2008 were so pissed that a black man won that they would not vote in the general at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to book_worm (Reply #36)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:29 PM

127. where does the OP mention Arkansas? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #37)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:36 PM

46. Wisconsin is well within the margin of error with Clinton dropping like a rock as Sanders is soaring

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:35 PM

45. I've been saying for a while now

that I think Bernie would have a much better chance in Alaska against ANY Republican than Hillary would. "Democrat" is kind of a dirty word up here, but we don't have much of a problem with socialism. See, e.g., the Alaska Permanent Fund. Also Alaska's current governor is an Independent who handily defeated his Republican incumbent opponent last year, so there's that. My Alaska FB friends overwhelmingly support Bernie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:36 PM

48. State Education Ranking Shows Vermont #1, South Carolina Last

Does better education make better voters???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoLeftIAmRight (Reply #48)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:24 PM

138. Just because you keep saying that over and over again doesn't make it true.

"no surprise here - people who can think (Vermont) vote Sanders"

"South Carolina - not so much..."

"and - red state - who cares - it does not matter"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1230048

The undertones of what you continue to imply are not flattering.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:43 PM

50. In short: Hillary is toast!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:04 PM

59. Hillary seems to do the best in the old Confederate states.

You know, the low-info states where slavery is omitted from the textbooks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #59)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:16 PM

115. I think they are probably looking at results on how she did in 2008 against a black man.

I really feel this election is about the kids. If they turn out BIG then all bets are off and it is a new game. This is as it should be out is their future that the election is about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalArkie (Reply #115)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:39 PM

119. I agree; the youth vote is crucial. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #119)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:42 PM

120. I think the kids know that this is their shot at fixing some stuff. It is just so right that

this one really depends on them. It will really tell the old farts like me whether just to shut up and accept life as it is or start jumping for joy as what it might become.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #59)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:17 AM

154. Jury results, I was one of those who didn't comment.

This is regional bias. Democrats living in the south shouldn't be facing Trump like smears like "low information" on DU.


Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The post is uninformed and indeed a broad-brush smear. However it doesn't warrant a hide, imo. Frankly the poster is the "low-info" voter and should simply be ignored.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please toughen up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to merrily (Reply #154)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:39 PM

170. I'm from the south, so I can speak from first hand experience.

With all the poverty (thanks to republicans and blue dogs) people don't have access to the information they need. This is the only reason Hillary has a southern 'firewall', and it infuriates me!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:05 PM

61. K & R!

Go Go Bernie!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:07 PM

62. Too bad for Senator Sanders most of America looks nothing like any of those states.

Thank goodness!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:23 PM

65. Forget something there..?

From the Vermont link....But Clinton leads in 10 of the 12 states that vote on March 1.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #65)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:33 PM

69. Sanders looks strong in 5 of 14 Super Tuesday states. He looks strong in 4 of 6 states a week later,

and Sanders looks strong in 8 out of 8 states in the stretch from March 22 to April 9!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #69)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:36 PM

71. "Looks Strong"...what does that actually mean? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #71)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:38 PM

77. Winning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to pkdu (Reply #71)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:57 PM

137. The same way he "looked strong" before IW, NH,

and currently "looks strong" in NV, meaning that Hillary has been losing and Bernie has been gaining support.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nyan (Reply #137)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:31 AM

147. See post #88

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #65)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:37 PM

74. on land line polls

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:37 PM

73. Impressive, anything south of Springfield MA?

Other than Alaska (who elected Sarah Palin Governor ) all of those states, and you can throw in New Hampshire too, are no further than 50 miles from Vermont.

I suggest you look at this link to see what the chances are of Sanders winning in all of those other states:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/nevada-democratic/

PS - the "battleground" states are what they are, we don't add them to the list by the day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #73)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:57 PM

89. The list of battleground states DOES grow because Hillary is free falling as Sanders' support grows

daily so states that were not competitive a month ago are tossups or "lean Sanders" now, and states that "lean Hillary" now will tip toward "lean Sanders" in the coming months.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #73)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:16 PM

95. ..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:38 PM

76. Go, Bernie GO!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:49 PM

80. I'm not real religious but

HALLELUJAH!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:51 PM

82. Hillary is counting on winning the primary by winning states who have no intention...

...of voting D in the general.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:55 PM

86. Holy smokes!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:58 PM

90. where are you getting your data from?

Please site the sources for your data. Links if possible. Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lz103 (Reply #90)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:30 PM

100. The source links are embedded in the post. Click the state names for sources.

Welcome to DU, lz103.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PoliticalMalcontent (Reply #100)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:37 PM

104. Thank you!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:17 PM

97. Sanders far outpaces Clinton in gen. election (RealClearPolitics)

So much for Clinton's electability argument:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:33 PM

102. Awesome!

 

People are finally waking up to Hillary's super pacs are doing it to continue the corporate stronghold on our laws, and no race is better off with her because of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:40 PM

105. Sanders will win Indiana (prediction)

Hillary lost IN in 2008 and 2016 Bernie Sanders will have a strong group of volunteers and staff...

For Democrats there are 92 Delegates (I think winner takes all)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:53 PM

109. WOW !!

WOW !!

Lotta WOWs in posts these days.

Lotta bold letters and ALL CAPS too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:56 PM

111. We knew that Vermont was a given, but... I still like to see that difference. :) nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:03 PM

113. Forward! Charge those giants!




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 07:28 PM

116. Kicked and recommended! Go, Bernie!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:06 PM

124. Since New York is Clinton's "home state"

she should match Bernie's Vermont support, wouldn't you think?

Or not???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jonestonesusa (Reply #124)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:41 AM

155. She is roundly detested in Upstate, which is heavy Republican registration.

She is not popular with Upstate Dems, either. We hunt to put venison in our freezers. Bernie understands that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:52 PM

129. It is exciting and will get even better for Bernie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:36 PM

135. I may have been wrong, he might win 5 or 6 states not just 2. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:31 AM

140. Alaska doesn't count...we have NO diversity







Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:48 AM

143. This is getting more and more exciting.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 04:46 AM

148. This post has 58206 views

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #148)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:35 PM

166. Wow. 17,000 facebook likes and 75,000 views. How does that even happen?

Kicked and rec'd

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Vote2016 (Reply #166)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:10 PM

169. Is this like the most successful DU thread of all time or what?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:56 AM

150. Kick and R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:59 AM

153. Vermont 86% ? Something wrong - I mean 'right' - with the machines. Not

malfunctioning at all.... Something's badly amiss.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:08 AM

162. Good job, America.

You're listening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:24 PM

164. AND Colorado!

http://freebeacon.com/politics/free-beacon-poll-sanders-overtakes-clinton-in-colorado/

I think we'll be seeing more like this as time goes on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to John Poet (Reply #164)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:30 PM

174. Some people dispute this poll, but Predictwise and the state-by-state Morning Consult cross-tabs

also point to an excellent trend in Colorado.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:33 PM

165. Those are small states, but still good news.

Wonder how he's doing in the biggies, CA, FL, TX, PA, NY, NJ? I haven't seen any poll results for any of these lately, so truly don't know. I'd expect that he's rising everywhere, but don't have any stats to support this feeling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lark (Reply #165)

Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:28 PM

186. The big states generally have proportional delegate allocation so a win in a big state is not a big

win unless it results in a lopsided delegate allocation.

I suspect that Clinton will do well in ex-Confederate red states and states that share a border with Arkansas. By April 9, Sanders will have erased that early March advantage Clinton will get from the ex-Confederate red states.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:35 PM

167. my hope is up too....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:09 PM

168. This thread has over 76,000 views

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #168)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:07 PM

171. Cool!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #171)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:09 PM

172. What happens if it gets 100,000? Will it roll back to 0 like an old odometer?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #172)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:33 PM

173. Good question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #173)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 04:39 PM

178. It went over 100,000. Nothing broke! DU still running.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #178)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:54 PM

179. Good to know (I was getting curious how it would report)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:54 AM

175. kicking

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:41 PM

176. Kicketty Kickin'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sat Feb 20, 2016, 03:15 PM

177. Add Nevada (+2%) and Colorado to the list of states where Sanders has opened up a lead!

Nevada - 49% to 47%

Colorado - 49% to 43%

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:56 PM

180. good news! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:01 PM

183. 27,000 likes and 105,000 views. That's inconceivable (and, yes, I do know what that word means)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Vote2016 (Reply #183)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:25 PM

184. lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:53 AM

187. Damn, how'd I miss this thread? K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread