Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MisterGamut

(312 posts)
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 02:00 AM Oct 2012

An observation and a question RE voter ID laws.

Okay, so we all know about how some states with GOP governors have tried to institute voter ID laws to disenfranchise democratic voters, but I just realized something about it that I hadn't thought before.

So let's suppose a fraud voter were to enter a voting station and vote for a democratic ticket. If he was allowed to vote, the net effect of his fraud would be to cancel out one Republican party line vote.

Meanwhile, by not allowing a legitimate voter to vote a democratic ticket because of not having a photo ID, that same GOP ticket vote is not canceled, and a legitimate dem voter was disenfranchised.

So not only does the law not prevent an actual problem since voter fraud of the type described rarely ever happens, but implementation of the law actually benefits Republicans twice every time it is unnecessarily applied to an otherwise legal voter.

My question is, do you think framing the issue this way will be more convincing to an "independent judiciary" that a problem exists?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An observation and a question RE voter ID laws. (Original Post) MisterGamut Oct 2012 OP
All 4 cases of fraudulent votes they found here were Republicans Warpy Oct 2012 #1
Where was that? rfranklin Oct 2012 #2
While our SC is 3-3 right now, they have a reputation for being independent-minded. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #3

Warpy

(111,251 posts)
1. All 4 cases of fraudulent votes they found here were Republicans
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 02:11 AM
Oct 2012

and 3 of them were Texans with vacation property who voted there and then came here and voted again.

Republicans are the cheaters here as far as fraud goes, it seems, both voter fraud and election fraud. The latter is a much greater concern.

This is just disenfranchisement, pure and simple, exactly the way the Poll Tax was.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
3. While our SC is 3-3 right now, they have a reputation for being independent-minded.
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 02:16 PM
Oct 2012

When they sent the case back to Simpson, they did so with some rather stringent requirements and ultimately he had to reverse his own earlier decision and issue an injunction. I agree with your analysis, but apparently so did the PASC. It won't go back to the PASC until after the election, but it is certain that it will. We'll have to see how they handle it then and if they don't eliminate the law the voter ID will be in place in 2013. I have a high degree of confidence that they'll nuke it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»An observation and a ques...