2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Official Hillary Clinton releasing transcripts COUNTDOWN CLOCK!
http://iwilllookintoit.com/WE CAN DREAM, CAN'T WE?
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Voters yawn!
thereismore
(13,326 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... that HRC release the transcripts - other than BS supporters hoping they contain something they can use against her?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)But the average voter is.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Did all of the BS voters in NH say they were voting for him because Hillary won't release her speech transcripts?
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)the transcripts are the least of her problems. She has a 43% trustworthy ratings of SC voters 29 and under, Bernie is at 100%. Why don't you talk about that?
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)will. Very telling IMO
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Never mind responding - it's obvious why.
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)What's the difference between THAT and changing the subject?
The subject surrounds the issues you've managed to steer away from ...
The enormous speaking fees DIRECTLY link to a corrupt campaign finance system that has only worsened. By the total count, $21M in speaking fees correlate with how much Wall Street becomes a special interests for HRC, and she isn't sharing what could be an obvious proof that there is NO correlation.
Can you find any countdown clock that has asked Bernie Sanders for transcripts of his speeches? No... HRC, in response to asking for hers, asked that EVERYONE share there transcripts before she thinks about it some more.
What's to hide? Would seeing them correlate HRC's Wall Street special interest?
I think enough people have responded to the issue of Wall Street and K Street owning candidates to support a WIDE interest in HRC's showing what her support of Wall Street's business as usual was. We already heard from a participant who said HRC's speech was GLOWING about Wall Street.
But, you keep changing the subject by asking more questions of whoever questions you. So, your real answer is, "Nobody wants to know". Who is this "nobody"? And, how do you know?
Given that the same issues meets with a HUGE response from the HUGE crowds at Sander's, I'd say thousands and thousands of persons in one venue alone with not agree with you. In fact, they'd boo you right off the stage, the same way they did after HRC's low blows were met with booing.
Can you HANDLE the question without asking another question.?
earthshine
(1,642 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Hillary cannot have it both ways and be allowed to ... get away with it!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I question your answer(s)
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)oasis
(49,317 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)You're right though, I'm yawning after reading your post.
.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)Can you tell us that, NanceGreggs?
She didn't say something that she should not have said, did she? Something that might cost us the Presidency should it come out?
Is she ASHAMED of something she told Goldman Sachs?
Interesting the integrity level that Hillary supporters feel is acceptable in a presidential candidate, isn't it?
polly7
(20,582 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)back machine?
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)That's not allowed.
earthshine
(1,642 posts)I'm sure he would release them, if anyone bothered to ask.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Those who support true smear campaigns would poop in their drawers if Bernie released his transcripts. I've actually transcribed a few pages of the speeches on socialism of my own. What do you get in response to these transcribed transcripts? Crickets... That's what you get...
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Fiction?
Seriously?
And the Hillary camp claimed to want a clean primary. Let's see if Bernie can measure up to 50 Shades of Grey...
cui bono
(19,926 posts).
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Califonz
(465 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Weathervanian?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Here's more popcorn -
I'm sure ANY DAY now, as soon as Chelsea gets through her latest warm up act behind the podium, she'll come up with some truth!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Vinca
(50,236 posts)Reporting from attendees must be true. Apparently, she was sympathetic toward them and assured them they weren't to blame for the financial meltdown and that we were all in this together. The poor, victimized millionaires and billionaires.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)only helping the Republicans. Hillary is the only Democrat in the race. Where is your loyalty?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)You take a person who's served in congress as long as Bernie Sanders has, erase how his voter registration was labeled, listen to what he's been saying consistently over 30 - 40 years, and tell me if you don't have THE ONLY CANDIDATE WITH DEMOCRATIC VALUES.
Are you listening to what Hillary Clinton has been saying all these years, or are you paying attention to how candidates have been running for president who are INDISTINGUISHABLE from the corporatists on the "other isle"?
Have you seen the number of legislative items ALL THESE YEARS for which Bernie Sanders has championed with his fellow caucusing DEMOCRATS?
Have you been listening to Mrs. Clinton, who has changed her mind on gay rights, trans-pacific partnerships and who favored and campaigned for NAFTA and the TPP, only to flip around like a weathervane after it's obvious that the people agree and respect Senator Sanders?
WHERE'S YOUR LOYALTY to the democratic principals of our party? Can you be that hard of hearing or visually impaired to what these candidates say every day? Of course, we want to hear what she says to her biggest contributor to her running!
OF COURSE, she ought to own up to what she says in writing!! She keeps changing her version of she says EVERY DAY!!!!!
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)And YOU know this very well... or are you needing to be reminded?
Do you want to be fed truth with a bib and big spoon, or will you just admit that Sanders has stood by our LGBT community for well over 30 years? You should have seen this stuff already on DU.
Or, are you just going to carry someone's version of their myopic vision?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)(((((((((((((((((((((( crickets ))))))))))))))))))))))
Meanwhile, be a loyal lap dawg, rather than remember you're a real Democrat.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)was against gay marriage 2006-2007. That is a fact and you know it. It is easy for him to be anti-everything Clinton than it is for him to create meaningful proposals that actually makes sense.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)By all measures, Sanders was ahead of his time in supporting gay rights. In 1983, as mayor of Burlington, he signed a Gay Pride Day proclamation calling it a civil rights issue.
He was one of just 67 members in the House of Representatives to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act (Clinton policy) That was a politically tough decision he prides himself on and points to as a key progressive bona fide.
Oh, and... Sanders opposed Dont Ask Dont Tell in 1993, another Clinton-era policy, and supported civil unions in Vermont in 2000.
Regarding DOMA and DADT... Let's see... who was supporting that one, hmmmm?
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Sanders does not have the leaderships skills nor does he has the backing of any prominent Democrat that agrees with him.
Crickets my ass..
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I'd say Senator Bernie Sanders' leadership is apparent. The fact that you drum, "he does not have them" without any information beyond this endless loop is proof that the crickets are coming out of somebody's rear trunk!
((((( Chirp! )))))
And, as always, THANKS for kicking my post!
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)And why loyalty?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)I will help her look for them
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)It starts off that I'm in my house, but it did not look like my house at all, but I knew it was. And there was a bunch of people I knew in my dream, but I don't know them in real life. So there was this lady with blonde hair that was sitting in a chair, and my dog started sniffing her dog. So I said, can I take your dog to the dog park with my dog to have a race? And she said, sure!
And I was like, Where's the leash? and she told me it was in the 13th floor of Goldman Sachs building. Then I got the dog, and everyone raced to Goldman Sachs. Just when we though we'd get into Goldman Sachs, out jumps this gnarly big mean-looking dude who told us to forget about that little task and if we were crazy enough to think we could get our grubby little hands on what CLEARLY is owned by Goldman Sachs, well, then, we had just better wake up from this fucking dream now.
VIGILANCE!!!
Punkingal
(9,522 posts):kick:
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)ARE THEY HERE YET?
ARE THEY HERE YET?
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I thought for SURE those transcripts would be made available by now...