The Official Hillary Clinton releasing transcripts COUNTDOWN CLOCK!
http://iwilllookintoit.com/
WE CAN DREAM, CAN'T WE?
= new reply since forum marked as read
What's the difference between THAT and changing the subject?
The subject surrounds the issues you've managed to steer away from ...
The enormous speaking fees DIRECTLY link to a corrupt campaign finance system that has only worsened. By the total count, $21M in speaking fees correlate with how much Wall Street becomes a special interests for HRC, and she isn't sharing what could be an obvious proof that there is NO correlation.
Can you find any countdown clock that has asked Bernie Sanders for transcripts of his speeches? No... HRC, in response to asking for hers, asked that EVERYONE share there transcripts before she thinks about it some more. 
What's to hide? Would seeing them correlate HRC's Wall Street special interest?
I think enough people have responded to the issue of Wall Street and K Street owning candidates to support a WIDE interest in HRC's showing what her support of Wall Street's business as usual was. We already heard from a participant who said HRC's speech was GLOWING about Wall Street.
But, you keep changing the subject by asking more questions of whoever questions you. So, your real answer is, "Nobody wants to know". Who is this "nobody"? And, how do you know?
Given that the same issues meets with a HUGE response from the HUGE crowds at Sander's, I'd say thousands and thousands of persons in one venue alone with not agree with you. In fact, they'd boo you right off the stage, the same way they did after HRC's low blows were met with booing.
Can you HANDLE the question without asking another question.?
Those who support true smear campaigns would poop in their drawers if Bernie released his transcripts. I've actually transcribed a few pages of the speeches on socialism of my own. What do you get in response to these transcribed transcripts? Crickets... That's what you get...
Fiction?
Seriously?
And the Hillary camp claimed to want a clean primary. Let's see if Bernie can measure up to 50 Shades of Grey...
.
Here's more popcorn -
I'm sure ANY DAY now, as soon as Chelsea gets through her latest warm up act behind the podium, she'll come up with some truth!
Reporting from attendees must be true. Apparently, she was sympathetic toward them and assured them they weren't to blame for the financial meltdown and that we were all in this together. The poor, victimized millionaires and billionaires.
By all measures, Sanders was ahead of his time in supporting gay rights. In 1983, as mayor of Burlington, he signed a Gay Pride Day proclamation calling it a civil rights issue.
He was one of just 67 members in the House of Representatives to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act (Clinton policy) That was a politically tough decision he prides himself on and points to as a key progressive bona fide.
Oh, and... Sanders opposed Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in 1993, another Clinton-era policy, and supported civil unions in Vermont in 2000.
Regarding DOMA and DADT... Let's see... who was supporting that one, hmmmm? 
I'd say Senator Bernie Sanders' leadership is apparent. The fact that you drum, "he does not have them" without any information beyond this endless loop is proof that the crickets are coming out of somebody's rear trunk!
((((( Chirp! ))))) 
And, as always, THANKS for kicking my post! 
It starts off that I'm in my house, but it did not look like my house at all, but I knew it was. And there was a bunch of people I knew in my dream, but I don't know them in real life. So there was this lady with blonde hair that was sitting in a chair, and my dog started sniffing her dog. So I said, “can I take your dog to the dog park with my dog to have a race?” And she said, “sure!”
And I was like, “Where's the leash?” and she told me it was in the 13th floor of Goldman Sachs building. Then I got the dog, and everyone raced to Goldman Sachs. Just when we though we'd get into Goldman Sachs, out jumps this gnarly big mean-looking dude who told us to forget about that little task and if we were crazy enough to think we could get our grubby little hands on what CLEARLY is owned by Goldman Sachs, well, then, we had just better wake up from this fucking dream now.
VIGILANCE!!! 
ARE THEY HERE YET?
ARE THEY HERE YET?
