Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:37 AM Oct 2012

NYT: Romney Claims of Bipartisanship as Governor Face Challenge

BOSTON — He came into office with a mandate to shake things up, an agenda laden with civics-book reforms and a raging fiscal crisis that threatened to torpedo both. He sparred with a hostile legislature and suffered a humiliating setback in the midterm elections. As four years drew to a close, his legacy was blotted by anemic job growth, sagging political popularity and — except for a landmark health care overhaul bill — a record of accomplishment that disappointed many.

That could be the Barack Obama that Mitt Romney depicted in Wednesday’s presidential debate as an ineffective and overly partisan leader. But it could also be Mitt Romney, who boasted of a stellar record as Massachusetts governor, running a state dominated by the political opposition.

Mr. Romney did score some successes beyond his health care legislation, notably joining a Democratic legislature to cut a deficit-ridden budget by $1.6 billion and revamping a troubled school building fund. Some outside experts and former aides say his administration excelled at the sorts of nuts-and-bolts efficiencies that make bureaucracies run better, like streamlining permit approvals and modernizing jobs programs.

As a Republican governor whose legislature was 87 percent Democratic, Mr. Romney said in Wednesday’s debate, “I figured out from Day 1 I had to get along, and I had to work across the aisle to get anything done.” The result, he said, was that “we drove our schools to be No. 1 in the nation. We cut taxes 19 times.”

Continue reading:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/06/us/politics/romney-claims-of-bipartisanship-as-governor-face-challenge.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121006

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Romney Claims of Bipartisanship as Governor Face Challenge (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2012 OP
The schools were already good before he was elected Justice Oct 2012 #1
There are dozens of things to attack Romney on for his MA record TroyD Oct 2012 #2
It's easy to deal with a "loyal opposition" that isn't determined to see you fail Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #3
Small point-- politicians are normally addressed with the highest... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #4
Here's the difference: TroyD Oct 2012 #5

Justice

(7,185 posts)
1. The schools were already good before he was elected
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:56 AM
Oct 2012

the health care plan was really the work of the speaker of the house - Sal DiMasi (now in jail for corruption, and sadly suffering from mouth/tongue cancer).

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
2. There are dozens of things to attack Romney on for his MA record
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:00 AM
Oct 2012

I posted a list yesterday in another thread.

Everything from the fact that the Democratic legislature had to override hundreds of his vetoes, to his destroying his computer records before he left office, to being out of state on 200 different days instead of governing the state.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,407 posts)
3. It's easy to deal with a "loyal opposition" that isn't determined to see you fail
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:57 AM
Oct 2012

Nearly every POTUS until President Clinton enjoyed some degree of bipartisanship from the other side- or at least there was a recognition that, regardless of who is POTUS, life must go on and there were things that needed to get done. Even despite the "outcome" of the 2000 election, Democrats didn't vow to crush George W. Bush and worked together with him to keep the country going, especially after 9/11. The Republicans vowed to crush President Obama from day 0, making it necessary for President Obama to HAVE TO get things IN SPITE OF THEM. I imagine that Romney had it pretty easy by contrast in Massachusetts during his single term as Governor (and BTW I hate that some commentators still refer to him as "Governor Romney" even though he hasn't been governor for, what, 6 years? They do the same thing with Gingrich too).

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
4. Small point-- politicians are normally addressed with the highest...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 10:38 AM
Oct 2012

office they have achieved. President Carter, Governor Whitman, Senator Kerry, Speaker Pelosi...

Annoying as it may be, more annoying might be for the press to diss former Senators, Governors, Presidents and Speakers we actually kinda like.









TroyD

(4,551 posts)
5. Here's the difference:
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 10:40 AM
Oct 2012

As far as I know, Romney has been out of office longer than any other Presidential nominee of either party since Reagan in 1980.

Usually when people run for President, they are incumbent Governors, Senators, Vice-Presidents etc.

In Mitt's case, he has been out of office for YEARS.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT: Romney Claims of Bip...