Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:50 AM Oct 2012

R.I.P. Republican Talking Point

"The Obama economic agenda sucks because employment has been over 8% for his entire term." Another dishonest talking point - one that avoids considering the trends in employment and consumer confidence - in their desperate attempt to whitewash the results of their Party's control of all 3 branches of our government from 2000-2006. By 2008, the results of their governorship and legislated economic policies almost killed this country. Their ideological "clean paper" nation-building experiment in Iraq - the CPA - was a bright and shining disaster - totally for the people of Iraq and economically for the people here ($1TT and counting). Had Gore been President, I suspect that Trillion plus money would have been spent creating a new energy economy, based on decentralizing energy generation, using alternative, renewable energy strategies...one that would require lots of jobs to manufacture, install, service these systems. They killed the idea in the 80's when they 'changed course' on Carter's energy policies in the late 70's. Dejavue all over again.

Wonder when the morons in the USA, who vote against their best interests, will figure this out?

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
R.I.P. Republican Talking Point (Original Post) Old and In the Way Oct 2012 OP
Bunch of Unhappy Faces This Morning: On the Road Oct 2012 #1
The new talking point is the numbers are "cooked" Kelvin Mace Oct 2012 #2
The numbers are "cooked" Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #6
This is important to the narrative they will use if Obama wins Kelvin Mace Oct 2012 #10
Right Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #12
Any RATIONAL people Kelvin Mace Oct 2012 #13
Not a new talking point at all. Mr.Bill Oct 2012 #11
I am sure they'll claim that Obama manipulated the unemployment numbers catbyte Oct 2012 #3
Followed by the ever predictable treestar Oct 2012 #5
"Oh sh*t moment for Romney which he should have anticipated. yellowcanine Oct 2012 #4
Obama now can use the 7.8% number every day on the campaign trail TroyD Oct 2012 #7
Gore brush Oct 2012 #8
Welcome on board! Old and In the Way Oct 2012 #9

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,401 posts)
6. The numbers are "cooked"
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:04 AM
Oct 2012

"the polls are skewed," "the liberal media is biased against conservatives," etc. So many excuses for so many failures.............

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
13. Any RATIONAL people
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:25 PM
Oct 2012

will, but I seriously worry about these people who talk of secession and "Second Amendment solutions".

I think there is a very real danger of us heading into a second civil war.

catbyte

(34,359 posts)
3. I am sure they'll claim that Obama manipulated the unemployment numbers
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 09:54 AM
Oct 2012

Most likely by siccing the Chicago chapter of the New Black Panthers on U.S. Department of Labor statisticians or some such rot.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. Followed by the ever predictable
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:03 AM
Oct 2012

Naturalizing of many new citizens just in time for them to vote (wonder why new citizens are perceived to vote for Democrats - but then in this case, they are just voting for their fellow non-natural born citizen! )

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
4. "Oh sh*t moment for Romney which he should have anticipated.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:02 AM
Oct 2012

I mean, the job numbers come out on a regular schedule. A reasonably competent campaign would know that this week's number could dump on any reference to the unemployment rate made during the debate. Also reminds people how dishonest it is to say "the unemployment rate stayed above 8% for all of Obama's Presidency" without recognizing that it has been fairly steadily dropping over the last year.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
7. Obama now can use the 7.8% number every day on the campaign trail
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:07 AM
Oct 2012

He no longer has to live under the cloud of 8%.

brush

(53,759 posts)
8. Gore
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:29 AM
Oct 2012

What's that phrase: "Elections have consequences"? God! Just think of where the country would be if Scalia and Thomas, et al, hadn't selected W Bush in 2000, the least smart of the Bush boys (well, maybe there's a tie between W and Neil, the Savings and Loan screw up). I suspect a good part of all those billions spent on two wars, plus the trillions spent on bank bailouts, would have gone into green energy development in a Gore administration. By now, 12 years later, we could have been totally energy independent, or at least on the verge of it, with a roaring economy from all the jobs created by all the new wind, solar, algae, geothermal and maybe even tidal energy industries. And I'm pretty sure he would have gotten around to tackling our antiquated infrastructure as well. More jobs there. Oh well, at least a person can dream. It's been a long, hard slog against repub obstructionism but President Obama is gradually digging us out of the 8-year hole W, Cheney, Rice, Rove, and Rumsfeld dug the country into (am I leaving out any of the culprits?). This upcoming election also will have consequences, and I'm sure those of us on this site know that they won't be good if Romney/Ryan, the lyin' duo get in. Let's all keep working for the President until Nov. 6.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
9. Welcome on board!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:39 AM
Oct 2012

Yeah, we're on common ground here, my friend. Elections do have consequences...socially shared energy self-sufficiency visions scare the shit out of those with a huge economic stake in future US energy policy (Koch Brothers, Exxon, Massey, etc). Guess who they are backing?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»R.I.P. Republican Talking...