2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTaibbi tells what Hillary said to Goldman Sachs
Even more significant than the $675,000 Hillary took from Goldman, or the $30 million in speaking income she and her husband received combined in the last 16 months, is the account of what Hillary apparently told Goldman she "thought" during those speeches.
According to Politico, who spoke to several attendees, Hillary used the opportunity to tell the bankers in attendance that the "banker-bashing so popular within both parties was unproductive and indeed foolish."
She added that the proper attitude should be, "We all got into this mess together, and we're all going to have to work together to get out of it."
This squares with Geithner's account of what Bill Clinton said. The former president told Geithner that slitting Lloyd's throat would only satisfy "them" for about two days. Them was all those pissed-off regular people, and the we or us were politicians like himself and Geithner.
In her speech, Hillary's we included the executives in her audience. Her message was basically that It Takes a Village to create a financial crisis. This was the Robin Williams breakthrough scene in Good Will Hunting, with Hillary putting a hand on the Goldmanites' shoulders, telling them, "It's not your fault. It's not your fault."
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-vampire-squid-tells-us-how-to-vote-20160205#ixzz3zXJolcjZ
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 10:38 PM - Edit history (1)
Apparently.
tblue37
(65,334 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)tblue37
(65,334 posts)makes sense? Or we both could delete and just leave your first post.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)As a latecomer, I figured it out.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)She sold us out.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Robert Rubin (Citigroup and Goldman executive) named as Treasury Secretary in the 1990's? How is that any better than George W. Bush naming Hank Paulson from Goldman to the same job? And of course there is Greenspan, who was allowed to stay in power way too long.
This is where a President Sanders could make the biggest difference. Put people like Elizabeth Warren in important spots like Federal Reserve Chairman or Treasury Secretary and send a very clear message that Wall Street does not own the executive branch of the government.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Glamrock
(11,795 posts)Y'all can start calling me Nostra-fucking-damas!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1165778
dana_b
(11,546 posts)I am shaking my head at her. How can she look us in the eyes and say the stuff that she says after these talks? Progressive? Gets things done? Take your own advice, Hillary, and cut it out!!
Glamrock
(11,795 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)Would ask her what has she done?
As senator, she voted for IWR, the bankruptcy bill and the Patriot Act
As SOS, she left a mess if Honduras, Libya and Syria
Then there's the Clinton legacy -- Bill's that is -- of NAFTA, the 1996 Telecommunications Bill, welfare deform and overturning of Glass Steagall.
Some record
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)She is a WOMAN. just in case you didn't know that.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)....and a hat tip here to 99th_Monkey for finding that article first.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)"anonymous" sources reporting the content - none of which will be good
It's almost as bad as those speculating about Romneys tax returns.
It's going to be spun as bad, forever
daleanime
(17,796 posts)a transcript, I'd like the video please.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Just a matter of time
daleanime
(17,796 posts)I know I would be taping it.
askew
(1,464 posts)I'd be surprised if she didn't. After Mitt Romney getting caught on tape, I'd imagine that is a requirement for any private event.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)is not the only tech that records video and sound.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)But they ignored him! Those high tech recorders are very small!
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)She is a sly one...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)what was offered?
IDemo
(16,926 posts)I'm so ashamed of the part I played in all of this......
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And I didn't lose my house so I'm feeling really guilty now for causing so many others to lose theirs.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Had banks offered in virtually every situation afixed mortgage rate,, perhaps higher than the rates they offered, mortgages would have been admittedlyharder to get, buthousing prces would have been better measures to buyer's wages, and we all would have been better off in the end.
It's banks and mortgage companies that are responsible for setting interest rates and terms formortgages. It's thebanks and motgagecompanies that can watch trends, that can chart the relationship between debt, income and the value of assets.
It is the responsibility of the banks and mortgage companies to vet the eligibility of the mortgage applicant for the loan including the borrower's likely capacity to repay the loan.
It is the responsibility of the lender to make sure thev borrower is. Good. Risk.
The recession was the fault of the bankers and Wall Street.
appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)profited, and by their allies in the financial corporate press. Sickening.
Duval
(4,280 posts)I'll get my husband to hang his. Too bad we don't have a dog.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)So I didn't lose my house; just my life savings.
But I console myself with the thought that I can't sell my house and downsize to something I can afford now that I can't find work. And since I can't afford to maintain it, I'm losing it year by year as it crumbles around me.
So I guess that's my atonement for my crime of helping to crash the economy.
harun
(11,348 posts)like to get in a few more "messes" like these. Seemed to work out just fine for them.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)I couldn't stand to be counted as booster of them anymore.
I did not get into this with them. I do not help them win elections, start wars for resources, deny health care, deny climate change, poison people with lead, imprison them or profit when they do.
To me, a big part of being a liberal (imho of course), is not enabling needless pain on others for personal wealth. Unlike those who count themselves as shareholders of corporations like Aetna while they pretend battle in the real world for single payer.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)Some of us saw that these mortgages had the balloons and wavering interest rates and said "no - I still can't afford that" but we STILL get the joy of paying for it! I don't blame the people who did take them though (unlike some politicians!), I blame the banks, Wall Street, etc.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)if it's at least partially based in reality.
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)And welcome to DU.
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Just go away before you and corporate paymasters do anymore harm.
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)It certainly wasn't the single Mother earning $8 an hour and who gets looked long-eyed at when she tries to buy steak with her food stamps.
It certainly wasn't the middle class Joe working 60+ hours a week to keep his head above the debt he's incurred because his wages haven't gone up and, by god, the roof needed to be fixed.
It certainly wasn't the A student who is shelling out half his $12 a hour wage to pay back his student loans, believing, erroneously, that he'd be earning far more money if he just went to college.
The only "we" here is the Royal We and that doesn't include me (or most of you here).
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)We the taxpayers bail out them the predatory billionaires.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Many of us called "Bogus" when Colin Powell came on TV and showed hi fuzzy photos, but our skepticism didn't prevent us from paying the bills. Personally, I wish they would consult me before they do some of this stuff. They could save us all a lot of trouble, and they wouldn't have to offer that lousy "we" excuse after the fact.
sorechasm
(631 posts)In fact, I think they knew what a catastrophic quagmire to humanity the Iraq War would be, but didn't care because it was a good investment to their shareholders.
They're intentionally insulting us. We (the savvy insiders) vs. Them (the gullible outsiders).
The Clintons meanwhile have by now taken so much money that when they stand in a room full of millionaires and billionaires, they can use the word "we" and not have it sound odd. The money has irrevocably moved them to that side of the ropeline. On that side of the line, public anger isn't legitimate, but something to be managed and waited out, just as Lloyd suggests.
When people like Blankfein tell us they don't take criticism personally, what they're saying is that it's too brainless and irrational to be taken any other way. He means to be insulting. And we should all take it that way.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-vampire-squid-tells-us-how-to-vote-20160205#ixzz3zXp8wCrD
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)seekthetruth
(504 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)My son was lucky enough to get into and attend an Ivy League school. The amount of money 95% of the students there had in their families was breathtaking. Just obscene. Mostly from the financial markets, because although doctors and lawyers make a good living, they actually use their bodies to make it and the amount they can work is limited. If you are in finance, the sky is the limit. Inventors, too, but they actually create something.
Market people move money around and make billions for themselves and their friends. They assure their kids go to the same schools they went to, and get each other's kids jobs. It's really a closed system unless you are very smart and have a parent like myself, who has spent thousands of hours supporting my kids, and researching schools, etc. I knew the only way for him to have an assured future would be to get into one of these schools.
It's true that many people do well from other schools if they major in some fields like engineering, etc., which he didn't want to do. So this was his sure bet, and it has paid off immensely for him. But he is the exception.
The rich, the rulers, they all have a racket going on, and only now are we getting to peer into it and complain and demand change. Clinton is now part of that racket, although she didn't start out that way. Nor did Bill Clinton. But unlike Bernie, they seem to have forgotten that the game is rigged against us, and we need our leaders to start to make the playing field more level. Bernie would at least try to do that.
Having said all that, I would vote for Hillary if she is the Dem nominee over a circus monkey because a circus monkey would do less harm as President than ANY of the Republicans.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)He's lucky he's not hanging from a tree.
appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)it was coming out of a talking head that was built to parodize Bill O'Reilly. ...This is kind of telling.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)PELLEY: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid?
BLANKFEIN: You can look at history of these things, and Social Security wasnt devised to be a system that supported you for a 30-year retirement after a 25-year career. So there will be things that, you know, the retirement age has to be changed, maybe some of the benefits have to be affected, maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised. But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained.
PELLEY: Because we cant afford them going forward?
BLANKFEIN: Because we cant afford them.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/11/20/1220051/blankfein-retirement-age/
Try taking away our SS, Lloyd, and there will be Hell to pay (and I don't mean fines).
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)No other Trashmen's organization would ask me to speak before them.
On the other hand; If I went in and told the Trashmen present how wonderful they were and how much the world needed them, I'd be invited to speak to every Trashmen's Association event from now to whenever.
Anyone curious about what was said to the bankers in private would probably look at a car with foggy windows at a Drive-In Theater and wonder what was going on inside.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)She knows if those transcripts are released; she'll have a Romney 47% moment.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Transcripts can be scrubbed. Video evidence is what nailed Romney. But anyway I think people are putting too much emphasis on the speeches. I'm more concerned about the corporate campaign donations not just of the Clintons, but 99% of the other politicians in this country. That's the bigger issue. It's a fundamental flaw in the system.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Honestly, I'm not that interested in the transcripts. The fact that the banks are willing to pay her so much to speak is damning enough.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Should all be in jail.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)obscured the underlying sketchiness of the underlying assets of, which were sliced and diced to make those things!
They did it of their own (albeit misled) volition!
And similarly, when you bet against the very economic indicators which were dependent upon the crap products you had been peddling to others, thereby making out like MASSIVE FUCKING BANDITS on the collapse that you, yourselves engineered, WHOCANBLAMEYA?
Am I right?
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)I am smart, have a Masters degree, and would have no clue. None.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, grasswire.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I doubt it, but maybe, this means her campaign is beginning to comprehend that this ("banker-bashing so popular within both parties was unproductive and indeed foolish." is an expression of anger that people working 2 jobs, unable to afford health insurance, and trying to raise children.
The way she disregards the people who are living that experience is infuriating. Given the current and ongoing damage to families that Clinton era policies have imposed, it turns my stomach when she tries to talk about all she has done for children.
fierywoman
(7,683 posts)Isn't it just a matter of time before a 99%-er waiter at the next HRD speech to raise money from banksters just happens to leave his smart phone on, a la the Romney 47% speech. Can't wait, can't wait !!!
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Her entire persona is mythology, illusion and fakery.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)The old folks don't get it.
Duval
(4,280 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She's progressive! Really!!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)tweet it, fb it, reddit it....
WE made Wall Street cheat us. They're counting on WE to fix it with THEM. Hillary said so.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)This was a huge failure of leadership. Own it.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)radhika
(1,008 posts)Like when he made his famous statement as to why they would not be prosecuted (look forward, not back) And they used bad judgement, but didn't really break laws.
When he picked Geitner and Summers for his to Finance pros
When he made Wall Street friendly Eric Holder AG
When Jaime Dimon was one of the most frequent visitors to the White House, at least per official logs.
Someone got some shoulder rubs, indeed. I hope someday we get to learn of those speeches and those private conversations too. I strongly suspect Taibbi is on this even as we speak.
DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)I hope you are right that Taibbi is on it. Feel like we were totally sold out.
askew
(1,464 posts)He is 200x the person Hillary is and as much as Bernie supporters don't want to give credit to Obama, he has been the best president since LBJ. He's going to be be remembered as an extraordinary president.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)brentspeak
(18,290 posts)Wall Street "paid everything back!" and "the government made a profit!", so now the World has been Made Right Again, right? The fact that the peons will have to learn to like eating dog food is not important -- all part of the "shared sacrifice".
Autumn
(45,056 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Funny she all of a sudden cares about "them" in Flint.
Phony baloney she is.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)sexism!
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)jen63
(813 posts)He's a treasure.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)jalan48
(13,859 posts)Fuck this we shit Hillary.
elmac
(4,642 posts)I didn't make the mess but I had to pay for it. The banksters and rich elite make the mess but we the people always bail them out.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)There is a lot of misinformation about the original TARP program and what it was supposed to do. It was intended to help both financial industry and homeowners. But it was highjacked by both parties.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/secret-and-lies-of-the-bailout-20130104
http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/82091:tarp-ii-money-for-banks-not-homeowners
TARP II, the second helping of $350 billion that is supposed to restore the health of our financial system, will soon be dished out by the Obama administration. Ostensibly, much of this money will go to help homeowners stay in their homes. But, as is the case with many Washington policies, this money is also going to end up in the bankers' pockets.
You are absolutely right. In the end, the rich got it all. Many people do not realize that funds were earmarked for homeowners So this was even more corrupt than it appears on the surface.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)because she certainly does not speak for anyone in the Democratic party with that kind of crap spout.... We all did not get in this together... the banks ripped off the working class people and when people lost their jobs they no longer could pay their mortgages so the government stepped up and used taxpayer money to bail them out so they can continue to soak we the poor and working class and she is just fine with that? I guess when you make millions from the super rich you actually feel that way... Hillary represents me about as much as Donald Trump does....
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)They would have to be redacted to the point of being usless
it would end her support except by the most right wingnuts of the 'democratic' party.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)But not when it's time to spread the wealth...
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)The Hillary Clinton character (Susan Stanton) is confronted by long time campaign staffer (Libby, played by Kathy Bates) after Libby finds out what the Stantons are willing to do to win an election. It doesn't mean anything to ruin an innocent person.
Susan Stanton:
That was a long time ago.... Libby, you said it yourself. We were young.
We didn't know how the world worked. Now we know.
Like Hillary said, "I've been through this before"...
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)for this? She can't have it both ways, youcking it up behind the scenes and then lying to our faces.... Please some Hillary defender somewhere explain and defend this to me?
Gary 50
(381 posts)Hillary has put you in your place. But of course you were not meant to hear it. This wasn't a message for the peons but about the peons. Don't worry Goldman, Hillary has your back. Money well spent.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)of human lives, of families, of their their futures (or were equally responsible as the the victims) is in effing-lie.
An effing lie.
Lives were ruined. For a short primer, look at "The Big Short" but there is more culpability than that, much more.
This is only one of the 1,001 plus reasons to support Bernie.
Go Bernie!!!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)keep it coming..
we knew it had to be something like this. combine more of these revelations with the video of her laughing about releasing the transcripts....
the ads really write themselves....
klook
(12,154 posts)That's it in a nutshell. Every time you hear somebody say the criticism of Wall Street institutions is naive or misplaced, or "that's all SO nine years ago," remember that this summary by Matt Taibbi is the truth of what happened.
The criminals who profited from this corrupt scheme were richly rewarded for their trouble, retained their positions of power and influence, and very much want to be able to laugh Bernie Sanders and his campaign out of the room.
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)I saw the title of the article on an earlier post and decided not to click on "vampire squid"!
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)love Wall St.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)underpants
(182,772 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Say goodbye, Gracie.
krawhitham
(4,643 posts)Fla Dem
(23,650 posts)No attribution to where he got this "account"
Again no direct quotes or attributions and Politico is a RW leaning publication.
Taibbi's interpretation of the unsourced comments is that "we all" is the general public. My interpretation could be she didn't mean the general public when she supposedly said "we all"; she meant the government and politicians.
Taibbi woud fail a first year journalism course.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)media alternative for those seeking "truth in reporting". imo
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)WhiteHat
(129 posts)Here's the actual fact:
Bankers know with more than 99% accuracy which home loans are reliable to what degree. It's their business to know. When they write loans of different terms, they KNOW the percentages of failures, and plan for it.
When they write loans with more than a 30% failure rate, as we saw in the Bush years, banks EXPECT that failure rate, and they were/are absolutely correct. When the real estate market collapsed in 1998, they reaped their rewards.
Since Bill Clinton killed off Glass-Steagall, banks have been perfectly willing to assume 100% ownership of the properties they've underwritten, because after the departure of Glass-Steagall they could become property owners, something that was not allowed before. But the norm today. The majority of "middle-class" homes are rentals today, not owned by individuals.
It's actually the best investment banks can make since Glass-Steagall disappeared. During the Bush years, it was in the banks' best interest was to write impossible loans. Bush economic policy, led by Alan Greenspan (who has since admitted his mistake) literally drove banks into the real estate property management business, driving individual home owners out.
That's a HUGE change in banks' role in the ENTIRE US economy, with the expected result: In my father's time, it was expected for middle-class families to own their own home. Today, if you own a home in an economically successful region of America it means you are not middle class, you are the privileged.
Ahem. Hillary does not rent.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Sofa King Interesting.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)the money will flood into the Clinton Foundation. The two of them will be so rich they won't need to kiss Lloyd Blankfein's ring anymore.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Thats what she said anyway in that debate.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Romney's 47% speech comes to mind.....