Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
90 Precincts not correctly recorded - due to understaffing---- (Original Post) bettyellen Feb 2016 OP
Shenanigans! eom NowSam Feb 2016 #1
link? awake Feb 2016 #2
It's on CNN now- a reporter was at the airport w/ Sanders and staff..... bettyellen Feb 2016 #6
sounds like they want them to go back do their own recounts- or recreations? bettyellen Feb 2016 #3
link? tk2kewl Feb 2016 #4
live CNN now- they got it from Sanders people at the airport. The party wants to... bettyellen Feb 2016 #10
Who is asking? snot Feb 2016 #5
Sanders people are saying "the party" is asking for this- because they were understaffed?!?!? bettyellen Feb 2016 #8
DWS has a sad. PowerToThePeople Feb 2016 #11
. tk2kewl Feb 2016 #17
this is pissing me off. i thought it was a great night for everyone, dammit. bettyellen Feb 2016 #30
I call BS florida08 Feb 2016 #7
Yep MissDeeds Feb 2016 #14
OMG MissDeeds Feb 2016 #9
if they are at 98% now- how many pcts are not counted, I wonder? bettyellen Feb 2016 #13
MSNBC now reporting MissDeeds Feb 2016 #29
she really didn't declare victory, she pretty much acknowledged it's her and Bernie now. bettyellen Feb 2016 #33
That's not what I saw MissDeeds Feb 2016 #36
no- Maddow and them said flat out it was not a victory speech after they heard it..... bettyellen Feb 2016 #37
We'll agree to disagree MissDeeds Feb 2016 #40
Well, then you weren't watching NBC after the speech- because that is ALL they talked about bettyellen Feb 2016 #42
TYT noted the same thing. Half-Century Man Feb 2016 #53
I'm seeing that complete bullshit treated as gospel here, LOL. bettyellen Feb 2016 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author MissDeeds Feb 2016 #48
spellcheck is kicking my ass- but what is your excuse? bettyellen Feb 2016 #49
Also, why has the updating re- the remaining unreported precincts slowed to a snail's pace? snot Feb 2016 #12
It looks like they think they lost some totals? Not sure! bettyellen Feb 2016 #15
Reported on Bernie TV - Bernie is waiting until all precincts have reported and if things still look in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #16
What sort of raw data would have been generated? Especially for an unstaffed precinct? n/t winter is coming Feb 2016 #19
They must be wrong but they said the pct captains would have to come back and "recreate" the votes? bettyellen Feb 2016 #24
This makes no sense. Seems very odd. n/t winter is coming Feb 2016 #26
Yes, because they just added another 1% of the vote? How big is 90 pcts? bettyellen Feb 2016 #28
I don't have the website open now but there were only fifty-something precincts outstanding. winter is coming Feb 2016 #31
It looks like they believe too much was botched and has to be redone somehow? bettyellen Feb 2016 #35
You'll have to ask Bernie. I just reported what I heard. Raw data = paper totals before they go into in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #27
CNN made it sound like everyone thinks it is needed? More than the who they kept saying the bettyellen Feb 2016 #21
Wow! Kicked and recced Arazi Feb 2016 #18
What a system. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #20
I like it- more good press for Dems! We don't have people celebrating 30% of the vote, LOL! bettyellen Feb 2016 #22
Where's Rehnquist when you need him? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #23
love your pilates cat! bettyellen Feb 2016 #25
That's how I feel now... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #43
Is this a repeat of 2012? We found out who really won Iowa after the election in November, NT Stellar Feb 2016 #32
I thought the tie was a great story! This is ruining my night, those fuck ups. bettyellen Feb 2016 #34
seems like DNC'd let it go, given that Polk Co went pretty heavily for Clinton tk2kewl Feb 2016 #38
I think it was awesome night, no matter. I doubt it will mean one delegate difference. bettyellen Feb 2016 #39
i of course agree that it was a great night tk2kewl Feb 2016 #41
CNN still says so, someone on another thread says the DNC denies it..... bettyellen Feb 2016 #44
thanks tk2kewl Feb 2016 #45
Rachel Maddow is as dumbfounded as I am, LOL. She is stuttering..... and just showed the bettyellen Feb 2016 #47
NY Daily News - Dead Clown Walking tk2kewl Feb 2016 #50
Considering he had NO ground game, while Cruz was massively organized, Trump actually tblue37 Feb 2016 #51
Trying to figure out those hateful morons..... my head hurts. UGH. bettyellen Feb 2016 #52
live report from Clinton's people from Andrea Mitchell- two top aides say they believe they did win. bettyellen Feb 2016 #46
DU thread reporting on coin tosses to determine Hill as "winner" wordpix Feb 2016 #55
No do-overs. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #56
PARTY ESTABLISHMENT SHENANIGANS!!! Odin2005 Feb 2016 #57
this is not a surprise restorefreedom Feb 2016 #58
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
10. live CNN now- they got it from Sanders people at the airport. The party wants to...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:00 AM
Feb 2016

sounds like a recount of 90 pcts, but not sure why they are calling it "recreating" the votes. Odd.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
13. if they are at 98% now- how many pcts are not counted, I wonder?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:01 AM
Feb 2016

Has to be less than 90%. So odd. And now it's at 99% and split even. WOW.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
29. MSNBC now reporting
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:14 AM
Feb 2016

on problems with failure to staff ninety precients. The heiress anointed herself winner before the votes were counted. Yeah, that's democratic.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
33. she really didn't declare victory, she pretty much acknowledged it's her and Bernie now.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:17 AM
Feb 2016

Neither did Bernie.
I thought that was pretty cool. They both had to make statements before midnight, and they did.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
37. no- Maddow and them said flat out it was not a victory speech after they heard it.....
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:26 AM
Feb 2016

it was just speculation beforehand- LOL- that it was going to be a victory speech. the closest thing she said was she was breathing a sigh of relief, and looked forward to debating Bernie.


LOL, stop repeating nonsense.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
40. We'll agree to disagree
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:30 AM
Feb 2016

The nine people here with me watching the results see it differently.


Nonsense much? We have a difference of opinion. No need to be rude.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
42. Well, then you weren't watching NBC after the speech- because that is ALL they talked about
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:33 AM
Feb 2016

for 3-5 minutes after her speech ended. And they were unanimous. so yeah- they did not call it a victory speech.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
54. I'm seeing that complete bullshit treated as gospel here, LOL.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:59 AM
Feb 2016

Just saw it in another OP. People are actually posting completely contrary to what the MSNBC reporters said after the speech. I am shocked, LOL!

Response to bettyellen (Reply #13)

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
16. Reported on Bernie TV - Bernie is waiting until all precincts have reported and if things still look
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:03 AM
Feb 2016

fishy, he's calling for all Raw data to be released for a recount.

New scandal brewing - 90 precincts NOT STAFFED! OUTRAGEOUS.

PEACE
LOVE
BE

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
24. They must be wrong but they said the pct captains would have to come back and "recreate" the votes?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:10 AM
Feb 2016

Very odd choice of words. Now they are at 99%?!?! What?

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
31. I don't have the website open now but there were only fifty-something precincts outstanding.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:16 AM
Feb 2016

So are they possibly going to correct/change vote totals?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
35. It looks like they believe too much was botched and has to be redone somehow?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:20 AM
Feb 2016

Now they are at 50/50% again, with 99% showing. It was .02 different a moment ago at 99%. LOL.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
27. You'll have to ask Bernie. I just reported what I heard. Raw data = paper totals before they go into
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:13 AM
Feb 2016

the Microsoft app? I don't know.

The unstaffed precincts (90) just aren't being counted at all, or the citizens did the counting? Again, I don't know.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
21. CNN made it sound like everyone thinks it is needed? More than the who they kept saying the
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:07 AM
Feb 2016

people (including pct captains) had to come back and recreate their tallies. But I thought the initial report was he talked with people at both campaigns, but later he kept mentioning Sanders.
So, no tally tonight. Meh, it;s the best tie ever, I guess.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
43. That's how I feel now...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:34 AM
Feb 2016

Just came back after a hot shower (should be asleep) and I may as well hang it like this little guy!

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
38. seems like DNC'd let it go, given that Polk Co went pretty heavily for Clinton
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:26 AM
Feb 2016

53.2 - 46.1

something seems fishy

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
41. i of course agree that it was a great night
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:30 AM
Feb 2016

this redo thing is pretty weird though. i'm not watching the teevee, are they still talking about it?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
44. CNN still says so, someone on another thread says the DNC denies it.....
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:35 AM
Feb 2016

I know the original thing came from a reporter saying he was literally with Sanders and staff and that is where he learned of it. Unclear who exactly says the recount is needed? All but 3 delegates counted?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
47. Rachel Maddow is as dumbfounded as I am, LOL. She is stuttering..... and just showed the
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:45 AM
Feb 2016

front pages of the Iowa register and the NY Daily News. Trump is painted as a clown in the News, LOL.
The Register called it a draw for Dems. Cool.

tblue37

(65,319 posts)
51. Considering he had NO ground game, while Cruz was massively organized, Trump actually
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:56 AM
Feb 2016

did pretty well in Iowa.

The media are deliberately running a narrative about what a huge loser Trump is for coming in second, but Cruz's evangelical appeal was always going to make him an Iowa favorite among the Republicans, and evangelical attendance at the GOP caucuses was slightly over 65%.

Trump has a 28 point lead in NH, I think, so he is likely to win there and in some other early states. I guess the media are trying out the narrative of his being a big loser as a way of amping up the all-important horserace aspect on the GOP side.

I think Rubio is more dangerous than Trump , because Rubio has the backing of the deep pocket donors now that Bush has washed out, and Rubio is just slick enough to fool low-information voters.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
46. live report from Clinton's people from Andrea Mitchell- two top aides say they believe they did win.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:37 AM
Feb 2016

they had internal tallies, so they believe so. But the tally might not have been final when Hillary spoke. But they seem sure now. They were not aware about the 90 pct dispute while taking off- and say that must be coming from Sanders camp.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
58. this is not a surprise
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:39 AM
Feb 2016

we knew the establishment would not go down easy

and we have to be prepared for anything

fortunately, bernies team is ready.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»90 Precincts not correctl...