HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion: Primaries (Forum) » Gutierrez Slams Gingrich ...

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 11:58 AM

Gutierrez Slams Gingrich on Floor of House

Rep. Guierrez blasts Gingrich with Facts. Video at Link. This video is hilarious !!

"Who's the Real Food Stamp President". Somebody needs to confront Newt with this at the next "debate".


Mr. Gutierrez then takes us on a fact filled adventure with lots of interesting charts. Here are those facts and figures for your delectation:
1.The food stamp president increased spending by more than 19 billion dollars
2.The amount of people in the program increased to 11 million.
3.Benefits were increased $27.38 per recipient, the largest increase under any president in the last thirty years.

Who is this giver of benefits? This food stamp president? George W. Bush. That’s right, you read it correctly. Mr. Gutierrez then goes on to agree that yes, indeed, there has been another food stamp president:

“Yet under another food stamp president spending increased by more than 9 billion dollars, the number of recipients increased by 7 million, and the amount of the benefit increased by $17. Yep. Show ‘em who it is. Here he is, George Herbert Walker Bush was also the food stamp president. See it runs in the family, food stamp president senior, and food stamp president junior. It’s hereditary. A rampant family disease that makes them just wanna feed poor people. Hungry poor people.”

“And this one’s for Newt Gingrich. Just in case-just in case, his food stamp president name calling was designed to make a political point; that he wasn’t quite so willing to come right out and say, of the recipient whose race we know, 22% of SNAP recipients are black. 34% are white. Because hunger knows no race, or religion, or age, or political party. Hunger is color blind, Mr. Gingrich.”

7 replies, 1482 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Gutierrez Slams Gingrich on Floor of House (Original post)
K Gardner Feb 2012 OP
stopbush Feb 2012 #1
RKP5637 Feb 2012 #2
K Gardner Feb 2012 #3
mucifer Feb 2012 #5
ellenfl Feb 2012 #4
Tarheel_Dem Feb 2012 #6
butterfly77 Feb 2012 #7

Response to K Gardner (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:09 PM

1. The only problem with this line of attack is that there's nothing wrong with food stamps!!

We should actually be saluting Poppy and Junior for increasing the benefit amount for food stamp recipients. That was a humane thing to do.

The Rs have framed food stamps as a program for ne'er-do-wells. Liberals make a BIG mistake buying into the RW framing of this program. We'd be better off spending the few seconds it would take to reframe food stamps in a positive light than spending precious time playing tit-for-tat on the RW playing field.

It's sort of like those promos for Ed Schultz on MSNBC where he ends by saying, "where are the jobs?" That line may have worked last year, but it's counter productive to use that line when the D narrative should be that job creation under Obama is reaching impressive levels.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to stopbush (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:31 PM

3. That's exactly what I said on my FB page: GOD BLESS EM FOR

FEEDING THE HUNGRY ! These facts actually came out a while back, and I've successfully beaten back more than a few RWers with their FS Graphs, by using the facts. It is a demeaning slam, especially since half on Supplemental Nutrition Programs are CHILDREN and a fair amount are our MILITARY ! The morons just have to quit using this argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to stopbush (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:50 PM

5. you should watch the whole video he spent a lot of time on why food stamps are good.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread