Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:49 PM

Eugene (15,548 posts)

Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa

Source: BBC

8 August 2012 Last updated at 17:06 GMT

Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa

By Pallab Ghosh
Science correspondent, BBC News

Fossils from Northern Kenya show that a new species of human lived two million years ago, researchers say.

The discoveries suggests that at least three distinct species of humans co-existed in Africa.

The research adds to a growing body of evidence that runs counter to the popular perception that there was a linear evolution from monkey to ape to modern human.

The research has been published in the journal Nature.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19184370

7 replies, 1544 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

7 replies	Author	Time	Post
Many human 'prototypes' coexisted in Africa (Original post)	Eugene	Aug 2012	OP
This message was self-deleted by its author	darkangel218	Aug 2012	#1
Libertarians. n/t	teenagebambam	Aug 2012	#2
I have heard it described as	exboyfil	Aug 2012	#3
this makes sense. i've always questioned the linear model. It doesn't make sense at	samsingh	Aug 2012	#4
Linear evolution the popular perception?	Curmudgeoness	Aug 2012	#5
Speciation today...	dangin	Aug 2012	#6
Heh, heh!	jamesatemple	Aug 2012	#7

Response to Eugene (Original post)

darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.

Response to darkangel218 (Reply #1)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:01 PM

teenagebambam (1,393 posts)

2. Libertarians. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:03 PM

exboyfil (3,399 posts)

3. I have heard it described as

more of a bush which is pretty typical for organism evolution. That is why it is kind of silly to talk about missing links. The probability of finding an organism in the direct lineage is excedingly small (and you would never know it was either).

Trying to communicate and picture the times involved makes understanding evolution for complex organisms like mammals very difficult. I like to think about it terms of generations of animals and extrapolate something like a wolf to chihuahua and the amount of time which that took.

Reply to this post

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 05:14 PM

samsingh (10,352 posts)

4. this makes sense. i've always questioned the linear model. It doesn't make sense at

an evolutionary level. Animals in different parts of the world would evolve differently so there should be several types of humanoids.

Reply to this post

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 08:23 PM

Curmudgeoness (10,509 posts)

5. Linear evolution the popular perception?

I was in college biology 40 years ago, and that was not the way it was suggested at that time. How long ago was a linear model acceptable.

The only people who think it is linear are the anti-evolutionist, who "didn't come from a monkey" or argue why there are still monkeys and apes. Valid argument if you believe in a linear model.

Reply to this post

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Aug 10, 2012, 06:56 AM

dangin (75 posts)

6. Speciation today...

1st it is interesting that this may have been predicted in opening of 2001 space odyssey by the competing primate groups, one of which "wins" evolution's race by developing tool use.

Second, I'm a highly educated urban elitist intellectual with in-laws in the rural sticks who only watch Fox news. If this keeps up among humans for several hundred millinia we will speciate again. Homo-sapiens-foxamericanus is going to be an ugly, mean little species.

Reply to this post

Response to dangin (Reply #6)

Fri Aug 10, 2012, 08:08 AM

jamesatemple (261 posts)

7. Heh, heh!

Now that's downright funny. I don't recall the name of the wit that suggested, "Some folks claim that Man sprang from the Ape. Well, I reckon that could be true. But it seems to me that some folks didn't spring as far as others."

Reply to this post

Science (Group)