Mon Dec 3, 2012, 05:57 AM
bananas (20,292 posts)
Mega-risks that could drive us to extinctionhttp://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22534-megarisks-that-could-drive-us-to-extinction.html
Mega-risks that could drive us to extinction 17:26 26 November 2012 by Andy Coghlan The end is not nigh, but it could be unless we constrain our own technological ingenuity. That's the warning from an initiative in Cambridge, UK, that wants to create a centre to focus on huge, technological hazards that could wipe out the human race at a stroke. These dangers would include robots that escape our control, nuclear war, doomsday plagues designed in laboratories, and devastation from climate change triggered by human activity. "We're talking about threats to our very existence stemming from human activity," says Martin Rees, a professor of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge. Along with Cambridge philosopher Huw Price and Jaan Tallinn, inventor of Skype, he has founded the Cambridge Project for Existential Risk. Rees says we focus too much on tiny risks that are widespread, such as trace contaminants in food, and too little on massive, one-off risks that could wipe us out. To counteract this, Rees, Price and Tallinn are proposing creating a Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge. <snip>
|
4 replies, 470 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| bananas | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| Javaman | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| jeff47 | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| Javaman | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| muriel_volestrangler | Dec 2012 | #4 |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 11:16 AM
Javaman (40,858 posts)
1. +5 degree C is an extinction event.
|
and that is what we are facing as a race.
|
Response to Javaman (Reply #1)
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 05:31 PM
jeff47 (7,900 posts)
2. No, it really isn't.
|
Lots of humans will die, yes. Lots of plants and animals may go extinct.
But not every human will die. |
Response to jeff47 (Reply #2)
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:49 AM
Javaman (40,858 posts)
3. Oh thanks for the clarification
|
I'm so glad we will still be around to refuck the planet 10,000 years from now. |
Response to bananas (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:29 AM
muriel_volestrangler (65,853 posts)
4. They should call it the Department of Observation and Measurement of Scientific Work
|
or 'Doomwatch': http://www.clivebanks.co.uk/Doomwatch%20Intro.htm
|

