Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 03:31 PM Feb 2012

Religious Freedom Act in Kansas Legislature draws praise, criticism

By Adam Strunk
Eagle Topeka bureau
Published Monday, Feb. 13, 2012, at 10:28 p.m

Proponents say the Preservation of Religious Freedom Act would protect Kansans’ right to practice their religion. Opponents see it as an open door to discrimination and lawsuits.

The bill, HB 2260, will have a hearing before the state House Judiciary Committee this morning. It would prohibit state institutions from curtailing or denying a person’s exercise of religion, unless government has a compelling reason to do so.

It also would allow people to sue state institutions and local governments for infringing on their religious freedom.

Rep. Lance Kinzer, R-Olathe, who introduced the bill, said it seeks to make sure Kansans’ religious beliefs are respected.

http://www.kansas.com/2012/02/13/2215085/religious-freedom-act-in-kansas.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Religious Freedom Act in Kansas Legislature draws praise, criticism (Original Post) rug Feb 2012 OP
What are your feelings on this?? Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #1
I have to compare it with the RFRA first. rug Feb 2012 #4
Per usual - Whats the matter with Kansas? benld74 Feb 2012 #2
Yeah this is about "religious freedom" alright. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #3
Hmmm what we have here is a "Nomel" test dmallind Feb 2012 #5
We successfully got it stalled last year. MuseRider Feb 2012 #6
Update MuseRider Feb 2012 #7
Thanks for the update. rug Feb 2012 #8
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. I have to compare it with the RFRA first.
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 03:56 PM
Feb 2012

"Kinzer also said the bill would work to restore a federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, to the state level.

"The Supreme Court had ruled in 1997 that the law applied only at the federal level. That law has similar language to the current bill."

I don't like to give reflexive answers.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
3. Yeah this is about "religious freedom" alright.
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 03:48 PM
Feb 2012

The freedom for god-fearing christians to do what they want. I'm guessing the law will not be interpreted so favorably to protect the godless and muslims and jews and.....

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
5. Hmmm what we have here is a "Nomel" test
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 03:57 PM
Feb 2012

Give this about three minutes even with this SCOTUS. Unless of course they just say "yes, and preventing establishment is always a compelling reason", leaving us precisely as is.

MuseRider

(34,105 posts)
6. We successfully got it stalled last year.
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 05:18 PM
Feb 2012

This year it is worse. Effective as of July 1 (I think that is the date) any institution in this state that takes tax money can be sued by anyone who thinks their inclusive anti discrimination policies hurts them because of their religion. It is specifically targeted at LGBT inclusion. This will wipe out any inclusion in any city that has it, any school system, any of the universities etc. It is a very very bad bill. I am on pins and needles waiting to hear what happens. The secretaries were laughing when I called, apparently both sides were mobilized. Even emails did not get through. We did our work, we have done our homework, our executive director is making a very well done statement but in the end it will be what this committee decides and there is really no doubt if it makes it to the floor for a vote it will pass.

It is a bash the gays bill. Lance Kinzer was livid last year when we managed to get it blocked. It was renewed by Democrat Jan Pauls. It was still blocked.

The odd thing is that our polling shows that the majority of Kansas does not want this. The only poll that showed they were against was should we allow marriage equality. Our legislators and our governor do not care, they do not like the gays and want to stop all the progress we have made here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Religious Freedom Act in ...