Religion
Related: About this forumExtremist Religious Views Dominate The News But Don’t Represent The Faiths
Sep 13, 2012 at 4:33 pm
By Jack Jenkins
If you turned on the news anytime this past week, you were probably greeted with at least one of the following images: angry people shouting and burning American flags, an American pastor making snide remarks about Islam, or the charred, graffiti-covered remains of the U.S. Consulate in Libya.
The images, of course, documented the recent killing of Christopher Stevens, U.S. Ambassador to Libya, and other American diplomats by militants, and the uproar in the Middle East over an allegedly American-made film mocking the Prophet Muhammad. In response, right-wing pundits were quick to weigh in with an old narrative: the social and religious differences of the West and the Middle East are insurmountable, and will inevitably lead to violence.
But you might not have seen this: hundreds of Libyan men, women and children assembled in the streets of Benghazi, holding up signs with slogans that read: Thugs and Killers dont represent Benghazi or Islam, Chris Stevens was a friend to all Libyans, and Sorry People of America this not behavior of Islam or profit [sic].
You also probably didnt hear about the Coptic Christians who joined Muslims in expressing peaceful disapproval of the film, or an Israeli Rabbi who condemned both the film and the attacks on the American diplomats.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/13/847201/extremist-religious-views-dominate-the-news-dont-represent/?mobile=nc
SarahM32
(270 posts)But no, I wasn't playing Meg Ryan pretending to have an orgasm.
I'm so glad you posted the title that says that the extremists who claim to be Jews or Christians or Muslims don't represent their faiths.
The problem, as I've said before, is the distortion of religion by Theocrats who want to rule in the name of religion.
And as for all the uproar, the article is quite right. We don't hear or see any of the good stuff, because the news media has become like tabloid media, covering the most sensational or the most controversial stuff and ignoring their ethical duty as journalists.
There's plenty of blame to go around for the state of the world today.
Despite all, there's always a good sandwich.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)no argument there. Not everyone that loves mohammed is a killer. No argument there.
When the people that stormed the embassy are caught and murdered, they'll be right on top of that too.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)and the other Americans in Libya does not appear to from the people who were protesting the movie. The attack does not appear to have been spontaneous but a well planned attack and has some elements an an Al-Qaeda attack. Rachel Maddow had an interesting segment on this last night on MSNBC.
It would appear that the premise of this article concerning the incident in Libya is incorrect.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:19 AM - Edit history (1)
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)But then again, letting the zealots be the face of faith in this nation for so long has done wonderful things as far as helping folks realize it's all bullshit anyhow.
Julie
rug
(82,333 posts)See you on the ramparts.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)the behavior of "churched"? I mean, really?
Julie
rug
(82,333 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/letters/42_11_30.htm
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Then again, they all are, aren't they?
for the literal-minded and believers everywhere.
rug
(82,333 posts)I suppose it provides a sense of triumph when you attack a position few have.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Yes, few. Come up with something more accurate and more recent.
edhopper
(33,476 posts)Unfortunately one of our two political parties has embraced some of the most extremist religious views of Christianity in this country.
But they have embraced such ridiculous positions the republicans may well have destroyed themselves.