Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:06 PM
cbayer (125,985 posts)
Health, faith and birth control - LA Times editorial
Last edited Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)
A for-profit company should not be able to decline to offer contraception coverage based on religious reasons. Such a firm is in no way analogous to a parochial school, which can at least claim a basis for declining coverage.
July 31, 2012, 4:44 p.m.
Several Roman Catholic organizations have challenged Obama administration rules requiring religious colleges and hospitals (but not churches themselves) to offer preventive healthcare, including contraceptive coverage, with no deductibles or co-pays. Even though the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of most of the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), the courts still have to decide whether those institutions are exempt from the contraception requirement under a federal law called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Our view is that church-affiliated charitable and educational institutions should offer such coverage, even if they are self-insured. Not all of their employees are Catholic, and even many Catholics make a personal choice to use contraceptives. The Obama administration's decision to provide only a narrow religious exemption is the right one.
That said, religious colleges and hospitals are at least part of a church's religious mission, so the discussion makes sense. The same cannot be said for a company that sells heating, ventilation and air conditioning services. Yet a federal judge in Colorado is taking seriously a complaint by Hercules Industries, an HVAC company owned by a Catholic family, that the contraceptive mandate violates its rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Senior U.S. District Judge John L. Kane issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the contraceptive mandate against Hercules.
Enacted in 1993 with bipartisan support, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act allows believers to opt out of generally applicable laws that "substantially burden" their free exercise of religion — unless the law in question serves a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.
more at link
1 replies, 403 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Health, faith and birth control - LA Times editorial (Original post)
Response to cbayer (Original post)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:52 PM
HockeyMom (11,533 posts)
1. While they might be able to argue that
if you don't believe in Catholic teachings, then don't work for a Catholic organization. What are you supposed to do about working for a PRIVATE business? ASK them before you are hired if they are Catholic and birth control is against THEIR religion? That is crazy, if for no other reason, they are under no legal obligation to tell their employees what religion they are, let alone ask an employee.
Major, major problem trying to make private employers exempt.