Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
Thu Dec 22, 2011, 10:48 PM Dec 2011

Which would get boring first? Heaven or Hell?

My guess is that Heaven would get mind-numbingly dull pretty quick.

Hell, on the other hand, could get interesting if the punishments get fetishized. Of course, boredom would set in without fail.

What do you think?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which would get boring first? Heaven or Hell? (Original Post) laconicsax Dec 2011 OP
Well, what about limbo? ret5hd Dec 2011 #1
The Pope says it doesn't exist. laconicsax Dec 2011 #3
Depends on what the rent is Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #2
If you can't pay, what happens? laconicsax Dec 2011 #4
If I am in heaven I just ask for forgivness Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #8
Nothing more boring than thinking about the ridiculous concept that either exists Starboard Tack Dec 2011 #5
What if you were forced to think about it? laconicsax Dec 2011 #6
How can you be forced to think about something? Starboard Tack Dec 2011 #7
Influencing someone's thoughts is easy. laconicsax Dec 2011 #9
Neither would be boring. Silent3 Dec 2011 #10
I'm just glad neither one exists outside human imagination. nt moobu2 Dec 2011 #11

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
7. How can you be forced to think about something?
Thu Dec 22, 2011, 11:39 PM
Dec 2011

Especially something that only exists in the imagination of others.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
9. Influencing someone's thoughts is easy.
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 12:36 AM
Dec 2011

At one extreme is neuro-linguistic programming and other similar processes, which can be like mind control.

At another extreme, this thread is forcing you to commit at least a sliver of mental effort to the concepts.

Silent3

(15,178 posts)
10. Neither would be boring.
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 01:15 AM
Dec 2011

I don't believe either heaven or hell are real places, of course, but if I imagine places (or states of being) worthy of those names, boredom doesn't seem to be a likely problem.

For me, "heaven" is, by definition, a place or state of being which is immensely pleasurable. Since boredom is not pleasurable, boredom simply would not exist in heaven. Even if available activities in heaven were limited and repetitive and monotonous by our pre-death standards, for heaven to truly be heaven, our heavenly selves would have to be immune to, or incapable of, boredom.

Perhaps brief moments of fleeting boredom could occur in a place or condition worthy of the name "heaven", but then they'd only exist to heighten by contrast the pleasure of having that boredom relieved.

As for hell, it is by definition a place of great and unending suffering. While boredom might be one item on a long menu of torments, I can't see it as one of the greater threats when suffering like having all of your fingernails and toenails ripped out while hot irons were stabbed into your eyes and spiders were bursting forth from every pore of your skin would be considered a relief from the more serious torture you'd routinely endure.

Just as with my idea of heaven, where boredom is either very rare or non-existent by definition, in a "true" hell there would be no "getting used to it", no adaptation, no "tuning it out". For hell to be hell, every torment would remain as horribly painful and terrifying the seven quadrillionth time as the first time.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Which would get boring fi...