Religion
Related: About this forumClint Eastwood, Bard of Competence
The directors latest film eschews his typically epic cinematic themes to revel in an everyday miracle: being good at ones job.
MEGAN GARBER
7:00 AM ET
In the days after US Airways Flight 1549 ditched into the Hudson River, with all 155 people aboard the plane surviving the impact, the water landing came to be known as the miracle on the Hudson. The term came from the movies: We had a Miracle on 34th Street, New Yorks then-governor, David Paterson, said in a speech hailing the heroics that made for the successful water landing. He paused. I believe now we have had a Miracle on the Hudson.
In his upcoming movie about the fated flight, Sullynamed, of course, for the pilot who guided the Airbus to safety that dayClint Eastwood frames that miracle in more prosaic (you could also say more humanist) terms. Here, the successful ditching of the plane into the frigid waters of the Hudson is a triumph not of divine intervention, but of something both duller and more interesting: basic human competence. Things worked out the way they did that day because Captain Chesley Sullenberger and his first officer, Jeffrey Skiles, were able to summon years worth of rote aviation experience to transform a narrow body of water into an ad hoc runway.
That bit of spiritual revisionism would seem to make Sully, which will premiere on Friday as the 38th movie Clint Eastwood has directed, fitting for a moment whose movies are as concerned with reveling in lifes banalities as with escaping them. Sully is Eastwoods entry into an expansiveand burgeoninggenre: competence porn.
This term seems to have been coined in 2009, by John Rogers, one of the writers of the TV show Leveragebased on his recognition that, for the audience, watching competent people banter and plan was a big part of the appeal. The genre is older than its coinage, certainly; Star Wars would be considerably less awesome had Luke been unable to get the hang of a light saber. But it is having a particular moment now. Its exuding of competence is what helped to give The Martian its science the shit out of it verve. And what makes Olivia Pope, in Scandal, compelling as a professional as well as a character. And also the doctors of Seattle Grace. And the wonks of The West Wing. And the space-travelers of Star Trek. (And also the cooks of Top Chef, and the designers of Project Runway, and the singers of The Voice, and the bakers of The Great British Baking Show.)
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/09/clint-eastwood-bard-of-competence/498626/
still_one
(92,122 posts)edhopper
(33,561 posts)support the most incompetent man who has ever run for President?
rpannier
(24,329 posts)That's my theory
rug
(82,333 posts)But there is this: why does it take him to point out the singlemost refutation of miracles?
edhopper
(33,561 posts)What do you mean the singlemost? I am just unclear about your meaning?
rug
(82,333 posts)This review picks up on what I think is the singlemost effective response to claims of miracles. Simple human competence.
I referenced Eastwood because, despite his libertarianism, he made a movie which, apparently, quietly states that, deflating the very title of the movie.
agreed, though there have been those saying this for some time.
Though he might be the most visible.
The movie is called "Sully" though they do use the "miracle" in the tag.
[IMG][/IMG]
edhopper
(33,561 posts)for the Hospital with the cyber-knife surgery. First person narration of a Pastor who thanks God first and then the surgery team for his successful surgery. Seems he gets it backward.
rug
(82,333 posts)"Put my trust in God first and then the surgery team."
rug
(82,333 posts)Reminds me of this one.
if the surgery hadn't gone as planned, something went wrong, he, or others would blame the surgeons and say "it was gods will."
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Sully was the acknowledged expert in this move long before it happened. All he had to do, was let it happen. And he'd be a hero. For saving the people from the accident he'd let happen.
rug
(82,333 posts)Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Not so hard when there's a visible flock of them. And you don't take evasive maneuvers.
And its easy when you've mentally rehearsed, even obsessed on, this kind of scenario. And warned everybody it could happen.
Now it happens, and he's vindicated; proven right. And now he's a hero too.
Scully presents classic Munchausen by Another. First make the kid sick. Then nurse him and save him. To look like a savior.
Looks like this has a lesson about Christianity in it, after all.
rug
(82,333 posts)Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Animal cruelty into the bargain.
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)For years Sully warned about this kind of accident, and developed the maneuvers to recover from them. His personal and professional reputation was so invested in this, that in some ways, Sully may have actually wanted this disaster to happen. To vindicate his warnings. And to give him a chance to show that his partial solution worked. One that destroyed the plane, but saved the passengers. And made him a hero.
So Sully was very highly motivated to see that this predicted or prophesied disaster came about. And as a pilot trained to avoid birds in the air, he knew exactly what could cause this disaster.
So did Sully himself actually cause the "accidental" disaster that he was involved in, and that he had long predicted?