Religion
Related: About this forumCourt to spaghetti: You are not a god
Kimberly Winston | April 13, 2016
(RNS) A federal court has ruled that the Flying Spaghetti Monster, referred to as His Flying Noodliness by fans and followers, is not, alas, the object of a real religion.
In a 16-page decision, the U.S. District Court of Nebraska ruled that Pastafarianism is satire, not sacred, and that anyone who thinks it is a religion has made an error of basic reading comprehension.
This is not a question of theology, the ruling reads in part. The FSM Gospel is plainly a work of satire, meant to entertain while making a pointed political statement. To read it as religious doctrine would be little different from grounding a religious exercise on any other work of fiction.
The Tuesday (April 12) ruling came in response to a prisoners request to have Pastafarianism recognized as his religion, which would entitle him to Pastafarian literature and trappings. For example, Pastafarians sometimes wear colanders on their heads.
http://www.religionnews.com/2016/04/13/court-to-pastafarian-you-are-not-a-god/
Decision: https://www.scribd.com/doc/308299698/Cavanaugh-v-Bartelt
rug
(82,333 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Talking snakes, GOOD.
Pasta based, BAD.
"The Court finds that FSMism is not a "religion" within the meaning of the relevant federal statutes and constitutional jurisprudence. It is, rather, a parody, intended to advance an argument about science, the evolution of life, and the place of religion in public education. Those are important issues, and FSMism contains a serious argument but that does not mean that the trappings of the satire used to make that argument are entitled to protection as a "religion." Nor, the Court finds, has Cavanaugh sufficiently alleged how the exercise of his "religion" has been substantially burdened. The Court will grant the defendants' motion to dismiss."
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)What makes "real" religion? Dancing with snakes? Eating the body of Christ? Heaven? This is ridiculous. ALL religion should be treated equal. This judge has no right to say what's "real" and what's not. I'm sure it will be appealed as it should. I have no religion. I wish more people had no religion. It's ALL unreal to me.
rug
(82,333 posts)All your questions are answered in its 16 pages.
Journeyman
(15,026 posts)then bow before his Holy Noodliness.
rug
(82,333 posts)Page 4.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It sufficed as legal standing for me to officiate a wedding.
rug
(82,333 posts)stellanoir
(14,881 posts)am so disappointed.
then again,
a court denounced Christ & he gained an enormous following.
Ramen will endure !!!
/sarcasm
rug
(82,333 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,824 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)msongs
(67,367 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Or, in legal parlance, "For the purposes of a motion to dismiss a court must take all of the factual allegations in the complaint as true, but is not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation." Page 6.
edhopper
(33,488 posts)is not a "real" religion. But one started as a con game for money is?
Hmmm?
rug
(82,333 posts)As to your second question ask Jim Bakker.
edhopper
(33,488 posts)L Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith.
rug
(82,333 posts)Cynical hoaxsters who invent a religion do not go far.
Still, the LDS Smith left behind has prevailed. But I think Scientology has peaked.
look at Paul
Just joking.