Religion
Related: About this forumOnly for those who have read the 4 essays in Ideas and Opinions about science and religion
would you share your thoughts?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)But thanks for asking so politely.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)crickets from many uninvited views
the usual suspects - with knives drawn - only their own baggage to stab
Some great thoughts out there waiting...
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)...instead of posting flamebait?
More flies with honey kinda thing.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)just do not want to hear from people that have not seen the essays
the opposite of flamebait
two of them are easy to find - and free -
easy to buy
A new edition of the most definitive collection of Albert Einstein's popular writings, gathered under the supervision of Einstein himself. The selections range from his earliest days as a theoretical physicist to his death in 1955; from such subjects as relativity, nuclear war or peace, and religion and science, to human rights, economics, and government.
enjoy
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)This is a discussion group. Specifically, a Religion discussion group.
If you only want a particular audience made up of those that have read a specific book, perhaps Good Reads is the place for your post. This certainly isn't it.
And this isn't an "Only for..." group. There are a zillion of those groups on DU if you're looking for that.
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)For those of us that want to get educated?
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)bed time for me now
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer.
Albert Einstein
in Goldman, p. vii
In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human understanding, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.
Prince Hubertus zu Löwenstein, Towards the Further Shore (Victor Gollancz, London, 1968), p. 156; quoted in Jammer, p. 97
I was barked at by numerous dogs who are earning their food guarding ignorance and superstition for the benefit of those who profit from it. Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source. They are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures whoin their grudge against the traditional "opium of the people"cannot bear the music of the spheres. The Wonder of nature does not become smaller because one cannot measure it by the standards of human moral and human aims.
Einstein to an unidentified adressee, Aug.7, 1941. Einstein Archive, reel 54-927, quoted in Jammer, p. 97
http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/
bvf
(6,604 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)And even he resisted quantum physics... and thought we would never observe things his very own theories produced... that we have now observed (like gravitational lensing).
What he thinks of religion might be interesting for a minute or two, but who really cares?
Same for what he thinks of atheists.
I don't see how an argument flawed with an appeal to authority is very relevant.
We've come a long way since Einstein was working.
Is there anything on what he thinks of gay marriage? How about Muslim suicide bombers, what's his take on that?
Got anything on what Feynman thinks of things not related to physics?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)?d1f210b4
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)But thanks for asking.
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Predictable, but funny.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)And I do find that funny!
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...but if the OP author can't be bothered to expend the energy to post a single original thought of their own on the essays why should anyone else bother to come into your thread and do it for you? If you think something about the essays was specifically worth discussing here DO SO.
IOW, it's flamebait.