Sports
Related: About this forumTeam USA vs. Russia hockey: Slava Voynov basically called Jonathan Quick a cheater
The Americans topped Russia in a shootout in their preliminary round matchup at the Winter Olympics on Saturday morning, but the game never would have reached a shootout if Fedor Tyutin's third-period goal wasn't disallowed.
USA goalie Jonathan Quick had kicked the net off its moorings ever so slightly before Tyutin put the puck across the goal line.
The Russians were pretty salty about it after the game, and defenseman Slava Voynov, who plays with Quick as a member of the NHL's Los Angeles Kings, basically called him a cheater.
Voynov on Quick dislodging the net before the Tyutin disallowed goal: "I play with him. I know that's his style." #USAvRUS
http://www.sbnation.com/2014/2/15/5414140/usa-russia-disallowed-goal-slava-voynov-winter-olympic-hockey-2014
Berlum
(7,044 posts)charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)You can probably write them off winning the Cup this year...that kind of anomosity tends to spread among the other players.
caraher
(6,278 posts)To be sure, some goalies to push the net off intentionally and the penalty is rarely called. (Indeed, at my game last Sunday the opposing goalie knocked it free 7 times; when our goalie called him out on it after the game he said only two of those were intentional!)
It's a horrible way to have a goal disallowed, but Quick could not possibly have anticipated that it would result in a disallowed goal.
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)To see if there are any images of Quick deliberately kicking the net?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Quick said he wasnt sure what happened with the post. I didnt know if it happened after the puck went in, he said. I saw it was off. I didnt know if it was before the puck went in right after they scored, a guy skated through the crease. I didnt know if he bumped it.
...
Had this been the NHL, its a goal.
From the NHL Rulebook:
The goal frame shall be considered in its proper position when at least a portion of the flexible peg(s) are still inside both the goal post and the hole in the ice. The flexible pegs could be bent, but as long at least a portion of the flexible peg(s) are still in the hole in the ice and the goal post, the goal frame shall be deemed to be in its proper position. The goal frame could be raised somewhat on one post (or both), but as long as the flexible pegs are still in contact with the holes in the ice and the goal posts, the goal frame shall not be deemed to be displaced.
But its not the NHL. So it wasnt a goal.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/russian-outrage-over-dislodged-net--no-goal--against-jonathan-quick--team-usa-201054242.html
Iggo
(47,546 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)penultimate
(1,110 posts)caraher
(6,278 posts)He was scrambling to his left and had lost his stick temporarily, and pushed off the post with he hand to stay on his feet - that's when it came off. The shot came much later.
The refs should have blown it dead for a faceoff well before the shot, but they didn't notice, either.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Shit happens around the crease.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)why is the same player allowed to shoot over and over again? I mean, it worked out well for us, but ewwww! Anyway, they should just play twenty-minute overtime periods until someone scores.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Those all have to be different. Then it is one round a time and the same player can repeat rounds. T.J. thought he was going to get pulled after his miss.
And you do realize they have to play again the next day. Playing until someone scores could be exhausting.
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)It's a ridiculous way to settle a game, and the Olympic version is even worse with the ability to use the same player over and over again. Having one player who excels in one skills competition event says very little about which team is the better of the two. It also turns one guy into some big hero, while ignoring the teammates who got him to that point. Pisses me off to no end.
I agree that they should just play overtime until someone wins. Or, just settle on ties and split the difference like the NHL used to do--medal rounds/playoffs excepted.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)if you have a David vs. Goliath matchup where one team is stacked with NHL players and the other only has a few, the don't want to see the game simply decided by the depth of someone's lineup. I still think they should scrap the shootout, and they definitely shouldn't have shootouts for medal rounds.
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)I think it was only a prelims thing, and hopefully, we have seen the end of them. I'm pretty sure we'll just be seeing overtime from here on out. As it should be.
Upton
(9,709 posts)wish it was, I don't want medals decided by shootouts, but they will be..
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/sports/olympics/olympic-hockey-is-the-same-except-for-this-and-that.html?_r=0
As I've said before, what an asinine way to settle a hockey game. Very disappointing.