Fri Nov 16, 2012, 08:54 AM
unhappycamper (49,628 posts)
Bradley Replacement to Outweigh Abrams Tank
http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/11/15/bradley-replacement-to-outweigh-abrams-tank/
Bradley Replacement to Outweigh Abrams Tank By Matthew Cox Thursday, November 15th, 2012 1:18 pm Posted in Land The new weight estimate, released by the Congressional Budget Office, mean that the service’s replacement for the outdated Bradley fighting vehicle would be heavier than an M1 Abrams tank and weigh more than two current Bradleys. unhappycamper comment: Be sure to read the comments following the article.
|
4 replies, 558 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
 4 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Bradley Replacement to Outweigh Abrams Tank (Original post) |
unhappycamper | Nov 2012 | OP |
| Jackpine Radical | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| Victor_c3 | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| Jackpine Radical | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| Victor_c3 | Nov 2012 | #2 |
Response to unhappycamper (Original post)
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:13 AM
Jackpine Radical (36,573 posts)
1. OMG what a boondoggle! 84 tons of target.
Response to Jackpine Radical (Reply #1)
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 06:23 PM
Victor_c3 (793 posts)
3. I don't know if you've had any experience with the Bradley in real life
|
Speaking of mobile targer, the Bradley is one of the tallest vehicles on the battlefield. The height is striking when you compare the Bradley and a BMP (the Soviet/Russian equivalent) side by side.
I have nothing bad to say about the Bradley though. I loved mine and felt absolutely secure in it. I had a car bomb blow up on me and it only put little pieces of shrapnel into the reactive armor. However, some weirdo did think it was a cool idea to fire an RPG through the ramp on the back  My driver got a bunch of shrapnel in his back, but nothing else. Maybe they could stand to improve the 360 degree armor protection... |
Response to Victor_c3 (Reply #3)
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:31 PM
Jackpine Radical (36,573 posts)
4. Just the old M113 APC's, and then only in the States.
Response to unhappycamper (Original post)
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:03 PM
Victor_c3 (793 posts)
2. I hope it'll have a softer look to it
|
We had to install some of those KC lights with the smiley faces on our brads to soften the look a little bit.
I was getting nervous that the Army was going to phase out the BFV (Bradley Fighting Vehicle) when they started to field the Stryker around 2003-2004. I had two tanks and two BFVs in my platoon and I was involved in some pretty intense urban fighting. Heavy armored vehicles are invaluable in urban settings. They are great for breaching buildings, eliminating snipers, and for drawing fire. I loved the hell out of my BFV. As much as I would love to see a bigger and better replacement for the Bradley, I didn't experience any major shortcomings in combat. |
