HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » "Hand Obama His Walk...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:03 PM

"Hand Obama His Walking Papers" Cover October American Rifleman Mag

Do you DU'ers like and agree with this? Maybe you need to WRITE to them?

65 replies, 6583 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 65 replies Author Time Post
Reply "Hand Obama His Walking Papers" Cover October American Rifleman Mag (Original post)
HockeyMom Sep 2012 OP
krispos42 Sep 2012 #1
bongbong Sep 2012 #9
4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #19
GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #20
krispos42 Sep 2012 #21
discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #32
krispos42 Sep 2012 #44
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #60
Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #2
ErikO Sep 2012 #4
Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #7
ErikO Sep 2012 #18
cleanhippie Sep 2012 #48
HockeyMom Sep 2012 #5
MrDiaz Sep 2012 #52
ErikO Sep 2012 #3
gejohnston Sep 2012 #6
HockeyMom Sep 2012 #8
Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #10
spin Sep 2012 #36
safeinOhio Sep 2012 #50
gejohnston Sep 2012 #38
Union Scribe Sep 2012 #63
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #11
petronius Sep 2012 #22
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #35
petronius Sep 2012 #41
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #46
msongs Sep 2012 #12
Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #13
former-republican Sep 2012 #15
Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #33
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #37
Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #24
Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #34
hack89 Sep 2012 #43
Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #47
former-republican Sep 2012 #14
ileus Sep 2012 #28
former-republican Sep 2012 #31
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #39
BeyondGeography Sep 2012 #51
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #61
BeyondGeography Sep 2012 #62
ellisonz Sep 2012 #64
ileus Sep 2012 #16
Reasonable_Argument Sep 2012 #17
Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #23
HockeyMom Sep 2012 #25
gejohnston Sep 2012 #29
Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #40
HockeyMom Sep 2012 #42
AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #57
AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #56
slackmaster Sep 2012 #59
Lint Head Sep 2012 #26
MercutioATC Sep 2012 #55
atreides1 Sep 2012 #27
Historic NY Sep 2012 #30
aikoaiko Sep 2012 #45
MercutioATC Sep 2012 #49
slackmaster Sep 2012 #53
MercutioATC Sep 2012 #54
slackmaster Sep 2012 #58
MercutioATC Sep 2012 #65

Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:06 PM

1. Not an NRA member, so I doubt writing from me would help.

The Democrats have chosen to be for stringent laws and regulations on guns. Obama is a Democrat from a major urban center, so having an organization that is against stringent laws and regulations on guns wanting him out of office is perfectly normal and expected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:20 PM

9. But

 

But yet the NRA used (30+ years ago) to be for more gun control, and right now a majority of its members favor gun control. What an Inconvenient Truth!

Their current flip-flop is the result of bribes, oops, donations from gun makers & reich-wing repigs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bongbong (Reply #9)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:26 PM

19. It's worth noting that the NRA has always favored gun control laws

 

just not *all* gun control laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bongbong (Reply #9)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:31 PM

20. And the votes of its 4.5 million members. N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bongbong (Reply #9)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:33 PM

21. Um, yeah.

I've decided that you're not to be taken seriously here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #21)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:53 PM

32. I'm assuming this to be due to...

...an older determination you've already made or have you not been reading stuff he posts?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #32)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:24 AM

44. Yup.

Exactly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #44)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 08:18 PM

60. do any of the antis consider bongbong's posts to be of substance?

do they think he helps their cause? honestly, in my mind he is disruptive for both sides but, maybe I am biased.

Perhaps they take him seriously here and maybe he is posting something of substance in other groups on this site.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:09 PM

2. My question is...

 

How did you get your magazine before I did? Also I tend to skip the political part of the American Rifleman, it's basically run by the NRA-ILA. Oh how I love their junk mail, I really should post some, it's funny as hell. I like the magazine for the gun reviews and the ballistics tests. Like last month's test of Horandy's Critical Defense ammo. After you been reading gun sites/magazine for a few decades you learn to tune out the politics of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Reasonable_Argument (Reply #2)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:14 PM

4. No basically about it, it's the NRA-ILA's magazine.

If you payed separately for your subscription from your membership, they would be able to use that money for the ILA's lobbying.

In 2010, the ILA threw a lot of pro-gun Democrats at the state level under the bus in favor of untested Republicans. At the ILA 'housewarming' I attended, I felt like I was at a Tea Party rally. Their claims of 'bi-partisanship' ring hollow for me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ErikO (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:18 PM

7. I take it you don't read it?

 

I loved the articles last month, I just avoid the letters from the chairmen and the article about Romneybot. I loved the article about the weapons of the american revolution.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Reasonable_Argument (Reply #7)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 06:59 PM

18. Not so much.

I've flipped through it a bit on the newsstand every now and then. I do agree that the articles I have read were good, just not enough to buy it. If they put out an annual like Shotgun Times does I'd buy that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Reasonable_Argument (Reply #7)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 04:28 PM

48. Just goes to show that you will never convince someone that you read Playboy for the articles.

Some people have a preconceived notion and nothing anyone does or says will change it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Reasonable_Argument (Reply #2)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:15 PM

5. I took in the mail and my husband got this magazine

It HORRIFIED me when I saw their COVER with the Pix of Obama and a CHECK.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #5)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 08:16 AM

52. lol

 

horrified...Really? Why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:11 PM

3. Thankfully, there are alternatives to the NRA.

Second Amendment Foundation - www.saf.org -litigate to keep the right to bear arms as available as possible
The Liberal Gun Club - www.theliberalgunclub.org - group to provide Liberal gun owners a place to meet and share the kind of knowledge and training that were the NRA's roots before they started the NRA-ILA lobby group
Gun Owners' Caucuses of the Democratic Party - aligned state Caucuses that are working to increase the exposure of Democrat candidates who are not anti-gun in an effort to stop gun restriction laws from being passed.

While President Obama's stance on several issues are 180 degrees from Candidate Obama's back in 2008, I personally think he is less of a threat to our gun rights than Romney, who saw a permanent 'Assault Weapons' Ban go into effect in MA due to his signature. He could have vetoed it, but he chose to sign it.

Actions speak louder than words.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:16 PM

6. Like they would listen to me?

not being a member or anything. I would like Chris Cox explain this one
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/07/chris-dumm/romney-panders-to-nra-anti-gunners-simultaneously/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:19 PM

8. This is offensive to me as an OBAMA SUPPORTER

That is my point. Gun owners cannot be Obama supporters?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #8)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:23 PM

10. It's simply

 

A lesser of two evils. I disagree with a lot of what this administration has done, but given the alternative I want him to get a 2nd term. If he touches that 3rd rail of gun control, don't be surprised when I don't defend the democrats in the subsequent elections. As I said before, I'm a principled man and a liberal... I don't carry water for anyone including the democratic party.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #8)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:34 PM

36. Of course you can be a gun owning Obama supporter. ...

I am an NRA member and have enjoyed target shooting for over 40 years and also have a concealed carry permit.

I voted for Obama in the last election and will again in this one. Obama has basically been very friendly to gun owners in his first term and even received an "F" rating from the Brady Campaign. I do realize that some very prominent Democrats wish for draconian gun control but lack support from other Democrats. The majority of the Democrats that I can vote for in local, state and congressional election are strong supporters of gun rights and have high ratings from the NRA.

I have absolutely no idea of who Romney is or what he actually stands for.

Obviously he is a member of the 1% but many other very rich presidents have done a lot to help our nation. JFK was very wealthy as was Lydon Johnson and FDR. George Washington was our richest President followed by Thomas Jefferson. (source: http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0220/Presidents-Day-trivia-Who-were-the-10-richest-US-presidents/John-Tyler-51-million)

Mitt Romney, if elected, would be in our top three wealthiest presidents but to me that doesn't disqualify him. My problem with Mitt is that he has been on every side of every issue at some time during his political career. He is not merely a waffler but is in fact a shape shifter. Currently he is pretending to be very conservative. Once in office who knows what he will support? I don't always agree with every issue that a candidate supports but I do insist that I know exactly what their position is.

As far as the gun rights issue I have confidence that Obama is not going to suddenly change in his second term and try to ban and confiscate all firearms. I actually agree with many of his ideas on improving the gun laws in our nation although he hasn't been real vocal on this topic.

I feel the Romney will sell out gun owners in a heartbeat if he perceives a political advantage. Therefore he poses a far greater threat to gun rights than Obama and the Democrats do. In fact, I will go so far as to state that if your most important political issue is much stronger or draconian gun control, you might consider voting for Romney.

I simply can't vote for Romney as he talks out of both sides of his mouth. I can also add that while I have no problem with his being rich, I feel he is totally out of touch with the reality of the struggle that most people face today in this nation. I feel he looks down on poorer people and blames them for the fact that they are not wealthy.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spin (Reply #36)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 07:05 AM

50. Anyone that gets an F from both the NRA and Brady,

gets my vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to HockeyMom (Reply #8)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:24 PM

63. It's clear to me they aren't basing that on gun policy.

I know this because they are always speculating about what he'll do next term, because they have nothing to talk about in re his first term. And they sometimes drop the gun mask and make broader comments about Obama being against our "way of life." And backing Mitt? As if he wasn't as, if not more, for gun control than Obama ever was? AFAIC they're a bunch of RWers who pretend they're against him on guns but the pretense is rice-paper thin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:30 PM

11. Not sure I'll write to an organization of which I am not a member...

but I am heartened to see Outdoor Life (the more conservative of the big "hook & bullet" mags, along with Field & Stream) take note of the ambivalence of pro-hunting/fishing organizations with regard supporting Romney, and with voting straight-ticket for one party or the other. Noted as "bad guys" in the latest issue are two GOPers who "went over" to the anti-hunting side of pending anti-hunting legislation. Seems they got sizeable cash contributions from HSUS, which has set up shop in California in hopes of making it the bellweather non-hunting state.

(Unable to google up Oct. OL issue, info from hard copy)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #11)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:40 PM

22. Would you put F&S on the conservative end of the magazine spectrum as well?

It's the only one I read in that genre, so I don't have much comparison, but I've always been a bit (positively) surprised at their stances on environmental issues, especially climate change...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to petronius (Reply #22)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:32 PM

35. I have a similar take on F&S as well...

OL has more content on the gun-control issue (the October, 2012 issue has a self-defense w/ handgun article). But they aren't as overboard as the strictly gun aficianado press. F&S has regular pieces on industry threats to wildlife/hunting/fishing. The thing that keeps both (and other) outdoor publications in line are groups like Trout Unlimited and some hunting organizations which object to mining and drilling on hunting lands. Petersen's Hunting is much more conservative, saving its vitriole for anti-hunting groups. I like the much more expensive Gray's Sporting Journal (bi-monthly). Great articles on hunting, fishing, good fiction, photo essays, book reviews, art criticism -- even a poem. On slick card stock. Seems they are into hard copy for the long haul, even selling old-type magazine volume binders.

IMO, the biggest problem with the politics of outdoor sports/conservation is the split promulgated by "animal rights" advocates and gun-control advocates. This has been seriously damaging, wrenching apart groups who at least cooperated with each other in the past. I've read issues of the Big Two from the 60s, and there was little mention of liberal-conservative dichotemies, and environmental articles were not met with regular derision.

Good hearing from you. Back in action after my 'puter bombed in March. I even got a smart phone! (I was "SteveM" or "SteveW" since 2006.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #35)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:12 PM

41. Ah, excellent - good to see you back! Does that mean you're just now making

the DU3 transition?

I tend to agree with you about the sporting/conservation splits - I don't hunt (except with a speargun) but I do fish, backpack, and otherwise spend a lot of my recreation time outdoors. It just seems so obvious that environmentalists, wilderness users of all stripes, plus farmers/ranchers are natural allies on a lot of topics, enough to outweigh the differences. With more people living in urban and suburban setting, and fewer people using the wilderness, it seems like those alliances are increasingly important if we want to protect what we have. Unfortunately, that's not the general trend in political interactions.

I'll have to keep an eye out for Gray's, thanks for the tip!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to petronius (Reply #41)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 01:42 PM

46. Thanks, glad to be back. I got a whiff of DU3 just before the Blue Screen of Death.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:44 PM

13. You cannot be for the Democratic Party and the NRA.

 

As a gun owner, the NRA can go fuck itself seven ways to Sunday.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #13)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:53 PM

15. Then something needs to change

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former-republican (Reply #15)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:05 PM

33. Yeah, the NRA.

 

Face it, the NRA stopped being voice for gun owners years ago and became a self serving money fleecing operation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #33)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:38 PM

37. I have old hunting/fishing mags from the 60s. The NRA was different...

mentioning gun law bulletins as just one of its services when you joined. Their ads were a few column inches in the back. Now, you see full page(s) color boomers in hook-n-bullet mags and other outlets.

That didn't happen without provocation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #13)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:52 PM

24. Why not?

 

In the last election, all of my Democratic candidates except one had high marks from the NRA, and 3 of them were the endorsed candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #24)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:12 PM

34. They must have been the only three.

 

Where do you live?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #34)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:09 AM

43. In 2010 the NRA endorsed 14 incumbent House Democrats over Republican challengers

But in what will no doubt come as a surprise to many, the organization is endorsing 14 House Democrats in close races because their Second Amendment views line up with the with those of the gun-rights group.

It's an unwelcome move as far as Republicans are concerned. They've come to take NRA endorsements of their candidates as a given.

The Washington Post reports the NRA's policy in recent years is to support incumbents when their positions on gun rights are similar to the NRA's and their challengers.


http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2010/10/06/130393162/nra-endorses-14-house-democrats

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #34)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 03:48 PM

47. LOL maybe so! :)

 

I live in Huntsville, Alabama.

I bet there are lots of pro-gun democratic politicians in the south.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 05:45 PM

14. Too bad the Democrats don't get this.

 

If they only would stop with the gun control debate

We would gain an additional 10% of votes every election. ( that would be huge)

Yet they shoot them selves in the foot every time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former-republican (Reply #14)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:29 PM

28. Every Southern state could be in play with a progressive stance on the 2A.

From our party....but no we like pissing away the Southern votes because rednecks shouldn't be allowed SD firearms.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #28)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:38 PM

31. I know

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #28)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 09:48 PM

39. Yep. No reason why there shouldn't be at least one or two Democrats...

from North Central Florida elected to Congress. The GOPers have branded themselves as pro-gun, pro-hunting and the Democrats arer still playing footsy with animal rights and gun-control groups. Gun-control is an elitist outlook, and the party apparatus is top-heavy with that ideology, preserving the doctrine in the face, IMO, of general party opposition. It's almost as if there is a spitefulness in the Platform: We don't care what you rank-n-file think, we're gonna ram this down your throat even if the GOP can make hay out of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #28)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 07:53 AM

51. Says you

I think southern whites would be playing Lucy-with-the-football with our party long after any agreement on gun laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Reply #51)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 08:22 PM

61. why do you think that? can you elaborate, please. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #61)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:24 PM

62. When the population trends work in our favor i.e. NC

and perhaps GA down the road, we have a chance at the presidential level. Otherwise, we could distribute guns down there and still lose.

One man's take:

http://my.firedoglake.com/davidalove/tag/south/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Reply #51)

Fri Sep 21, 2012, 02:02 AM

64. +1000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 06:04 PM

16. Not a member, won't be anytime soon.

I hate people calling me and bumming money...spamming my mail and email whining for my money.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #16)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 06:54 PM

17. I take it

 

You don't donate to political campaigns, good god the spam is endless.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 07:50 PM

23. I have.

 

I have written to the NRA concerning their anti-Obama rhetoric.

Of course, it falls on deaf ears

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:12 PM

25. I wanted confirmation that DU'ers would support OBAMA

over something like what was on this magazine. I hoped that would be the case, and that gun owners would also be offended by this magazine as blatantly anti-Obama.

While I am not a gun owner, my issues go far beyond one issue (even as a female) in my being a Democrat and supporting Obama.

It sounds like some people would vote for a REPUBLICAN on the gun issue alone? Let me just say this, you vote for a Republican and you get the WHOLE PACKAGE, not just one issue that you support.

I hope the mods can understand my point of view. I am not attacking gun owners, just promoting the WHOLE Democratic principles, and something which I found very ANTI-OBAMA. We MUST stick together to elect a DEMOCRAT, people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #25)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:29 PM

29. is that a poor set up or serious question?

I haven't seen the issue, or read the rant. I don't plan on looking for it either. It is probably something I would expect them to scribble.

Even without a law, Mitt could result in an economic ban because of declining wages and broken unions. Of course Blair Mt re enactments would get the right behind gun bans, just like the right supported licensing schemes and bans in the south back in the day.

My FIL voted Democratic based on health care alone. For the most part, he was a fairly conservative guy.

OK we agree on two things, Florida sucks compared to NYC/Wyoming (depending on individual) and must stick together as Democrats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #25)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:00 PM

40. I not sure why you are looking for "confirmation" in this Group...

Over and over again, the regular pro-2A folks here have expressed support for the Democratic candidates (including Obama). There is a lot of agitprop from controller/banners to the effect that we are "NRA/GOP supporters." It's almost daily, that crap is here. I guess it just goes to show that even liberals are subject to: If you repeat the lie long enough, it becomes the truth (did you check on that jury ruling in this thread? Why is it 5-1?).

BTW, my Dad, who was a life-long Republican, supported universal health care after his gall bladder operation blew up in the 50s. Such are single issues. He was a gun-owner, too, in an era which was not nearly so polarized around around guns. Frankly, anti-gunners MADE the modern NRA over a puffed-up "issue" that wasn't even mentioned in the Platform until well after the Zombies had charted all their major hits (1968).

Good to see your posts; I've been on a hiatus since March, and have a new screen name.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #25)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 10:17 PM

42. Would you find that magazine cover offensive??

Perhaps that is what I should have asked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #42)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 01:15 PM

57. Free speech doesn't offend me.

I may fairly dismiss it as garbage though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #25)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 01:14 PM

56. I don't think anyone here indicated they would vote for Romney?

Is lack of offense = voting for Romney?

I'm not offended by that mag. I have a membership for access to a local gun range. Requirement to join. That magazine showed up, and I threw it in the trash with all the other garbage. I'm not offended by free speech. I'm just not interested in their particular flavor of it, so it goes in the garbage.

I'm voting for Obama, and so are most or all of the people in this sub-forum. Might be some conscientious objectors looking at progressive alternatives that are anti-war, and I can understand their position. That's fine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #25)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 07:05 PM

59. I have never decided a vote on the basis of anything the NRA said

 

Ever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:26 PM

26. I'm just hoping some day that racists just STFU.

If this is not code for racism there is no racism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lint Head (Reply #26)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:57 AM

55. Methinks that you're a little touchy

 

This is a gun control issue. How the hell do you turn it into a racial issue?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:27 PM

27. I am an NRA member(until October)

I've written them before...for all the good it did! They don't give two shits what members have to say, mainly because they get most of their funding from gun manufacturers.

I decided not to remain a member of this organzation of weasels, racists, bigots, and corrupt clowns!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:30 PM

30. As I've said before the NRA left me years ago ....

I've had and carried since I was 18 ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:45 AM

45. I've actually spoken to a board member.


He responded with an all's fair in love and politics type of response.

I haven't spoken to him since Romney became the obvious nominee. I should if takes my call.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 05:07 PM

49. We brought this on ourselves.

 

As long as our official platform calls for a new AWB and closing the gun show "loophole", we're at odds with groups like the NRA. Their response was the only thing that could have been expected, and it's completely consistent with the narrow scope of their mission.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:42 AM

53. I think it's pathetic that what is supposedly a single-issue organization would support Mitt Romney

 

Romney is no friend of the right to keep and bear arms. The President has been silent on the issue. He's basically a blank slate.

Romney is a known quantity - He has a track record of duplicity and pandering.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to slackmaster (Reply #53)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:56 AM

54. The official Democratic platform encourages a new AWB and closing the gun show "loophole".

 

Do you really expect a gun magazine to do anything other than beat up on the Democratic candidate?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MercutioATC (Reply #54)

Thu Sep 20, 2012, 07:04 PM

58. It would be interesting to see what the NRA did if those two planks were removed from our platform

 

Unless the candidate expressed an anti-RKBA position, they really wouldn't have any excuse to beat up on him or her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to slackmaster (Reply #58)

Fri Sep 21, 2012, 06:29 PM

65. The NRA does support pro-RKBA Democrats.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread