Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:59 PM Feb 2012

"L.I. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy’s district on the chopping block." No more shoulder thing that goes up?

Note that it's the Democrats that are throwing her under the bus:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/i-rep-carolyn-mccarthy-district-chopping-block-article-1.1019514?localLinksEnabled=false


L.I. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy’s district on the chopping block

State losing two congressional seats based on Census results


By Kenneth Lovett / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Wednesday, February 8, 2012, 8:59 PM

ALBANY — Democratic Rep. Carolyn McCarthy’s Long Island district is on the chopping block as state leaders begin redrawing congressional boundaries, the Daily News has learned.

State Senate and Assembly negotiators are looking at merging McCarthy’s Nassau County district into a Nassau-Queens district now held by fellow Dem Gary Ackerman, sources close to the planning said.

McCarthy’s current district “collides” with Ackerman’s, making it a perfect candidate for merger, insiders said.

The lines are expected to be drawn in a way that favors Ackerman in a potential primary....
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"L.I. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy’s district on the chopping block." No more shoulder thing that goes up? (Original Post) friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 OP
Makes a certain amount of sense. TheWraith Feb 2012 #1
????????? bongbong Feb 2012 #4
actually no gejohnston Feb 2012 #5
still ???????????? bongbong Feb 2012 #6
Actually, no. Straw Man Feb 2012 #7
Oh bongbong Feb 2012 #8
So ... Straw Man Feb 2012 #9
Actually... bongbong Feb 2012 #22
You are, of course, quite correct. discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2012 #15
strawman alert bongbong Feb 2012 #21
Yeah... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2012 #26
Patently, demonstrably false. Callisto32 Feb 2012 #10
asdf bongbong Feb 2012 #18
Not that you are correct, but for the sake of argument Lurks Often Feb 2012 #13
asdf bongbong Feb 2012 #19
If what you said was factual Glassunion Feb 2012 #14
asdf bongbong Feb 2012 #20
so, gejohnston Feb 2012 #23
Thanks bongbong Feb 2012 #24
not really gejohnston Feb 2012 #28
That is not evidence at all. Glassunion Feb 2012 #25
I should've qualified my statement bongbong Feb 2012 #27
I need some clarification. Glassunion Feb 2012 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #30
No comments on the fact that it's the NY Democratic Party giving McCarthy the shiv? friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #31
Or maybe Gary Ackerman will go under the bus JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2012 #2
Too early to tell ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #3
A bit? Callisto32 Feb 2012 #11
You would have thought that the word "barrel" would have been a Simo 1939_1940 Feb 2012 #17
Is anybody else bothered by the use of "collides" here? Callisto32 Feb 2012 #12
Too bad it didn't happen to the 18th district in Texas. oneshooter Feb 2012 #16

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
1. Makes a certain amount of sense.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:20 PM
Feb 2012

Like most of the politicians who push gun control, she's a crypto-Republican. She only switched parties in order to run for Congress, and was a big supporter of the Iraq War until about 2007 or so when it became impossible to defend.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
4. ?????????
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:06 PM
Feb 2012

> Like most of the politicians who push gun control, she's a crypto-Republican

It's like a statement from an alternate universe!

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
5. actually no
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:25 PM
Feb 2012

there is a long list of them. Many of the founders of the gun control groups for starters. One is now working at the Manhattan Institute. In her case, she ran as a Dem (while still a registered Republican) only after losing a GOP primary. She has been a life long Republican and did not change her party registration until her second term. She also championed the Enron loophole, which lead to more destruction than any "gun show loophole".

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
6. still ????????????
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:52 PM
Feb 2012

So I guess the way the NRA rips any Democrat to shreds and openly endorses every single repig is just a weird coincidence.

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
7. Actually, no.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 01:16 AM
Feb 2012
So I guess the way the NRA rips any Democrat to shreds and openly endorses every single repig is just a weird coincidence.

Not a coincidence, but a fantasy. The NRA skews right, but it has endorsed Democrats over Republicans many times. You might want to do a little fact-checking before you post.
 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
8. Oh
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 01:52 AM
Feb 2012

You mean how some Democrats get conservative about gun rights after being threatened by the NRA, and then the NRA endorses them?

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
9. So ...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:01 AM
Feb 2012

... are you retracting your assertion that "the NRA rips any Democrat to shreds and openly endorses every single repig"? Because apparently even you now recognize that it flat-out isn't true, right?

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
22. Actually...
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:54 AM
Feb 2012

It appears there are a few NRA endorsements of Dems. Most of these occur after a Dem is targeted by the NRA and they are worried about keeping their seat, and they "moderate" their position to match what the NRA wants them to say.

However, I have not been able to find a repig who was running for office & was attacked by the NRA. I don't think such an animal exists. Do you know of any?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
15. You are, of course, quite correct.
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 08:46 PM
Feb 2012

The NRA should absolutely endorse Pelosi, Schumer... The political views of the citizens which are represented by the NRA don't deserve to be heard.


 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
18. asdf
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:48 AM
Feb 2012

So let's see your evidence. Should be awfully easy to find it.

I know it is ultra-easy to find the evidence that the NRA blasts Democrats on a regular basis.

https://www.google.com/search?q=nra+blasts+democrats

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
13. Not that you are correct, but for the sake of argument
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 06:54 PM
Feb 2012

, wouldn't that mean that such a Democrat was more interested in his/her politicial career, then doing what was right? Is that what you are trying to say?

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
14. If what you said was factual
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 08:31 PM
Feb 2012

you would have a point. However...

I'm afraid you are quite mistaken.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
24. Thanks
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:29 PM
Feb 2012

Thanks for the evidence that supports my position. From an article your link returned:

"It's an unwelcome move as far as Republicans are concerned. They've come to take NRA endorsements of their candidates as a given."

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
28. not really
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 04:40 PM
Feb 2012

the GOP was taking them for granted, the NRA cares about the guns not the party. Do you know the difference between the party vs one line in the party platform? The individual congress person vs the party? Are you saying a real progressive on health care, corporate greed, etc is not a real Democrat because he is not in lock step on what is really a backwater issue?

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
25. That is not evidence at all.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:59 PM
Feb 2012

That is a Google search. Not to mention, the first page of results gives me the following:
1st - Dianne Feinstein was the one blasting Democrats, not the NRA.
2nd - Is a link to a DU post about e-mail, not the NRA blasting anyone.
3rd - Is a Wiki link about a themed restaurant.
4th - Is a link about John Stewart blasting the NRA, not the NRA blasting anyone.
5th - Dianne Feinstein was the one blasting Democrats, not the NRA.
6th - Is another forum post. Its says the NRA blasted a Dem Gov, however the link is dead.
7th - Is an article about Romney “Flip-Flopping”. BTW there is zero mention of the NRA in the article.
8th - Is freeper post about a police chief blasting the NRA, not the NRA blasting anyone.
9th - Is a Huffpo article by Frank Lautenberg talking about the NRA. The NRA is not blasting anyone.
10th - Is from a website devoted to stopping the ACLU. The blasting mentioned is a Democrat blasting a climate change bill.

Your "SMALL" sample has actually yielded nothing.

Here is your statement: "So I guess the way the NRA rips any Democrat to shreds and openly endorses every single repig is just a weird coincidence. "

Your statement is not factual. If they "rip any Democrat to shreds" then please show me where they ripped the following Democrats:
Strickland, Ted
Shuler, Heath
Boyd, Allen
Altmire, Jason
Skelton, Ike
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie
Matheson, Jim
Holden, Tim
Boren, Dan
Mollohan, Alan B
Ross, Mike
Davis, Lincoln
Space, Zachary T
Childers, Travis W
Cardoza, Dennis
Halvorson, Deborah
Dingell, John D
Taylor, Gene
Rahall, Nick
Hill, Baron

If they "openly endorse every single repig" then where was their endorsement of the above's opponents?

Why did 30% of their direct contributions to candidates go to Democrats in 2010? Also, since the '06 elections the average direct donation to Democrats is higher than to Republicans.

So to reiterate your statement... "So I guess the way the NRA rips any Democrat to shreds(No they do not) and openly endorses every single repig(No they do not) is just a weird coincidence(There is no coincidence)."

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
27. I should've qualified my statement
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 03:56 PM
Feb 2012

It should've been: "So I guess the way the NRA rips any Democrat who acts like a Democrat to shreds, and openly endorses every single repig who isn't running against a repig-acting Democrat or running against a Democrat-acting Democrat is just a weird coincidence. "

I stand corrected.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
29. I need some clarification.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 05:01 PM
Feb 2012

What actions do deem to be a Democrat acting like a Democrat vs a Democrat acting like a Repub?

The reason I ask, is that there are quite a few Dems, who act like Dems, vote like Dems who have also been endorsed by the NRA.

I've also seen the NRA fail to openly support or endorse a Republican who is running against a Democrat who acts like these other Democrats.

Your new statement does not hold much water either.

Response to Glassunion (Reply #29)

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
31. No comments on the fact that it's the NY Democratic Party giving McCarthy the shiv?
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:54 PM
Feb 2012

Yeah, I'd want to divert attention away from that too. It fucks up the "The NRA is behind it" meme...

Callisto32

(2,997 posts)
11. A bit?
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:31 AM
Feb 2012

Like that time Feinstein muzzled the crowd with her finger on the trigger?

"Shoulder thing that goes up." Lol.

Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)
17. You would have thought that the word "barrel" would have been a
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 10:00 PM
Feb 2012

clue as to the general location of a barrel shroud.

Callisto32

(2,997 posts)
12. Is anybody else bothered by the use of "collides" here?
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:34 AM
Feb 2012

"Abuts, is adjacent to, borders, touches..." all kinds of great, accurate words and phrases they could have used, and the politicians (surprise surprise) picked one that makes absolutely zero sense.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA» "L.I. Rep. Carolyn ...