Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 09:31 AM Apr 2014

Want Guns With That? Chefs Find Politics Hotter Than Kitchen

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/01/us/chefs-find-political-waters-anything-but-tepid.html

CLEMSON, S.C. — Pete Matsko expected a little pushback when he posted a sarcastic sign banning concealed weapons from Backstreets Pub & Grill, his beer and burger bar in this college town, but he did not expect to become a national target.

Within weeks, he was slammed with so many online attacks and harassing phone calls that he changed his number and started asking the police to open his mail.

A new concealed-weapons law in South Carolina turned his pub into a battlefield in America’s culture wars. Like an increasing number of bar and restaurant owners around the country, Mr. Matsko discovered that his politics can matter more than what he serves.

As the position restaurants hold in American culture grows, so too does the list of issues on which chefs are asked to make a stand. Refusing to bake a cake for a gay wedding, requesting that a woman not breast-feed at the table or trying to prevent a diner from wearing a gun can have serious business implications.

(excerpt, remainder of article at link)

It should be noted that not once in the entire article is the word “douchebag” (the term the restaurant owner used to describe people who carry concealed) mentioned. Instead, they say the sign used a “derogatory term used for an obnoxious person”, leaving the reader with the impression in could have been something as innocuous as “jerk”.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Want Guns With That? Chefs Find Politics Hotter Than Kitchen (Original Post) Jgarrick Apr 2014 OP
Just curious nykym Apr 2014 #1
A retail business is not normally liable for the actions of their customers Lurks Often Apr 2014 #2
He has only himself to blame bossy22 Apr 2014 #3
Dupe SecularMotion Apr 2014 #4
I know of many restaurants in which they have signs banning guns. Jenoch Apr 2014 #5
No matter the topic, a sign like that would turn me off to the establishment petronius Apr 2014 #6
His freedom of speech versus customers voting with their feet DonP Apr 2014 #7

nykym

(3,063 posts)
1. Just curious
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 09:42 AM
Apr 2014

All restaurants I would imagine carry an insurance policy.
In general what is the insurers policy towards guns in a restaurant?
I know when some school districts planned to allow school personnel to carry guns their insurance carries said if you do we will drop your coverage.

You may have the right to carry a gun but you do not have the right to jeopardize someones business exercising that right.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
2. A retail business is not normally liable for the actions of their customers
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 09:57 AM
Apr 2014

So be it a restaurant, book store, food store, etc, if a customer carries a gun and uses it inside the business, the business would not normally be liable.

On the other hand if a employer chooses to allow or require an employee to be armed, then they become liable for the employee's actions. That's why so many companies have some form of no guns or no weapons allowed on premises written some where in the employee rules/hand book

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
3. He has only himself to blame
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 10:06 AM
Apr 2014

there were many other ways to tell potential customers that he does not want guns in his restaurant but he chose to do it in an insulting manner. It's like a doctors office having a sign saying "we do not accept lazy, drunk, loser patients who have medicaid"

He decided to be an ass and now he is getting it in return

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
5. I know of many restaurants in which they have signs banning guns.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 10:12 AM
Apr 2014

The difference is that the signs I have seen simply state &quot This restaurant) bans guns on these premises." None of these restaurants has made national news because of their sign banning guns as far as I am aware.

Pete Matsko chose to post a sign that refers to CCW permit holders as losers and douchebags.


http://www.cbc.ca/asithappens/mobile/touch/features/2014/04/01/when-pete-matsko-decided-to/

petronius

(26,602 posts)
6. No matter the topic, a sign like that would turn me off to the establishment
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:51 PM
Apr 2014

Fairly or not, the public 'face' of a restaurant leads to conclusions about the sort of dining experience one might have there, and a belligerent or offensive or cutesy or otherwise unattractive tone at the point of entry is often a deterrent. It may have been personally satisfying and/or entertaining, but I doubt it was a good business decision...

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
7. His freedom of speech versus customers voting with their feet
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:57 PM
Apr 2014

I'm sure all the gun control supporters will be sending him checks and going there for meals to show their financial support to reward him for taking a principled, if rude, stand.

Ha, like gun control people ever spend their own money.

Maybe they'll wait for Bloomberg to host a brunch there and wait for him to pick up the check.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Want Guns With That? Chef...