Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 06:50 AM Feb 2013

Fact check: Gov't officials and assault weapons bill

TheTeaParty.net falsely claims in an email that Sen. Dianne Feinstein's proposed assault weapons ban would exempt "all government officials" from the ban. While the bill would exempt military and law enforcement officials, it would not exempt legislators or administrative staff.

The email further misrepresents the proposed bill, claiming that "she [Feinstein] wants to take your handguns, rifles and other weapons away from you." In fact, the proposal would grandfather in all of the existing weapons owned by Americans, so no weapons will be "taken away" from anyone.

Feinstein, a Democratic from California, and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat from New York, unveiled their proposed legislation at a press conference on Jan. 24. The bill, called the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013, seeks to reinstate and expand on the 1994 assault weapons ban, which was allowed to expire in 2004.

According to an email blast from TheTeaParty.net, under the Feinstein-McCarthy proposal, "We are not all equal under the law."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/04/fact-check-assault-weapons-bill-tea-party/1891097/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fact check: Gov't officials and assault weapons bill (Original Post) SecularMotion Feb 2013 OP
If these guns, are ONLY good for mass killing, and killing as quickly as possible.. virginia mountainman Feb 2013 #1
I guess cops occasionally have to slaughter people kudzu22 Feb 2013 #3
Magazines are a consumable item. appal_jack Feb 2013 #2
Once you can no longer sell, give away, or bequeath an item in your possession, you no longer... slackmaster Feb 2013 #4
Why do the assume my families lives are less important ileus Feb 2013 #5

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
1. If these guns, are ONLY good for mass killing, and killing as quickly as possible..
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 07:37 AM
Feb 2013

Why do government officials need them?

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
2. Magazines are a consumable item.
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 09:38 AM
Feb 2013

Magazines are a consumable item. By banning new magazines, the law WOULD take my handguns, rifles, and other weapons, if only gradually.

I know that DiFi and McCarthy each witnessed horrible gun tragedies in their lives (Feinstein saw Harvey Milk shot, while McCarthy lost her husband to gun violence), but theze proposed gun bans are doing much more harm than good. All they have accomplished thus far is to reinvigorate the Republican Party around this issue and helped to sell tens of thousands of AR-15's to first-time buyers. It's time for DiFi and McCarthy to make a new plan: one that does not infringe on the RKBA.

-app

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
4. Once you can no longer sell, give away, or bequeath an item in your possession, you no longer...
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 03:37 PM
Feb 2013

...truly own it.

According to an email blast from TheTeaParty.net, under the Feinstein-McCarthy proposal, "We are not all equal under the law."

I don't disagree with that statement at all. It's factual.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
5. Why do the assume my families lives are less important
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 03:56 PM
Feb 2013

Than theirs....I want the best tools possible to protect our lives.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Fact check: Gov't officia...