Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumWorld wide violence statistics per capita vs firearm control laws.
http://www.rampageshooting.com/People get so overly focused on the US news they don't follow what's going on internationally.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 989 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
World wide violence statistics per capita vs firearm control laws. (Original Post)
Remmah2
Jan 2013
OP
DanTex
(20,709 posts)1. So the US is way, way above the international average.
If you look at the countries above us, you see they are small in population, which means that one or two major shooting events could cause their average to go way up (e.g. Norway). But that is mostly "noise". If you look a large enough region to smooth out the bumps (e.g. Western Europe), then US is far higher.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)2. Look at it this way.
There's never been a sucessful invasion here.
Genocide in America was limited to the American Indians.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)3. Ah, the ol' "gun control caused the holocaust".
The NRA talking points are alive and well in the gungeon!
Really.
MightyMopar
(735 posts)5. Actually Shermans march was a strong invasion against milltia
The British burning Washington and then their army was destroyed by a freak hurricane
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,476 posts)6. Actually...
...had Sherman been on the losing side, he'd have probably been charged with brigandage.