Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:04 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
This message was self-deleted by its authorThis message was self-deleted by its author (barbiegeek) on Thu Nov 8, 2012, 02:07 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
|
18 replies, 1135 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
| Author | Time | Post | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| Marrah_G | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| Dawgs | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| Dawgs | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| countingbluecars | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| HooptieWagon | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| Warren Stupidity | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| GodlessBiker | Nov 2012 | #11 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #14 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #17 | |
| DURHAM D | Nov 2012 | #12 | |
| Bluenorthwest | Nov 2012 | #13 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #16 | |
| Bluenorthwest | Nov 2012 | #15 | |
| barbiegeek | Nov 2012 | #18 |
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:05 AM
Marrah_G (22,370 posts)
1. Not sure how that could be correct
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:07 AM
Warren Stupidity (31,888 posts)
2. Based on what data? Link? I call bullshit.
|
My guess is the actual number would be in the 70-90 range.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #2)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:09 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
3. In La times
|
I hope this link works better.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Reply #3)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:10 AM
Warren Stupidity (31,888 posts)
5. Try again. Your link posting foo is weak.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #5)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:13 AM
Dawgs (10,755 posts)
7. The link worked for me. n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #2)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:11 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
6. I hope so, because it is freaking me out
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:09 AM
Dawgs (10,755 posts)
4. Doubt it. n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:14 AM
countingbluecars (4,343 posts)
8. More like 75%
|
according to the exit polls.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:15 AM
HooptieWagon (6,296 posts)
9. That might be margin of victory.
|
I heard numbers like 75%-O, 25%-R
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:19 AM
Warren Stupidity (31,888 posts)
10. I think you are misinterpreting the data.
|
Last edited Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:21 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The result turned out to be an unbeatable combination: virtually universal support from black voters, who turned out as strongly as in 2008, plus decisive backing from members of the younger and fast-growing Latino and Asian American communities, who chose Obama over Romney by ratios of roughly 3 to 1. All of those groups contributed to Obama's majority among women. (Gay voters, a far smaller group, went for Obama by a 54-point margin .)
Here I'll help. If 54% (your interpretation) voted for Obama, then 46 voted for somebody else. 54-46 =8. But instead the difference "the margin" is 54. X - Y = 54. X + Y = 100. X = 54 + Y. 54 + 2Y = 100. 2Y = 46. Y = 23. X = 77. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #10)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:40 AM
GodlessBiker (6,292 posts)
11. Yes. The gay D votes beat the gay R votes by 54 percentage points.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #10)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:49 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
14. So 77% voted D?
|
That makes more sense. I was really gonna be upset if it was 54%.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #10)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:51 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
17. Thank You for explaining it to me and not being mean about it
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:45 AM
DURHAM D (18,574 posts)
12. This OP says 90% -
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:47 AM
Bluenorthwest (24,103 posts)
13. Read up on what 'margin' means.
|
This post makes you look dense.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #13)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:50 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
16. Apparently, I am dense then. But I still support your rights-even if you name call me
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to barbiegeek (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:50 AM
Bluenorthwest (24,103 posts)
15. Try 90%....read this link, if your eyes can bear the truth...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #15)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:58 AM
barbiegeek (1,007 posts)
18. I only wrote my post because I was worried. We work very hard here to keep gay marriage. Yes, I
|
am one of the people who stomp "Steve King's" area for support, because people know me. Even though they (my neighbors) pray in Church for my soul. It's is a small rural area with a lot guns. I still walk for support for every ballot measure and election with my head up.
So ya, my eyes can bear the truth... In fact, I welcome it. You didn't have to be mean about it. |
Cannot reply in locked threads

