Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 08:02 AM Feb 2012

Women protest anti-abortion bills in Va. by locking arms, standing mute outside state Capitol

By Associated Press, Published: February 20




RICHMOND, Va. — Hundreds of women stood mute, arm-in-arm, forming a human cordon through which legislators walked before Monday’s House and Senate sessions to protest a wave of anti-abortion legislation coursing through Virginia’s General Assembly.

Capitol and state police officers, there to ensure order, estimated the crowd to be at least 1,000, perhaps 1,500 at the noon peak of the protest.

The silent demonstration was over bills that would define embryos as humans and criminalize their destruction, require “transvaginal” ultrasounds of women seeking abortions, and cut state aid to poor women seeking abortions.

Molly Vick of Richmond said it was her first time to take part in a protest, but the issue was too infuriating and compelling. On her lavender shirt, she wore a sticker that said “Say No to State-Mandated Rape.” Just beneath the beltline of her blue jeans was a strip of yellow tape that read “Private Property: Keep Out.”

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/arm-in-arm-women-line-capitol-square-sidewalks-and-stand-mute-protesting-invasive-measures/2012/02/20/gIQARqjdPR_story.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Women protest anti-abortion bills in Va. by locking arms, standing mute outside state Capitol (Original Post) maddezmom Feb 2012 OP
This is nothing more then state sanctioned rape. Rex Feb 2012 #1
well said! La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #2
Thanks! Rex Feb 2012 #4
Here is an interesting editorial titled: Va.'s Ultrasound Bill Is Unconstitutional OKNancy Feb 2012 #3
from LBN: Virginia Governor Backs off Ultrasound Bill maddezmom Feb 2012 #5
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. This is nothing more then state sanctioned rape.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 08:16 PM
Feb 2012

I still cannot believe anyone would support this!!! It is outragous and a very dangerous precedent to set imo. I had to look up what 'transvaginal' ultrasounds meant and when I saw the diagram...my eyes fell out of my head and rolled around behind the sofa!

So what happens to the first woman that says NO? Will she be arrested?

This is controlled insanity.

This is what the word WRONG means.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Thanks!
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:26 AM
Feb 2012

I swear to you I never thought this country could get any more fucked up then when GWB was in office.

What is the federal government going to do? Oh right...the 5 guys up front in suits.





OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
3. Here is an interesting editorial titled: Va.'s Ultrasound Bill Is Unconstitutional
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 10:37 PM
Feb 2012

Virginia state legislators passed a bill requiring women to receive an ultrasound — which is conducted via transvaginal probe in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy — before having an abortion. Dahlia Lithwick, senior editor for Slate magazine, calls the proposed law "an abomination."

http://www.npr.org/2012/02/21/147203580/op-ed-va-s-ultrasound-bill-is-unconstitutional

On the page you can listen to the NPR interview

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
5. from LBN: Virginia Governor Backs off Ultrasound Bill
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 01:50 PM
Feb 2012

Virginia Governor Backs off Ultrasound Bill


RICHMOND, Va., Feb. 22 (UPI) -- Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell backed off his unqualified support for a bill requiring women to have an ultrasound before an abortion, his office said.

At the same time, state lawmakers worked behind the scenes to soften the measure, The (Norfolk) Virginian-Pilot and The Washington Post reported.

McDonnell, who campaigned as an opponent of elective abortion, initially said he would sign the measure if it made it to his desk. He now will no longer make that commitment, his office said.

"Our position is: If the General Assembly passes this bill the governor will review it, in its final form, at that time," spokesman Tucker Martin said in a statement cited by the Post.

Martin declined to explain the reason for McDonnell's change. The governor can sign, veto or amend the legislation.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/101457897

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Women protest anti-aborti...