Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,229 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:10 PM Jul 2015

Naomi Wolf misses the point about 'vocal fry'. It's just an excuse not to listen to women

Naomi Wolf misses the point about 'vocal fry'. It's just an excuse not to listen to women

Let’s face it – it’s not women’s voices that are annoying, it’s the fact they’re speaking. Stop telling women how to speak and just listen to them.

‘When Naomi Wolf urges women to change their vocal patterns to regain their strength, she merely addressed a symptom.’ Photograph: viewpress Vp / Demotix/viewpress Vp/Demotix/Corbis



The first time I ever even noticed vocal fry was when someone was complaining about vocal fry. It was in an episode of the radio show This American Life. Apparently, listeners had been calling in to complain about about some of the younger female presenters’ speaking voices. Apparently, they were making a croaky sound when speaking. I had never even noticed it.

But since I heard about it, I’ve been paying attention, and I have observed as many young men doing it as young women. There is ample evidence that shows men do it too. But you’d never know that from all the moralising and hypothesising about young women and vocal fry.


Vocal fry is not a problem. It is merely another excuse to dismiss, ignore and marginalise women’s voices, both literally and figuratively. And it’s just the latest in a long history of finding excuses not to listen to what women, especially young women, say. The rejection of women’s literal voices is not a new phenomenon. Before vocal fry, there were complaints about overuse of the word “like”. Before that, there was upspeak. Even the mere sound of women’s voices is used as an excuse to dismiss women.

. . . .

All of this brings to mind Claudine Herrmann’s The Tongue Snatchers, which suggests that language itself is constructed in a way that marginalises women. It describes the two options usually available to women: to either be silent or to adopt the dominant language of men. But even when we adopt and adapt, there are always excuses not to listen, representing the no win situation women are faced with. When they speak with assertiveness, they’re bossy or aggressive, even “bitchy”. Vocal fry is merely the most recent excuse not to listen to women.

. . . .

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/28/naomi-wolf-misses-the-point-about-vocal-fry-its-just-an-excuse-not-to-listen-to-women

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

niyad

(113,229 posts)
2. I had never heard the term before running across it here on du. and, if I understand what
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:30 PM
Jul 2015

it sounds like, I have never heard anyone speaking that way.

Novara

(5,838 posts)
4. To me it makes the person sound as stupid as uptalking
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 06:58 AM
Jul 2015

There's an expert on something or another that msnbc often will bring on (the economy?) and every word he says sounds like that. I can't listen to him.

But Naomi Wolf is wrong. It does matter. If you sound like an idiot, you won't be taken seriously, no matter what sex you are. She should be focusing on the fact that women need to work harder at sounding professional so they're not ignored. Yeah, they're already at a disadvantage, but telling them that using "popular" speaking styles doesn't matter is just plain wrong. It does matter. Throwing out convention because you assume you've already lost the game is the absolute wrong way to go about it.

niyad

(113,229 posts)
5. I think that the author made the correct point. no matter HOW women talk, we will be
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:04 AM
Jul 2015

ignored. do we sound whiny? do we sound too forceful? too aggressive? too meek? the game is rigged, no matter what we do.

Novara

(5,838 posts)
6. I agree, however, we don't do ourselves any favors if we speak poorly
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jul 2015

In this matter I think we have to play their game and try twice as hard to be thought of as half as good. Clinging to poor pronunciation and grammar in an effort to hold fast certainly won't help.

niyad

(113,229 posts)
7. I constantly hear/see poor pronounciation and grammar in people who are supposed to be
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jul 2015

educated and aware. it is extremely painful to my poor, abused ears.

Novara

(5,838 posts)
8. Oh me too.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:20 PM
Jul 2015

There's a time to code-switch and there's a time to speak like you're a national news anchor.

I do think America is getting more stupid as inappropriate grammar/language/spelling has become more commonplace and more acceptable.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Naomi Wolf misses the poi...