HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Gender & Orientation » LGBT (Group) » A One-Two Punch for Worke...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Apr 15, 2012, 12:58 PM

A One-Two Punch for Worker Protection: Both Federal Law and Executive Order Are Necessary

from the Center For American Progress

At a time when many families are struggling economically, recent research and data show that gay and transgender Americans are far too often forced out of a job and into the ranks of the unemployed due to workplace discrimination. To help solve this problem and put gay and transgender workers on equal footing with others in the workforce, federal policymakers should take two different steps.

First, Congress could pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA, into law. ENDA would prohibit most public and private employers from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. It is mirrored to some extent on the protections and recourses that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides to workers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

Second, President Barack Obama could use his executive authority to require federal contractors to not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Currently, Executive Order 11246, or EO 11246, prohibits federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

...

ENDA’s hopes for passage in the near term look bleak given the political climate in Congress. But even if Congress were to defy the political odds and pass ENDA today, an executive order for federal contractors would still be needed to level the workplace playing field for gay and transgender workers.

First, ENDA (as currently introduced in Congress) applies to employers with 15 or more employees, which is the same threshold that applies to Title VII. The existing contractor executive order, EO 11246, however, applies to businesses of any size that receive a government contract in excess of $10,000. So a federal contractor executive order that includes sexual orientation and gender identity would extend workplace protections for gay and transgender workers in smaller companies that are doing business with the federal government who would otherwise not be covered under ENDA. A CAP-commissioned poll from late last year showed that a majority of small business owners said that they support these types of policies and that they would not be a financial burden to implement or maintain.

Second, a contractor executive order would ensure that gay and transgender people have the same type of protections currently afforded to women, people of color, and others under EO 11246. Under the proposed ENDA, individuals and groups of individuals must come forward to file discrimination complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (which people can do now thanks to Title VII for discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin). But people discriminated against by federal contractors based on those five characteristics can also file complaints through the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, or OFCCP, which enforces EO 11246.


Click Here To Read More


4 replies, 871 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply A One-Two Punch for Worker Protection: Both Federal Law and Executive Order Are Necessary (Original post)
The Philosopher Apr 2012 OP
Zorra Apr 2012 #1
The Philosopher Apr 2012 #2
customerserviceguy Apr 2012 #4
William769 Apr 2012 #3

Response to The Philosopher (Original post)

Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:11 PM

1. Thanks. That's a great page for information. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorra (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:16 PM

2. I thought so, too.

It really shows there's no reason an executive order shouldn't be issued. When you take away that argument, there's nothing left to argue against the order unless you don't want to support the LGBT community.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Philosopher (Reply #2)

Sun Apr 15, 2012, 03:41 PM

4. I just cannot expect an executive order any time soon

Maybe after the election, the President will feel he has more "flexibility".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Philosopher (Original post)

Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:04 PM

3. Recommended.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread