Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumThe Case Against Prop 8 Failed at the Supreme Court. Why Are We Still in Denial About That?
By Mark Joseph SternOn Aug. 4, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker became the first federal judge in the history of the United States to rule that a state-level gay marriage ban violated the U.S. Constitution. His order overturning Californias Proposition 8 and restoring marriage equality was, it later turned out, the last valid ruling on the merits of the case. The trial was a momentous event, a profound investigation into anti-gay animus and its place in the law. Its outcome marked the first domino in what would soon be a cascade of pro-gay-marriage rulings. And the legal theories that stood behind Walkers ruling would soon be echoed in courtrooms in every state in the union.
The first 75 minutes of HBOs new documentary The Case Again 8, which premieres tonight, tells the thrilling, emotional, inspiring story of Walkers trial with passion and clarity. Had the film ended there, it would have been nearly perfect. But of course the film cant stop there, because the lawsuit didnt stop there: It hurtled through the appeals process, dogged by questions of standing, for nearly three more years, a process the Supreme Court eventually erased by holding that the case effectively ended the day Walker handed down his ruling.
What is history to make of the Prop 8 case, then, with its messy epilogue and muddled legal impact? Thats the question prompted by The Case Against 8, a question it never quite answers. Ted Olson and David Boies, the odd couple/dream team who argued the case on and off for more than three years, clearly wanted it to become a vehicle that would take down every gay marriage ban on the books. The gay rights groups that supported their quest saw the lawsuit as a way to make amends after failing to defeat Prop 8 in the first place. And the plaintiffs at the heart of the case, the documentary proves, just wanted to get married.
Throughout its runtime, the documentary bounces among these three competing goals without ever landing on one coherent narrative. When the Supreme Court punted on the case, ignoring its merits and expunging everything except Walkers original ruling, gay rights groups claimed that the justices restored marriage equality to California. Olson and Boies insist in the film that this was their goal all along, implying that anything elsesay, a ruling that brought gay marriage to all 50 stateswould simply be some kind of added bonus. No one admits on camera that the Supreme Courts narrow decision was disappointing, or anything less than they had hoped for. No one sees it as anything but a triumph.
more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/06/23/the_case_against_8_tells_half_the_story_of_proposition_8.html?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1009 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Case Against Prop 8 Failed at the Supreme Court. Why Are We Still in Denial About That? (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jun 2014
OP
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)1. Damn. I miss a lot of good stuff by not having HBO
But I've got all the cable we can afford.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)2. I'm watching it tonight!
I know it's not the full story, but I think it will be a good program anyway.
dsc
(52,152 posts)3. any lawyer will tell you his job is to serve his client
the lawyers in this case did that. While the decision doesn't help the rest of us it did, combined with Winsor restore marriage to his clients, which is a win.